search for: histedit

once taken that stat/stat64 appart, histedit appears to be a minefield: usr/dash/histedit.c:59: error: expected ?=?, ?,?, ?;?, ?asm? or ?__attribute__? before ?*? token usr/dash/histedit.c:60: error: expected ?=?, ?,?, ?;?, ?asm? or ?__attribute__? before ?*? token usr/dash/histedit.c: In function ?histedit?: usr/dash/histedit.c:82: error: ?...

...//git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=e3e5ce11c99ce4e5638df44ed87661945a241632 Author: Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il> AuthorDate: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 08:32:16 +0200 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 02:57:21 +0000 [klibc] histedit: fix build with musl libc musl libc defines the optreset BSD extension only in getopt.h. This fixes the following build failure: histedit.c: In function 'histcmd': histedit.c:220:2: error: 'optreset' undeclared (first use in this function) optreset = 1; optind = 1; /* initialize...

...kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=a2020fbd897e3c3d41c75294f4e43a0e07487822 Author: Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il> AuthorDate: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 08:32:16 +0200 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:54 +0000 [klibc] dash: histedit: fix build with musl libc [ dash commit 523d24878f5fb20c03210d10a919058a43fb5c31 ] musl libc defines the optreset BSD extension only in getopt.h. This fixes the following build failure: histedit.c: In function 'histcmd': histedit.c:220:2: error: 'optreset' undeclared (first use i...

...ng then we will end up using freed memory. This patch fixes it by making evalstring always duplicate the string before using it. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> --- usr/dash/eval.c | 3 +++ usr/dash/histedit.c | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/usr/dash/eval.c b/usr/dash/eval.c index da39136d..755136e2 100644 --- a/usr/dash/eval.c +++ b/usr/dash/eval.c @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ evalstring(char *s, int flags) struct stackmark smark; int status; + s = sstrdup(s); se...

...ng then we will end up using freed memory. This patch fixes it by making evalstring always duplicate the string before using it. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> --- usr/dash/eval.c | 3 +++ usr/dash/histedit.c | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/usr/dash/eval.c b/usr/dash/eval.c index e6f6cd5c..adf05fde 100644 --- a/usr/dash/eval.c +++ b/usr/dash/eval.c @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ evalstring(char *s, int flags) struct stackmark smark; int status; + s = sstrdup(s); se...

...lib.h -- Looking for zlib.h - found -- Looking for fenv.h -- Looking for fenv.h - found -- Looking for FE_ALL_EXCEPT -- Looking for FE_ALL_EXCEPT -found -- Looking for FE_INEXACT -- Looking for FE_INEXACT - found -- Looking for mach/mach.h -- Looking for mach/mach.h - found -- Looking for histedit.h -- Looking for histedit.h - found -- Looking forCrashReporterClient.h -- Looking forCrashReporterClient.h - not found -- Performing TestHAVE_CRASHREPORTER_INFO -- Performing TestHAVE_CRASHREPORTER_INFO - Success -- Looking for pthread_create inpthread -- Looking for pthread_create inpthrea...

Hi, I've noticed that building 4.1p1 fails on FreeBSD 4.x if the libedit support is enabled by the "--with-libedit" configure option. I tried to build OpenSSH-4.1p1 under the following environment: CPU: i386 family OS: FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE Compiler: gcc-2.95.4 (/usr/bin/gcc) ---- libedit: (located at /usr/lib/) Building fails with the following messages: ---------- gcc

...ing for fenv.h - found -- Looking for FE_ALL_EXCEPT -- Looking for FE_ALL_EXCEPT - found -- Looking for FE_INEXACT -- Looking for FE_INEXACT - found -- Looking for mach/mach.h -- Looking for mach/mach.h - not found -- Looking for mach-o/dyld.h -- Looking for mach-o/dyld.h - not found -- Looking for histedit.h -- Looking for histedit.h - found -- Performing Test HAVE_CXXABI_H -- Performing Test HAVE_CXXABI_H - Success -- Looking for pthread_create in pthread -- Looking for pthread_create in pthread - found -- Looking for pthread_getspecific in pthread -- Looking for pthread_getspecific in pthread - fou...

...| 73 +++--- usr/dash/eval.h | 1 - usr/dash/exec.c | 21 +-- usr/dash/expand.c | 228 ++++++++---------- usr/dash/expand.h | 12 +- usr/dash/histedit.c | 4 +- usr/dash/input.c | 42 +--- usr/dash/input.h | 3 +- usr/dash/jobs.c | 93 ++++---- usr/dash/main.c | 18 +- usr/dash/memalloc.c...

Hallo all, I was trying to Build LLVM with the cmake option LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES just out of curiosity. I used the RELEASE_400/final tag. It didn't work as I almost expected. So I'm wondering if the modulemaps aren't maintained anymore? If they aren't maintained anymore, why aren't they removed and that cmake option also removed?

Hi, I'm trying to do a build and install on Windows 10 with Visual Studio 2015 Community Edition for the X86 and ARM targets, from the current release_40 branch. While compilation completes without error, the INSTALL target fails with the following error: 54> CMake Error at projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/cmake_install.cmake:34 (file): 54> file INSTALL cannot find 54>

...zlib.h -- Looking for zlib.h - not found -- Looking for fenv.h -- Looking for fenv.h - found -- Looking for FE_ALL_EXCEPT -- Looking for FE_ALL_EXCEPT - found -- Looking for FE_INEXACT -- Looking for FE_INEXACT - found -- Looking for mach/mach.h -- Looking for mach/mach.h - not found -- Looking for histedit.h -- Looking for histedit.h - not found -- Looking for CrashReporterClient.h -- Looking for CrashReporterClient.h - not found -- Looking for linux/magic.h -- Looking for linux/magic.h - found -- Looking for pthread_create in pthread -- Looking for pthread_create in pthread - found -- Looking for pt...

Building dash in parallel still fails: GEN dash/builtins.def HOSTCC dash/mkinit HOSTCC dash/mknodes HOSTCC dash/mksignames HOSTCC dash/mksyntax dash/mksignames.c:59: warning: function declaration isn?t a prototype dash/mksignames.c:365: warning: function declaration isn?t a prototype dash/mksignames.c:386: warning: function declaration isn?t a prototype KLIBCCC

...| 73 +++--- usr/dash/eval.h | 1 - usr/dash/exec.c | 21 +-- usr/dash/expand.c | 228 ++++++++---------- usr/dash/expand.h | 12 +- usr/dash/histedit.c | 4 +- usr/dash/input.c | 42 +--- usr/dash/input.h | 3 +- usr/dash/jobs.c | 93 ++++---- usr/dash/jobs.h | 2 +- usr/dash/main.c...

...zlib.h -- Looking for zlib.h - not found -- Looking for fenv.h -- Looking for fenv.h - found -- Looking for FE_ALL_EXCEPT -- Looking for FE_ALL_EXCEPT - found -- Looking for FE_INEXACT -- Looking for FE_INEXACT - found -- Looking for mach/mach.h -- Looking for mach/mach.h - not found -- Looking for histedit.h -- Looking for histedit.h - not found -- Looking for CrashReporterClient.h -- Looking for CrashReporterClient.h - not found -- Looking for linux/magic.h -- Looking for linux/magic.h - found -- Looking for pthread_create in pthread -- Looking for pthread_create in pthread - found -- Looking for pt...

...| 73 +++--- usr/dash/eval.h | 1 - usr/dash/exec.c | 21 +-- usr/dash/expand.c | 228 ++++++++---------- usr/dash/expand.h | 12 +- usr/dash/histedit.c | 4 +- usr/dash/input.c | 42 +--- usr/dash/input.h | 3 +- usr/dash/jobs.c | 93 ++++---- usr/dash/jobs.h | 2 +- usr/dash/main.c...

...| 73 +++--- usr/dash/eval.h | 1 - usr/dash/exec.c | 21 +-- usr/dash/expand.c | 228 ++++++++---------- usr/dash/expand.h | 12 +- usr/dash/histedit.c | 4 +- usr/dash/input.c | 42 +--- usr/dash/input.h | 3 +- usr/dash/jobs.c | 93 ++++---- usr/dash/main.c | 18 +- usr/dash/memalloc.c...

I had only a quick view on the blog-texts. It might be that a CLANG generated with LTO/PGO speeds up the build. Can you confirm this? Can you confirm binutils-gold speed up the build? Has LLVM an own linker? Can be used? Speedup the build? Yesterday night I loooked through available CMAKE/LLVM variables... ### GOLD # CMAKE_LINKER:FILEPATH=/usr/bin/ld #

Hello, Le 12/12/2016 à 18:29, Hans Wennborg a écrit : > +Sylvestre who knows about these things. > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Kris van Rens via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> L.S., >> >> I'm currently in the process of creating Debian packages for >> clang/llvm release 3.9.0. For this I'm using the steps as explained on

Hello all Im using sftp 1:4.7p1-8ubuntu1.2 in a batchjob Ive noticed that sftp needs a long time for sending a filelist. The timespan increases exponential if many files are on the remoteserver. for example "ls -la *.txt" needs 10 seconds for 2000 files but needs 50 seconds for 4000 files. For 150.000 Files i have to wait 15 minutes for example but the