search for: hipl

...he problem. I got a message something like: Assuming that you are in /etc/sudoers!!!! And then asked for a password. Which password? My userid or root's? I tried both and after 3 tries got: me is not in sudoers file. This incident will be reported. removing '/home/me/rpmbuild/BUILD/hipl--main--2.6/hipl-1.0.4' So I look at /etc/sudoers and do not understand what I am suppose to do there. A bit of help would be greatly appreciated! oh, and what is BEET support in the kernel?

A colleague supplied me with a set of rpms he built on his Fedora box and when I tried to install them with yum localinstall I got a missing dependency: Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package hipl-doc.i386 0:1.0.4-1 set to be updated ---> Package hipl-tools.i386 0:1.0.4-1 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: python(abi) = 2.5 for package: hipl-tools ---> Package hipl-firewall.i386 0:1.0.4-1 set to be updated ---> Package hipl-lib.i386 0:1.0.4-1 set to be updated --> Pr...

I am switching the box that I did the HIPL rpm builds over to running from rpms built directly by the HIPL team (http://infrahip.hiit.fi/hipl/release/1.0.4/). I did the 'make uninstall' and then 'yum install hipl-all', but the hipl-firewall rpm did not install. Seems like I have a mess on my system with the various hip...

I can find xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.901-1 for EL5, but not the current xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.903-1 (which only goes from FC8 on). Since my OQOs have the CX700M2 chip and there are listed enhancements for this chip in the 903 version, I would really like to get it...

I am asking this on behalf of the HIPL developers; http://infrahip.hiit.fi/ https://launchpad.net/hipl They have been working on getting their code consistant to the new libnetfilter architecture. Finally have Fedora 18 and 19 available, but have hit a stumbling block with Centos 6. They tell me they are not finding libnetfilter_...

I am trying to erase an rpm with yum erase. It fails: service hipfw does not support chkconfig Removed: hipl-firewall.i386 0:1.0.4.1 Complete! And it is not removed.... If I try with rpm -e, I get the same error message. So how do I remove this rpm?

I have to build my own rpms for the HIPL project. I update my copy of the code and make rpm. Thing is the rpm name never changes from patch to patch. Is there a way to have yum apply the new code as an update and not have to erase then install?

Just pulled the lastest patches to HIPL (well the last replay was 11/24, so a number of nights behind) and tried a 'make rpm' and got the error: error: Failed build dependencies: uuid-devel is needed by hipl-1.0.4-1.i386 And I can'd find any rpm that has this module. I have tried different things in yum a...

Does the version of OpenSSL on Centos 6.5 support ECDSA keypairs? How do I test if this works? (though I should probably ask this on the OpenSSL list) The reason I suspect a problem is that HIPL for Centos (http://infrahip.hiit.fi/) is not creating the ECDSA Host Identity, whereas my Fedora installation IS creating the ECDSA HI.

I am working with HIP for Linux: http://infrahip.hiit.fi/ We are looking to some major server support on currently Centos 6 cloud images. Problem is for other distros, hipl has moved on to libnetfilter_queue which is not supported in Centos 6. See: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6698 How can we get this as part of the standard install and maintained libs? thank you.

I am trying to build a custom kernel for the HIPL code (infrahip.hip.fi), using the patch for the Linux 2.6.18 kernel. I followed all the instructions for getting the kernel source and making a custom kernel provided on the wiki. The rpmbuild fails with the following messages: Get an error on this step (figured out my other problem): Patch...

My colleague, doing the HIPL development, principally uses ubuntu and although he is now building the Fedora/Centos rpms for me, he leaves much of the testing to me..... Anyway for any kernel prior to 2.6.27, I have to run the hip code in userspace, not kernel space. This is due to the ESP BEET patch. There is a specifi...

Hi all, The CentOS community is pretty limited in what we can do to the core distribution. Since our mantra is "aiming to be 100% compatible with Red Hat Enterprise Linux" we cannot fix bugs or improve the CentOS core without waiting for Red Hat to make those modifications first. We have limited leverage and a 6-month release cycle against us. But that is not the complete truth,