search for: hinnant

On Feb 14, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Howard Hinnant <hhinnant at apple.com> wrote: > Author: hhinnant > Date: Fri Feb 14 15:09:01 2014 > New Revision: 201432 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=201432&view=rev > Log: Remove myself as owner of libc++ > > Modified: > llvm/trunk/CODE_OWNERS.TXT &g...

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Howard Hinnant <hhinnant at apple.com> wrote: > On Feb 14, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Feb 14, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Howard Hinnant <hhinnant at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> Author: hhinnant >>> Date: Fri Feb 14 15:09:01 2...

On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: > >> In many places there is code that looks like: >> >> MBBI = next(MBBI); >> >> In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these >> calls are made. And due to ADL the above call becomes ambiguous: >> llvm::next or std...

On Nov 16, 2009, at 10:49 AMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: > On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > >> >> On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: >> >>> In many places there is code that looks like: >>> >>> MBBI = next(MBBI); >>> >>> In C++0X there i...

On 12/19/11 7:19 PM, Howard Hinnant wrote: > On Dec 19, 2011, at 7:14 PM, Shea Levy wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> Is it possible, if using libc++ and compiler-rt, to have a clang with no >> runtime dependencies on any GCC components on Linux? If not, will this >> ever be possible? > We are workin...

Hi All, LLVM now includes a C++ standard library, written by Howard Hinnant. You can read about it here: http://blog.llvm.org/2010/05/new-libc-c-standard-library.html Or get the code here: svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk libcxx If you have questions or comments, please direct them to one of the clang mailing lists. Thanks! -Chris

In many places there is code that looks like: MBBI = next(MBBI); In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these calls are made. And due to ADL the above call becomes ambiguous: llvm::next or std::next? I recommend: MBBI = llvm::next(MBBI); -Howard

...; http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits or this: > From: John Kåre Alsaker <john.mailinglists at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] builtins: Add __probestack support functions for x86 > To: john.mailinglists at gmail.com > Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu, howard.hinnant at gmail.com > Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:13:07 +0000 (5 hours, 39 minutes, 29 seconds ago) > Reply-To: reviews+D9858+public+2b5918b1dd4651e5 at reviews.llvm.org > > REPOSITORY > rL LLVM > > http://reviews.llvm.org/D9858 > > EMAIL PREFERENCES > http://reviews.llv...

On Aug 10, 2018, at 9:35 PM, Eric Fiselier <eric at efcs.ca> wrote: > > Part of me is still concerned with the future, and the filesystems which are yet to exist. > Me too. But it is best to target modern systems when targeting future systems adds an unnecessary cost. When future systems come into being, it is likely because future hardware is making those future systems

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Howard Hinnant <hhinnant at apple.com> wrote: > On Sep 28, 2012, at 5:54 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > Reduced testcase: > > > > template<typename T> struct A { typedef decltype(T() + 0) type; }; > > template<typename T> struct B {...

On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: > In many places there is code that looks like: > > MBBI = next(MBBI); > > In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these > calls are made. And due to ADL the above call becomes ambiguous: > llvm::next or std::next? > > I recommend: &gt...

Howard Hinnant wrote: > On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > >> "next" is a popular name; if it breaks llvm, I'd expect this standards change to break a lot of existing code. Do you really want to do that? >> > > I'm happy to open an LWG iss...

On 5/11/10 4:43 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Hi All, > > LLVM now includes a C++ standard library, written by Howard Hinnant. You can read about it here: > http://blog.llvm.org/2010/05/new-libc-c-standard-library.html > > Or get the code here: > svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk libcxx > > If you have questions or comments, please direct them to one of the clang mailing lists. Thank...

...then the free wouldn't be called), but I know LLVM doesn't use exceptions in its codebase. Are exceptions actually disabled in the build? (I assume so) How are memory allocation failures handled? How do the standard library types function in the absence of exceptions? (I've seen Howard Hinnant checking in changes to libc++ to support cases where exceptions are disabled & I was wondering what sort of semantics he (& libstdc++ too) provide when exceptions are disabled). - David

...LiveRange&A, SlotIndex B) ? Actually, the other way around. > According to C++(2003) 25.0.0.8 the answer is "yes", however that section talks about BinaryPredicate and not Compare. The standard is rather unclear at this point and I'm going over to comp.std.c++ to ask. Howard Hinnant was kind enough to clarify this a while back. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2010-August/010379.html >

On Tuesday 11 May 2010 15:43:21 Chris Lattner wrote: > Hi All, > > LLVM now includes a C++ standard library, written by Howard Hinnant. You > can read about it here: > http://blog.llvm.org/2010/05/new-libc-c-standard-library.html > > Or get the code here: > svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk libcxx > > If you have questions or comments, please direct them to one of the clang > mailing lis...

On Sep 28, 2012, at 10:18 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Howard Hinnant <hhinnant at apple.com> wrote: > On Sep 28, 2012, at 5:54 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > Reduced testcase: > > > > template<typename T> struct A { typedef decltype(T() + 0) type; }; > > template<typename T> struct B {...

Hi @llvm, Am 08.03.2011 20:14, schrieb Jakob Stoklund Olesen: > Is that extra method getting called? What happens if you stick assert(0) in there? That won't work either (that is, the assert fires). In debug mode the MSVC lib tries to test the ordering of the sequence. And it uses the yielded predicate for this (which in this particular case is a very bad idea). > I hoped the

On May 11, 2010, at 7:26 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Tuesday 11 May 2010 15:43:21 Chris Lattner wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> LLVM now includes a C++ standard library, written by Howard Hinnant. You >> can read about it here: >> http://blog.llvm.org/2010/05/new-libc-c-standard-library.html >> >> Or get the code here: >> svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk libcxx >> >> If you have questions or comments, please direct them to one...

...; the at&t assembly syntax. Again: my offer to provide these routines still stands! I have OPTIMISED __divdi3, __moddi3, __udivdi3 and __umoddi3 in Intel syntax, wrapped as inline files into an NMakefile, for use with ML.EXE. For the optimisations see the patch I sent last week. Since Howard Hinnant is NO MORE with LLVM: who is the CURRENT code owner and reviewer for the builtins library, especially for x86? I'm asking this SIMPLE question now for the 3rd time! I also have __udivmoddi3: adding the pointer to the remainder as argument and 4 more instructions will turn it into __udivmoddi4...