search for: highwir

...emove Rails'' inability to handle more than one thread. In the absence of that solution, however, we''ve implemented (in Ruby) what might be the world''s smallest load-balancer. It only ever sends a single request to each member of the cluster at a time. It''s called HighWire and is available on RubyForge (no Gem yet - it''s on the list of things to do!): svn checkout svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/highwire Using this instead of mod_proxy_balancer, and running the same test script above, we see approximately 54 fast and 6 slow requests per minute. HighWire is...

I''m developing small intranet solution that displays some data from another internal HTTP server. Using ''net/http'' I''m getting data via rails controller action from another server, this works quite well. Processing data on another server takes approx. 1-2 seconds, what is fine and acceptable, but now rails application takes 1-2 sec to respond to the user.

Hi, I double checked the configuration with xm and the "w!" option seems to be configured :-( I also upgraded to build 123, but also no change in behaviour. Thus is this a RAC 11.2 problem or is there a general problem using zvols as as shared disks for xVM domains ? (device (vbd (protocol x86_64-abi) (uuid 048d282d-da4c-2e0b-b9f4-f3f4cc0811c7)

Hi, the diskmon issue in RAC 11.2 was a firewall issue. The clusterware is running OK now and also the new ACFS (ASM Cluster filesystem) seems to work properly using a shared ZFS volume. Cheers, Marc

I'm looking at the possibility of using shared folders to solve a particular problem for my employer and I have a few questions: 1) Can shared folders be in mbox format while allowing the user's mail to be in maildir format? (I think the answer is yes, but wanted to check). 2) What version of dovecot should I be running in order to support shared folders? 3) Is

I'm running Dovecot version 1.2.11 and getting this assertion error on a user's mail: Panic: file /home/durket/dovecot-1.2.11/src/lib-index/mail-transaction-log-view.c: line 290 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq != max_file_seq || max_file_seq != view->head->hdr.file_seq || max_file_offset != (uoff_t)-1 || min_file_offset <=

Do the Outlook workarounds in Dovecot 1.x still apply to current versions of Outlook? Or has Microsoft fixed Outlook such that workarounds are no longer needed in Dovecot (and if so, after what version of Outlook can I remove the workaround settings in my dovecot.conf file)?

Is it possible to have multiple Listen directives in a dovecot configuration file for the same protocol? I am running dovecot-1.2.11 and I want to be able to use the "standard port" as well as a test port: protocol imap { listen = *:143 listen = *:10143 ssl_listen = *:993 ssl_listen = *:10993 for example. Or is this more preferably done by pointing

I'm seeing this periodically in my logs for a specific user (followed by a backtrace which I've deleted from this post): Panic: file dovecot-1.2.11/src/lib-index/mail-transaction-log-view.c: line 290 (mail_transaction_log_view_set): assertion failed: (min_file_seq != max_file_seq || max_file_seq != view->head->hdr.file_seq || max_file_offset != (uoff_t)-1 || min_file_offset <=

In converting everyone at our site from UW-IMAP I've run into another problem with Thunderbird users that I'm hoping someone can help me with. The dovecot version I'm running is old (1.0.13 - we don't do production upgrades that often but I'm perfectly willing to install a newer version). The affected Thunderbird users are running Thunderbird version 2.0023 under Windows. All

Hi ! In snv_127 I suddenly face a problem I never had before. Xvm can''t attach a vif to my primary physical nic any longer: $ pfexec xm start ulrac1 Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. error: Failed to create vnic over yukonx1 with MAC address 00:16:36:3c:bf:70 This worked fine in all previous snv_12x releases I tested, including snv_126. I think there is a privilege

I've been testing Dovecot for a while now and am preparing to replace our outdated IMAP system with it. The current system serves about 300 email users who run a mixture of clients (Eudora, Apple Mail, Thunderbird and Outlook). Can any of the many experts on this list answer a few questions: 1) What's the latest stable release of Dovecot I should be running on this new system

We're converting UW-IMAP users here to dovecot. Some of them have seen the error message issued when Thunderbird clients try to delete folders and I understand what's going on (from previous postings) that Dovecot doesn't support mbox subfolders within folders. What puzzles me is that many of these users already have folders within folders (I've found typically 2 levels of

Our installation currently uses an old version of UW-IMAP. Instead of upgrading to the latest version, we're in the process of testing dovecot 1.0.13 on a Solaris 9 machine (using a different set of network ports of course so both the old and new systems can coexist during testing). We've been asking selected users to switch from UW-IMAP to dovecot in order to test various clients