search for: highlevel

Hi! as highlevel languages (like opencl) support operations with a vector on one side and a scalar on the other side (e.g. vector * scalar) it would be convenient if llvm ir would have a splat instruction that takes a scalar and produces a vector with all elements filled with the scalar. i assume that i'm not...

...@printf(i8* getelementptr inbounds ([11 x i8]* @.str, i32 0, i32 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([5 x i8]* @.str1, i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind ret i32 0 } declare i32 @printf(i8* nocapture readonly, ...) nounwind A good thing about this question is that the answer will find its way into the Mapping Highlevel doc, which is why I am asking it in the first place. This is on Windows using a 32-bit version of LLVM llc v3.4 (built about a week ago). I searched the LR, the FAQ, and Google but found nothing of relevance. -- Mikael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... U...

...ansformation is exposing it to the optimizer. > > Why do you consider this to be a pessimization? Does one produce inferior machine code? I consider it a pessimization as it is one additional instruction and I'm mainly interested in target independent optimizations because I regenerate highlevel code from it ("Exporting 3D scenes from Maya to WebGL using clang and llvm"). For example from the given code before the transformation I can easily regenerate myGlobal ? 1.0f : -1.0f while after the transformation I get (myGlobal & 1) != 0 ? 1.0f : -1.0f which is not good for shadin...

...iables (llvm specific), in order to maintain consistent behaviour when using this information with anyother simulator, it would be better if these predicates have syntax very similar (or exactly) as that of the high level language. The questions are: 1. Is it possible to somehow intersperse IR and highlevel code of the program (in C or C++). 2. Is it possible to incorporate some optimizations using llvm-gcc to make the generated IR very close to the high level language, without affecting the branch information. Suggestions and answers are welcome. Regards Prabhat -------------- next part -----------...

Dear all, I want my PhD thesis which I hand in tomorrow to look even nicer: Does polymap in the splancs library not allow horizontal plotting of y-labels? I have tried polymap(studyarea, xlab = "x (m)", ylab = "y (m)", las = 1) but it doesn't change the labels? Mayby some function in library(spatstat) support las? Thanks! Sincerely, Tord

...8* getelementptr inbounds ([5 x i8]* @.str1, >> i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind >> ret i32 0 >> } >> >> declare i32 @printf(i8* nocapture readonly, ...) nounwind >> >> A good thing about this question is that the answer will find its way >> into the Mapping Highlevel doc, which is why I am asking it in the first >> place. >> >> This is on Windows using a 32-bit version of LLVM llc v3.4 (built about a >> week ago). >> >> I searched the LR, the FAQ, and Google but found nothing of relevance. >> >> > You're mi...

...- decode codebooks - decode floors - decode residues - decode mappings - decode modes - read (packets) as audio packet: - header - 'packet decode' floor curves - 'packet decode' residues - synthesise I.e. a bit more highlevel structure to the docs would be cool and provide a lot of clarity. The lowlevel pseudocode is great and highly readable, but I did notice that somewhere halfway (after decoding the headers) the style changed quite a bit leading me to suspect two authors at work. * The second part (packet decode...

...ne (on llvm ir) llvm ir -> selection dag lower combine legalize combine ... I wonder if there is duplicate code in instCombine (on llvm ir, e.g. llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp) and combine on selection dag, and worst of all I can't use lower since I write llvm ir into highlevel code (like CBackend) and therefore have to implement my own lower. Or do you a better idea for this? -Jochen

...gt; i8]* @.str, i32 0, i32 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([5 x i8]* @.str1, > i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind > ret i32 0 > } > > declare i32 @printf(i8* nocapture readonly, ...) nounwind > > A good thing about this question is that the answer will find its way into > the Mapping Highlevel doc, which is why I am asking it in the first place. > > This is on Windows using a 32-bit version of LLVM llc v3.4 (built about a > week ago). > > I searched the LR, the FAQ, and Google but found nothing of relevance. > > You're missing the cast, IMHO. The cast appeases th...

...lower > combine > legalize > combine > ... > > I wonder if there is duplicate code in instCombine (on llvm ir, e.g. > llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp) > and combine on selection dag, and worst of all I can't use > lower since I write llvm ir into highlevel code (like CBackend) > and therefore have to implement my own lower. Or do you > a better idea for this? > > -Jochen The same passes would be beneficial for my PTX backend implementation(also like Cbackend). Are there reasons for not implementing them on the llvm ir? Is the current im...

...e optimizer. > > > > Why do you consider this to be a pessimization? Does one produce > inferior machine code? > > I consider it a pessimization as it is one additional instruction and > I'm mainly interested in target > independent optimizations because I regenerate highlevel code from it > ("Exporting 3D scenes from Maya to WebGL using clang and llvm"). > For example from the given code before the transformation I can easily > regenerate > myGlobal ? 1.0f : -1.0f > while after the transformation I get > (myGlobal & 1) != 0 ? 1.0f : -1.0f...

...e than 255. I realize this involves increasing the storage of some messages to and from the kernel in addition to kernel changes (from browsing the code), and was hopeful that someone might know what the correct solution would be or could point me in the right direction (like existing patches or a highlevel of what I need to change in the code). Additionally, I was curious how the ip *rule* system works in regards to matching -- is it a linear search or optimized in some way. Basically what I''m asking is if adding rules to a machine adds time to the whole system passing over various rules t...

I''d like to announce the second release of capistrano-runit-tasks, available from http://rubyforge.org/projects/cappy-runit/ It now supports: * File based templates * sv as the service control command in addition to runsvctrl * A much simpler interface for creating additional services. More work still needs to be done though! == TODO * Allow add_service to create more than one

...i8]* @.str1, >>> i32 0, i32 0)) nounwind >>> ret i32 0 >>> } >>> >>> declare i32 @printf(i8* nocapture readonly, ...) nounwind >>> >>> A good thing about this question is that the answer will find its way >>> into the Mapping Highlevel doc, which is why I am asking it in the first >>> place. >>> >>> This is on Windows using a 32-bit version of LLVM llc v3.4 (built about >>> a week ago). >>> >>> I searched the LR, the FAQ, and Google but found nothing of relevance. >>>...

On 2010-09-03 13:19, Jochen Wilhelmy wrote: > >>> Hi! >>> >>> The following thoughts about the llvm architecture I'd like to share >>> with you >>> (from the perspective of a user): >>> >>> - If a backend has no vector support, then I wonder why there is no >>> de-vectorization >>> pass that operates on

...2 0, i32 0)) nounwind >>>> ret i32 0 >>>> } >>>> >>>> declare i32 @printf(i8* nocapture readonly, ...) nounwind >>>> >>>> A good thing about this question is that the answer will find its way >>>> into the Mapping Highlevel doc, which is why I am asking it in the first >>>> place. >>>> >>>> This is on Windows using a 32-bit version of LLVM llc v3.4 (built about >>>> a week ago). >>>> >>>> I searched the LR, the FAQ, and Google but found nothing of...

...t;>>> ret i32 0 >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> declare i32 @printf(i8* nocapture readonly, ...) nounwind >>>>> >>>>> A good thing about this question is that the answer will find its way >>>>> into the Mapping Highlevel doc, which is why I am asking it in the first >>>>> place. >>>>> >>>>> This is on Windows using a 32-bit version of LLVM llc v3.4 (built >>>>> about a week ago). >>>>> >>>>> I searched the LR, the FAQ, and Goo...

> On 12/08/2016 08:45 PM, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > What's the conclusion of your discussion? It seems you want some > > statistic before deciding whether to ripping the bitmap from the ABI, > > am I right? > > I think Andrea and David feel pretty strongly that we should remove the > bitmap, unless we have some data to support keeping it. I don't feel as >

> On 12/08/2016 08:45 PM, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > What's the conclusion of your discussion? It seems you want some > > statistic before deciding whether to ripping the bitmap from the ABI, > > am I right? > > I think Andrea and David feel pretty strongly that we should remove the > bitmap, unless we have some data to support keeping it. I don't feel as >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: information disclosure when using HTT Category: core Module: sys Announced: