search for: hidraw6

...usb 1-10: New USB device found, idVendor=050d, idProduct=0751 [136322.929486] usb 1-10: New USB device strings: Mfr=4, Product=20, SerialNumber=0 [136322.929489] usb 1-10: Product: Belkin UPS [136322.929491] usb 1-10: Manufacturer: Belkin [136323.695058] hid-generic 0003:050D:0751.0008: hiddev0,hidraw6: USB HID v1.11 Device [Belkin Belkin UPS] on usb-0000:00:02.0-10/input0 So is this usb-0000:00:02.0-10/input0 a valid way to give nut a path to it, and if so, what file do I add that too? I also note that in the original bootup discovery it was hiddev0/hidraw6, the same as the latest plug in...

Check /dev/hidraw6, as noted in your dmesg output (and any other *hid* devices under /dev). User nut has almost zero privs to devices unless a udev rule changes the perms on the dev for nut . . . On November 9, 2024 1:25:29 PM EST, Bill Gee <bgee at campercaver.net> wrote: >Nut should be running as user nu...

On Nov 9, 2024, at 8:09?PM, Tim Dawson <tadawson at tpcsvc.com> wrote: > > Check /dev/hidraw6, as noted in your dmesg output (and any other *hid* devices under /dev). User nut has almost zero privs to devices unless a udev rule changes the perms on the dev for nut . . . I admit I am not fully tracking the latest NUT developments, but I don't think the current drivers use /dev/hidraw*,...

On Oct 12, 2014, at 8:28 PM, Gene Heskett <gheskett at wdtv.com> wrote: > Its unk because whats plugged in seems to be blocking the rear name plate. > About all I can recall is that its big, 3 battery unit, rated somewhere > north ob 1250 VA. > > Its an 050D:0751 Belkin. > > What driver should I use, and what file is that set in? Looks like it is in usbhid-ups. If

Greetings; Its unk because whats plugged in seems to be blocking the rear name plate. About all I can recall is that its big, 3 battery unit, rated somewhere north ob 1250 VA. Its an 050D:0751 Belkin. What driver should I use, and what file is that set in? The nut version presently and freshly installed is from the Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS repo's. Probably old, but IIRC it also worked with

...+ 1 root dialout 189, 3 Nov 10 09:43 004 ================== That looks to me like the udev rule worked. =============== Bill Gee On 11/10/24 08:38, Charles Lepple via Nut-upsuser wrote: > On Nov 9, 2024, at 8:09?PM, Tim Dawson <tadawson at tpcsvc.com> wrote: >> >> Check /dev/hidraw6, as noted in your dmesg output (and any other *hid* >> devices under /dev). User nut has almost zero privs to devices unless >> a udev rule changes the perms on the dev for nut . . . > > I admit I am not fully tracking the latest NUT developments, but I don't > think t...

...============ > > That looks to me like the udev rule worked. > > =============== > Bill Gee > > On 11/10/24 08:38, Charles Lepple via Nut-upsuser wrote: > > On Nov 9, 2024, at 8:09?PM, Tim Dawson <tadawson at tpcsvc.com> wrote: > >> > >> Check /dev/hidraw6, as noted in your dmesg output (and any other *hid* > >> devices under /dev). User nut has almost zero privs to devices unless > >> a udev rule changes the perms on the dev for nut . . . > > > > I admit I am not fully tracking the latest NUT developments, but I don'...

...=0001 [45798.124667] usb 1-3: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 [45798.124668] usb 1-3: Product: Evolis signature pad SIG100 [45798.124670] usb 1-3: Manufacturer: signotec [45798.124671] usb 1-3: SerialNumber: 1000215169 [45798.127190] hid-generic 0003:2133:0001.0020: hiddev0,hidraw6: USB HID v1.11 Device [signotec Evolis signature pad SIG100] on usb-0000:00:14.0-3/input0 Greg

...I looked through /dev/ but did not see a device that jumps out as the UPS. ===================== [root at mythtv rules.d]# dmesg | grep -i 0764 [ 2.021485] usb 1-1.8: New USB device found, idVendor=0764, idProduct=0501, bcdDevice= 0.01 [ 2.049515] hid-generic 0003:0764:0501.0007: hiddev98,hidraw6: USB HID v1.10 Device [CPS UPS CP1000AVRLCD] on usb-0000:00:1d.0-1.8/input0 [root at mythtv rules.d]# [root at mythtv rules.d]# ll 62* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4541 Jan 23 2024 62-multipath.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 184 Apr 2 2024 62-nut-ipmipsu.rules -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15921 Apr 2 2...

...; =============== > Bill Gee > > On 11/10/24 08:38, Charles Lepple via Nut-upsuser wrote: > > On Nov 9, 2024, at 8:09?PM, Tim Dawson <tadawson at tpcsvc.com > <mailto:tadawson at tpcsvc.com>> wrote: > >> > >> Check /dev/hidraw6, as noted in your dmesg output (and any other > *hid* > >> devices under /dev). User nut has almost zero privs to devices > unless > >> a udev rule changes the perms on the dev for nut . . . > > > > I admit I am not fully tracking the...

Hi, On 29-01-19 23:16, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > Please forgive me for being off topic and really off list !!! > > I am trying to get a Sig100 signature pad to work with Centos 7.6 machine and am not > getting much support from the manufacturer. The product is sold as linux compatible, but > so far it is not. I have been able to download their software on a

On Nov 11, 2014, at 9:41 PM, Gene Heskett <gheskett at wdtv.com> wrote: > Can't claim USB device [050d:0751]: could not detach kernel driver from > interface 0: Operation not permitted > Driver failed to start (exit status=1) > > In /dev/ttyUSB0 is owned by root. /dev/usb/hiddev3, the last one, has a > slow data marching out of it if I sudo cat /etc/dev/usb/hiddev3

...Bill Gee > > > > On 11/10/24 08:38, Charles Lepple via Nut-upsuser wrote: > > > On Nov 9, 2024, at 8:09?PM, Tim Dawson <tadawson at tpcsvc.com > > <mailto:tadawson at tpcsvc.com>> wrote: > > >> > > >> Check /dev/hidraw6, as noted in your dmesg output (and any other > > *hid* > > >> devices under /dev). User nut has almost zero privs to devices > > unless > > >> a udev rule changes the perms on the dev for nut . . . > > > > > > I admi...

Greetings Charles; Following the chapter 6, configuration notes, and having configured everything I had done previously in the repo built /etc/nut directory without any success previously, I found when trying: /usr/local/ups/upsdvrctl start, It reported it couldn't open /usr/local/ups/etc/ups.conf So I copied what I had done before to that path by mv'ing them with mc. Then I checked

Did the upgrade by chance install/alter any udev rules causing the UPS devices to now have incorrect permissions? And what user is nut running as? On November 9, 2024 9:58:57 AM EST, Bill Gee <bgee at campercaver.net> wrote: >Running NUT version 2.8.2 on Fedora 40. NUT installed from the Fedora package. CyberPower CP1000AVRLCD connected by USB. > >I updated the system yesterday