search for: hi2

...that leverages existing R functionality? I feel like the hack below is pretty clunky and can be sped up on the true dataset. I would like to run a more efficient script many times adjusting the value of 'per'. ts <- 1:1000 examp <- data.frame(ts=ts, stage=sin(ts)) hi1 <- list() hi2 <- list() per <- 7 elev1 <- 0.6 elev2 <- 0.85 for(i in per:nrow(examp)){ examp_per <- examp[seq(i - (per - 1), i, by=1),] stg_hi_cond1 <- subset(examp_per, examp_per$stage > elev1) stg_hi_cond2 <- subset(examp_per, examp_per$stage > elev2) hi1 <- c(hi1...

...t;getOperand(0), InL, InH); SDValue NVBitsNode = DAG.getConstant(NVTBits, ShTy); SDValue Amt2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, dl, ShTy, NVBitsNode, Amt); SDValue Cmp = DAG.getSetCC(dl, TLI.getSetCCResultType(ShTy), Amt, NVBitsNode, ISD::SETULT); SDValue Lo1, Hi1, Lo2, Hi2; switch (N->getOpcode()) { default: llvm_unreachable("Unknown shift"); case ISD::SHL: // ShAmt < NVTBits Lo1 = DAG.getConstant(0, NVT); // Low part is zero. Hi1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SHL, dl, NVT, InL, Amt); // High part from Lo part. // ShAmt &g...

On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Javier Martinez <javier at jmartinez.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working in adding support for 64-bit integers to my target. I'm using > LLVM to decompose the 64-bit integer operations by using 32-bit registers > wherever possible and emulating support where not. When looking at the bit > shift decomposition I saw what seems to be a

Can any one help it will be very kind, loop statements I have this table and some more records, I want to reshape it V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 TP53 Dis1 Dis2 Dis3 Dis4 Dis5 Dis6 DCI New1 New2 New3 New4 FDI Hi2 H3 H4 GHD I1 I3 I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 I want my new table or matrix to be some thing like this V1 V2 V3 Tp53 Dis1 Dis2 Tp53 Dis1 Dis3 Tp53 Dis1 Dis4 Tp53 Dis1 Dis5 Tp53 Dis1 Dis6 Tp53 Dis2 Dis3 Tp53 Dis2 Dis4 Tp53 Dis2 Dis5 Tp53 Dis2 Dis6 Tp53 Dis3 Dis4 Tp53 Dis3 Dis5 Tp53 Dis3 Dis6 Tp53 Dis4 Dis5 Tp53...

...ates based on dat1: xmin <- 0.01715686 alpha <- 2.381581 I then simply wanted to print the observed and fitted dists in one plot, so I ran: library(ggplot2) library(VGAM) dat2 <- rpareto(length(dat1), location=xmin, shape=alpha) hi1 <- hist(dat1, plot=FALSE, breaks="FD") hi2 <- hist(dat2, plot=FALSE, breaks="FD") y1 <- hi1$counts/sum(hi1$counts) y2 <- hi2$counts/sum(hi2$counts) x1 <- hi1$mids x2 <- hi2$mids qplot() + geom_line(aes(x=x1,y=y1)) + geom_line(aes(x=x2,y=y2), color="red") y1.c <- rev(cumsum(rev(y1))) y2.c <- rev(c...

Hi, I want to use the value of variable to quote elements in matrix. For example, I have a matrix like:               y1   y2m1         1      2m2         3      4 where y1,y2,m1,m2 are column and row names.  I have two random character variable, say x,  that could be either  y1 or y2  and  y that could be either m1 or m2.  So can I  do like   Matrix[y,x] to quote elements?  I've tried this

...%lo1 = shufflevector <4 x i1> %16, <4 x i1> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1> %hi1 = shufflevector <4 x i1> %16, <4 x i1> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 2, i32 3> %join = or <2 x i1> %lo1, %hi1 %lo2 = extractelement <2 x i1> %join, i32 0 %hi2 = extractelement <2 x i1> %join, i32 1 %final = or i1 %lo2, %hi2 Currently I would expect the code generators to produce something nasty for this. Feel free to open a bugreport requesting that the code generators do something better. Ciao, Duncan. > > Or do I need to resort to cal...

Hi all, llvm newbie here. I'm trying to branch based on a vector compare. I've found a slow way (below) which goes through memory. Is there some idiom I'm missing so that it would use for instance movmsk for SSE or vcmpgt & cr6 for altivec? Or do I need to resort to calling the intrinsic directly? Thanks, Stephen. %16 = fcmp ogt <4 x float> %15, %cr %17 =

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass? > I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would > mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction > and just deleting code for handling its Expand and Promote. Are you > anticipating something more

On May 20, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Eli Friedman > <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector >> >> operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from >> >> LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant

...ue LHSLo, LHSHi, RHSLo, RHSHi; - ExpandOp(LHS, LHSLo, LHSHi); - ExpandOp(RHS, RHSLo, RHSHi); - ISD::CondCode CCCode = cast<CondCodeSDNode>(CC)->get(); - - if (VT==MVT::ppcf128) { - // FIXME: This generated code sucks. We want to generate - // FCMPU crN, hi1, hi2 - // BNE crN, L: - // FCMPU crN, lo1, lo2 - // The following can be improved, but not that much. - Tmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(dl, TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), - LHSHi, RHSHi, ISD::SETOEQ); - Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(dl, TLI.getS...