search for: hgst

...t;smaller disk space. For the price of a 1TB 2.5", I can get at least a 4TB WD Red. > > I will second Marks comments here. Yes, 2.5" drive enterprise drives have been an issue. +1 for the WD Red drives, so far 3.5" w/ 2tb and 4tb drives, ZERO issues. I've had good luck with HGST NAS drives too. Unfortunately, that will come to an end soon (With WD owning HGST). Most servers can fit only 2.5" disks these days. I keep wondering what everyone is doing about storage.

...-- ID | Type | Drive Model | Size | Status Miloslav> | Speed | Temp | Slot ID | LSI ID Miloslav> c0u0p0 | HDD | SEAGATE ST900MP0006 N003WAG0Q3S3 | 837.8 Gb | Online, Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 53C | [8:14] | 32 Miloslav> c0u1p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV250TJ | 558.4 Gb | Online, Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 38C | [8:0] | 12 Miloslav> c0u2p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV3XT4J | 558.4 Gb | Online, Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 43C | [8:1] | 11 Miloslav> c0u3p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A...

...rive Model | Size | Status > Miloslav> | Speed | Temp | Slot ID | LSI ID > Miloslav> c0u0p0 | HDD | SEAGATE ST900MP0006 N003WAG0Q3S3 | 837.8 Gb | Online, > Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 53C | [8:14] | 32 > Miloslav> c0u1p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV250TJ | 558.4 Gb | Online, > Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 38C | [8:0] | 12 > Miloslav> c0u2p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV3XT4J | 558.4 Gb | Online, > Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 43C | [8:1] | 11 > Miloslav> c0u3p0 | HDD | HGST...

.../dev/sdr | None |None -- Disk information -- -- ID | Type | Drive Model | Size | Status | Speed | Temp | Slot ID | LSI ID c0u0p0 | HDD | SEAGATE ST900MP0006 N003WAG0Q3S3 | 837.8 Gb | Online, Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 53C | [8:14] | 32 c0u1p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV250TJ | 558.4 Gb | Online, Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 38C | [8:0] | 12 c0u2p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV3XT4J | 558.4 Gb | Online, Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 43C | [8:1] | 11 c0u3p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 ADB05ZG4XLZU | 558.4 Gb | Online, Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s...

...rive Model?????????????????????? | Size???? | Status > Miloslav>?????? | Speed????| Temp | Slot ID??| LSI ID > Miloslav> c0u0p0??| HDD??| SEAGATE ST900MP0006 N003WAG0Q3S3??| 837.8 Gb | Online, > Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 53C??| [8:14]?? | 32 > Miloslav> c0u1p0??| HDD??| HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV250TJ | 558.4 Gb | Online, > Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 38C??| [8:0]????| 12 > Miloslav> c0u2p0??| HDD??| HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV3XT4J | 558.4 Gb | Online, > Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 43C??| [8:1]????| 11 > Miloslav> c0u3p0??| HDD??| HGST...

Still have good quality older sata hardware raid cards that require 512 bytes/sector. As far as I know HD manufacturers are not making native 512 bytes/sector drives any more. Some have better 512e emulation than others. Looking for some advice on which to avoid and which are recommended. Thanks. PS this is for a CentOS6 server.

...lav> -- ID | Type | Drive Model | Size | Status Miloslav> | Speed | Temp | Slot ID | LSI ID Miloslav> c0u0p0 | HDD | SEAGATE ST900MP0006 N003WAG0Q3S3 | 837.8 Gb | Online, Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 53C | [8:14] | 32 Miloslav> c0u1p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV250TJ | 558.4 Gb | Online, Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 38C | [8:0] | 12 Miloslav> c0u2p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 A3800XV3XT4J | 558.4 Gb | Online, Miloslav> Spun Up | 12.0Gb/s | 43C | [8:1] | 11 Miloslav> c0u3p0 | HDD | HGST HUC156060CSS200 ADB...

...good quality older sata hardware raid cards that require 512 > > bytes/sector. As far as I know HD manufacturers are not making native 512 > > bytes/sector drives any more. > > 512n drives still exist, although they tend to be a bit smaller, 2TB or > less. > > http://www.hgst.com/tech/techlib.nsf/techdocs/FD3F376DC2ECCE68882579D40082C393/$file/US7K4000_ds.pdf > > I too noticed that HGST (now owned by WD) makes native 512n drives. That pdf states that they come in 2,3,4 TB models. (A6 in the model # represents 512n). But there are almost no reviews on these HGST na...

...I can get at least a 4TB WD Red. >>> >>> I will second Marks comments here. Yes, 2.5" drive enterprise drives >>> have been an issue. +1 for the WD Red drives, so far 3.5" w/ 2tb and >>> 4tb >>> drives, ZERO issues. I've had good luck with HGST NAS drives too. >>> Unfortunately, that will come to an end soon (With WD owning HGST). >> >> Most servers can fit only 2.5" disks these days. I keep wondering what >> everyone is doing about storage. > > Ignoring existence of 2.5 inch, and getting rackmount m...

hw wrote: > Richard Zimmerman wrote: >> DO NOT buy the newer HPE DL20 gen9 or ML10 gen9 servers then (especially >> if using CentOS 6.x) > > What would you suggest as alternative, something from Dell? Yep, Dell's are good. And I do *not* want to buy from HP, because their support is nothing like good. And once you run out the warranty, they don't want to even let you

...ail.com> wrote: > Still have good quality older sata hardware raid cards that require 512 > bytes/sector. As far as I know HD manufacturers are not making native 512 > bytes/sector drives any more. 512n drives still exist, although they tend to be a bit smaller, 2TB or less. http://www.hgst.com/tech/techlib.nsf/techdocs/FD3F376DC2ECCE68882579D40082C393/$file/US7K4000_ds.pdf 4Kn drives are appearing now also. I don't expect these drives to be bootable except possibly by systems with UEFI firmware. It's also possible hardware RAID will reject them unless explicitly supported....

...s, and >smaller disk space. For the price of a 1TB 2.5", I can get at least a 4TB WD Red. I will second Marks comments here. Yes, 2.5" drive enterprise drives have been an issue. +1 for the WD Red drives, so far 3.5" w/ 2tb and 4tb drives, ZERO issues. I've had good luck with HGST NAS drives too. Unfortunately, that will come to an end soon (With WD owning HGST). Regards, Richard

...gt; price of a 1TB 2.5", I can get at least a 4TB WD Red. >> >> I will second Marks comments here. Yes, 2.5" drive enterprise drives >> have been an issue. +1 for the WD Red drives, so far 3.5" w/ 2tb and 4tb >> drives, ZERO issues. I've had good luck with HGST NAS drives too. >> Unfortunately, that will come to an end soon (With WD owning HGST). > > Most servers can fit only 2.5" disks these days. I keep wondering what > everyone is doing about storage. Ignoring existence of 2.5 inch, and getting rackmount machines with with 3.5 inc...

...e price of a 1TB 2.5", I can get at least a 4TB WD Red. >> >> I will second Marks comments here. Yes, 2.5" drive enterprise drives >> have been an issue. +1 for the WD Red drives, so far 3.5" w/ 2tb and >> 4tb drives, ZERO issues. I've had good luck with HGST NAS drives too. >> Unfortunately, that will come to an end soon (With WD owning HGST). > > Most servers can fit only 2.5" disks these days.? I keep wondering what > everyone is doing about storage. 2.5" SAS drives spinning at 10k and 15k RPM are the performance solution...

...TB 2.5", I can get at least a 4TB WD Red. >>> >>> I will second Marks comments here. Yes, 2.5" drive enterprise drives >>> have been an issue. +1 for the WD Red drives, so far 3.5" w/ 2tb and >>> 4tb drives, ZERO issues. I've had good luck with HGST NAS drives too. >>> Unfortunately, that will come to an end soon (With WD owning HGST). >> >> Most servers can fit only 2.5" disks these days.? I keep wondering what >> everyone is doing about storage. > > > 2.5" SAS drives spinning at 10k and 15k RPM a...

...;> 1TB 2.5", I can get at least a 4TB WD Red. >> >> >> I will second Marks comments here. Yes, 2.5" drive enterprise drives have >> been an issue. +1 for the WD Red drives, so far 3.5" w/ 2tb and 4tb drives, >> ZERO issues. I've had good luck with HGST NAS drives too. Unfortunately, >> that will come to an end soon (With WD owning HGST). > > > Most servers can fit only 2.5" disks these days. I keep wondering what > everyone is doing about storage. > The 2.5 inch drives have a pretty good lifetime these days and seem to...

...gt; price of a 1TB 2.5", I can get at least a 4TB WD Red. >> >> I will second Marks comments here. Yes, 2.5" drive enterprise drives >> have been an issue. +1 for the WD Red drives, so far 3.5" w/ 2tb and 4tb >> drives, ZERO issues. I've had good luck with HGST NAS drives too. >> Unfortunately, that will come to an end soon (With WD owning HGST). > > Most servers can fit only 2.5" disks these days. I keep wondering what > everyone is doing about storage. Sorry, that depends 100% on what you *order*. We tell our resellers that we want...

...a 4TB WD Red. >>>> >>>> I will second Marks comments here. Yes, 2.5" drive enterprise drives >>>> have been an issue. +1 for the WD Red drives, so far 3.5" w/ 2tb and >>>> 4tb >>>> drives, ZERO issues. I've had good luck with HGST NAS drives too. >>>> Unfortunately, that will come to an end soon (With WD owning HGST). >>> >>> Most servers can fit only 2.5" disks these days. I keep wondering what >>> everyone is doing about storage. >> >> Ignoring existence of 2.5 inch,...

...TB 2.5", I can get at least a 4TB WD Red. >>> >>> I will second Marks comments here. Yes, 2.5" drive enterprise drives >>> have been an issue. +1 for the WD Red drives, so far 3.5" w/ 2tb and 4tb >>> drives, ZERO issues. I've had good luck with HGST NAS drives too. >>> Unfortunately, that will come to an end soon (With WD owning HGST). >> >> Most servers can fit only 2.5" disks these days. I keep wondering what >> everyone is doing about storage. > > Sorry, that depends 100% on what you *order*. We tell o...

Hello all. Our Gluster 9.6 cluster is showing increasing problems. Currently it's composed of 3 servers (2x Intel Xeon 4210 [20 cores dual thread, total 40 threads], 192GB RAM, 30x HGST HUH721212AL5200 [12TB]), configured in replica 3 arbiter 1. Using Debian packages from Gluster 9.x latest repository. Seems 192G RAM are not enough to handle 30 data bricks + 15 arbiters and I often had to reload glusterfsd because glusterfs processed got killed for OOM. On top of that, perfor...