search for: hex_digit

...is bad for binary size, and also confuses the symbolizer, because > f and f.cfi-jt have the same address (unless f is undefined) and there > is basically a 50% chance to see f.cfi-jt instead of f in cfi error > messages. > Function names can also receive other suffixes, such as "$hex_digits" or ".llvm.hex_digits" for promoted local symbols, and I don't see a way around at least those two. We may need to teach the symbolizer to strip the suffixes. We may be able to avoid having both the non-.cfi-jt and .cfi-jt symbol by emitting only the .cfi-jt symbol for symbols...

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > Thanks for sending this out. A few comments below. > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Evgenii Stepanov via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> this is a proposal for the implementation of CFI-icall [1] with ThinLTO. >> >>