search for: hermi

Dear Nikos, thanks! But you use Opus only for resampling, not for entirely replacing Speex, don't you? Greetings! Hermie Am 07.05.2013 22:53, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: > The Opus resampler is actually a bugfixed version of the Speex one. Same > interface/API, but with the bugs removed. It's why I recommended it :-) > Otherwise I would have recommended something entirely different, like > SoXR....

My file is 3 hours long, so decoding takes around 5 minutes on an average computer. That is a bit too long unfortunately... Am 23.12.2011 20:38, schrieb Steve Checkoway: > On Dec 23, 2011, at 10:54, Hermann Weber<hermie.weber at gmx.de> wrote: > >> And how many frames does Speex need to "recover"? >> Or is that not predictable? > No idea. My guess is not predictable. You have all of the data, why not decode it all? >

...(ST-CO/ENG1.3)) > 7. Re: opus file trimming/clipping (Matt Ruck) > 8. Re: Exact audio position (Ian Malone) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 07:43:55 +0200 > From: Hermann Weber <hermie.weber at gmx.de> > Subject: [opus] opus_demo produces garbage > To: opus at xiph.org > Message-ID: <51907D9B.50803 at gmx.de> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hello! > > I am running opus_demo.exe with the following cmds: > >...

...V4I)' The project configuration dimension name/value "(Platform, Win32)" was not found in the project manifest. Is it possible to compile the libspeex.dll without support for Windows Mobile 5.0, or is there no other way? I am afraid of messing anything up by install it. Greetings! Hermie Am 07.05.2013 16:03, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: > On 07/05/13 13:07, Hermann Weber wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I would like to know if it is possible to request encoding to a higher >> samplerate than the original data. >> For example my uncompressed data was 22 kHz, a...

...us frames) to generate the output samples. If you skip the previous frames, the decoder state memory will not be the same (as when you do full decoding) which causes the output to be different. > I hope this helps. > L. > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Hermann Weber <hermie.weber at gmx.de> wrote: > > Hello! > > I am still using version 1.0.4. > > When I have encoded a larger file and then only want to decode only one > frame from it (for example the 2nd frame), is there anything special > that I have to keep i...

And how many frames does Speex need to "recover"? Or is that not predictable? Greetings, Hermann Am 23.12.2011 19:17, schrieb Steve Checkoway: > > On Dec 23, 2011, at 10:03 , Hermann Weber wrote: > >> I found out something: >> >> The more frames I decode before the frame that I actually want to >> decode, the better the quality becomes. >> For

...s possible to request encoding to a higher samplerate than the original data. For example my uncompressed data was 22 kHz, and I would now like to decode the compressed data to 48 kHz (to feed it to a filter which expects a high "input" format). Is this possible with Speex? Thank you. Hermie

...ld them without issues. The license is a two clause BSD-style permissive one, so you can do that. On 08/05/13 07:38, Hermann Weber wrote: > Dear Nikos, > > thanks! > But you use Opus only for resampling, not for entirely replacing Speex, > don't you? > > Greetings! > Hermie > > Am 07.05.2013 22:53, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: >> The Opus resampler is actually a bugfixed version of the Speex one. Same >> interface/API, but with the bugs removed. It's why I recommended it :-) >> Otherwise I would have recommended something entirely diffe...

...cared because Opus look so much different than Speex, and there is no "encoding/decoding for dummies" example as there was in Speex. Could anybody perhaps give me another push in the right direction and tell me how a good starting point for Opus newbies? Thank you so much. Greetings, Hermie

...tate prior to processing FRAME 2. - In case 2, the decoder has its state reset to the default state. - In case 1, the decoder memory state has been modified by the processing of FRAME 1. If I got it wrong, please provide more details. L. On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Hermann Weber <hermie.weber at gmx.de> wrote: > Sorry, it seems I have only replied to Lakhdar, not to the newsgroup. > Below is my reply to Lakhdar, and I would like to make it more clear > now, using some pseudo values for simplicity: > > I read bytes 1 to 124 from my encoded spx file. > I decod...

...Am 23.12.2011 20:49, schrieb Hermann Weber: > My file is 3 hours long, so decoding takes around 5 minutes on an > average computer. > That is a bit too long unfortunately... > > > Am 23.12.2011 20:38, schrieb Steve Checkoway: >> On Dec 23, 2011, at 10:54, Hermann Weber<hermie.weber at gmx.de> wrote: >> >>> And how many frames does Speex need to "recover"? >>> Or is that not predictable? >> No idea. My guess is not predictable. You have all of the data, why not decode it all? >> > ____________________________________...

...dimension name/value "(Platform, Win32)" was > not found in the project manifest. > > Is it possible to compile the libspeex.dll without support for Windows > Mobile 5.0, or is there no other way? > I am afraid of messing anything up by install it. > > Greetings! > Hermie > > Am 07.05.2013 16:03, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: >> On 07/05/13 13:07, Hermann Weber wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> I would like to know if it is possible to request encoding to a higher >>> samplerate than the original data. >>> For example m...

...uide_, from O'Reilly. ISBN 1565926609 Developers: _Secure Programming Cookbook for C and C++_, also from ORA. ISBN 0596003943** General Interest: _Cuckoo's Egg_, by Cliff Stoll. ISBN 0743411463 So, head out to your favorite bookstore and join #asterisk-bookclub! See ya on IRC, Nick (IRC hermie)

Nick Bachmann <nabachmann@yahoo.com> wrote: > I am trying to run YDKJv3 on Wine. I have successfully installed it, > and I am able to run it with Wine HQ and Codeweavers Wine. The problems > with both of these is that I can't use they keyboard! Pressing keys has > no effect. > > I have searched wine lists and bugs, and it looks like I'm not the only > one

Hello! I need to extract audio data at a certain position in respect to the original audio data. Is the "-cbr" switch meant to ensure that data can be found on a specific position? I want to be able to predict where certain audio can be found in the encoded data. An example: If you put 10 apples into a box and then compress the box, you will not be able to predict where apple C

Hello! I encoded a voice file (48kHz) with opusbin\opusenc.exe with the standard settings and decoded it. The output was amazing. I could not hear any loss at all. Then i encoded the same file with opus_demo.exe and standard settings and then decoded it. The output had a sizzling noise, even when I used full bandwidth. I think I have played around with any of the settings in opus_demo.exe,

Right now I have a Shorewall firewall protecting a local network with a VPN tunnel between a remote subnet. In total I have 3 zones; net, vpn, and loc. I want to know if it is possible to add a wireless NIC to my server and have it act as a wireless access point for my laptop. I would want to use a separate zone for the wireless client(s) and I would plan on using an encrypted IPSEC tunnel

Hello! I am still using version 1.0.4. When I have encoded a larger file and then only want to decode only one frame from it (for example the 2nd frame), is there anything special that I have to keep in mind? I thought that I could simply read the bytes from the encoded file for example from the start position of the 2nd frame and then decode it. I did that, and I can play it play, but the

It would be nice to get more input. I am really lost because I am not sure what is going on here, and there are no sources to investigate on. Thank you. Hermann Am 22.12.2011 20:55, schrieb Hermann Weber: > To make it complete, here is the code that I am using to encode a large > file: > > int __stdcall SpxEncode(unsigned char* inBuf, unsigned char* outBuf, > unsigned int inlen)

Hi all, I'm using Wine 20050930 on Gentoo Linux. I have successfully installed Warcraft III and got it working for the most part. I can't get the in game cinematics working. I had them working with Wine 200410??. Now all I get is a message about an invalid resolution. The movie scenes are 800x368 and I run the game at 800x600 using opengl. System specs: Toshiba Satellite 3000