search for: hennessi

I've been having problems since updating to samba 3.0.10 on Debian 3.1 Below is the output of ltrace and gdb on the offending smbd process. I tried upgrading to 3.0.11 and the problem still exists. Anyone have any suggestions? [ltrace output] After about 20 seconds on the processes ltrace loops this iconv(0x82cecc8, 0xbffff218, 0xbffff21c, 0xbffff220, 0xbffff224) = -1 __errno_location()

Hi, I'm using Asterisk with two Cisco 7960 phones using SIP. I'm seeing the following weird behavior: SIP Phome 1 is extension 4002 SIP Phone 2 is extension 4003 I call 4002 from 4003 and that works fine. I call 4003 from 4002, and it rings locally to 4002, never gets to 4003. I'm able to send a config query packet to 4003 from the asterisk console and get a response, when I send

Hello, I'm using two Cisco 7960 phones currently loaded and showing Firmware POS3-07-4-0 (Version 7.4?) and I'm having a strange problem. Whenever the phone is supposed to try to load anything over HTTP from my Apache 2.2.x web server, the connection just sits and times out. Nothing shows up in the Apache logs unless I hit cancel. What could the trouble be? -- Mark P. Hennessy

I'm trying to compile Linuxthreads from ports on my FreeBSD 4.8 system here, and for some reason I keep getting this: You can use an experimental patch to reduce the number of condition variable triggered context switches by defining WITH_CONDWAIT_PATCH Some unsafe calls to exit() can be detected by defining LINUXTHREADS_DETECT_UNSAFE_EXIT, see files/README.FreeBSD for more info. ===>

I have this same problem on 3.0.10, and I also "fixed" it by deleting the tdbs. My problem, had nothing to do with printing, it was happening once I started winbindd with security = ADS. Jerry, what would we need to do to track this bug down in the tdb code? I have logs at level 10, ltrace output, and a backtrace. Do you think that there were changes made to the tdb code in 3.0.12

On Tuesday 05 August 2008 03:27, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Aug 4, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Shrutarshi Basu wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'm a rising sophomore CS/Engineering student in the US and I'm > > interested in programming languages/ compilers.I think the LLVM would Yay! We need more compiler people in this industry. :) This is actually a very good time to be getting

Hi, Our backend for Pixel Visual Core uses some MVT's that aren't upstream. Does it make sense to upstream them? I figure that as architectures get wider, we'll eventually have "all" possible combinations of widths and types, but on the other hand having code that isn't used by current backends in tree isn't great. These are the MVT's that we have added: 16x16

I am using shorewall 1.4.6a on redhat 9 Two interface. Using NAT 10.10.1.7 213.94.193.94 ---------------------------------------------------- Firewall gateway eth0: 213.94.193.89 eth1: 10.10.1.3 ---------------------------------------------------------- www server internal IP: 10.10.1.7 External IP: 213.94.193.94

In a fit of irony, while preparing to burn a CDROM with some software I've been writing for about six months, I did a rm *>o instead of rm *.o on an ext3 filesystem. And I'm well aware that under normal circumstance you can't undelete, especially a ext3 filesystem. However, I need to at least *try* to recover this. I've built lde (linux disk editor) and if I can isolate a

Hi Sean, I had to add ‘v16f16’ to our out-of-tree target, and this was to primarily to allow me to express lowering for all the OpenCL types (well, except for the ‘v3T’ types). The trend does seem to be towards larger bit-width SIMD registers, and as you say this will increase in time; but perhaps instead of using a discrete enumeration combined with additional entries in several

On Aug 4, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Shrutarshi Basu wrote: > Hello all, > I'm a rising sophomore CS/Engineering student in the US and I'm > interested in programming languages/ compilers.I think the LLVM would > be a great project for me to contribute to, both to learn something > and help the project. Unfortunately, I don't know much about > compilers, much less anything

Shorewall version 2.2.1 2 Interface setup. eth1: 10.10.1.3 eth0: 192.168.1.2 modem is 192.168.1.1 I need to be able to connect to my adsl modem, but when shorewall is up I get connection rejected. I have added "192.168.1.1 RETURN" above the line "192.168.0.0/16 logdrop # RFC 1918" in "/etc/shorewall/rfc1918" but still getting connection rejected Is there

I'm using Centos 4.5 right now, and I had a RAID 5 array stop because two drives became unavailable. After adjusting the cables on several occasions and shutting down and restarting, I was able to see the drives again. This is when I snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Please, someone with vast knowledge of how RAID 5 with mdadm works, tell me if I have any chance at all

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Martin J. O'Riordan <MartinO at theheart.ie> wrote: > Hi Sean, > > > > I had to add ‘v16f16’ to our out-of-tree target, and this was to > primarily to allow me to express lowering for all the OpenCL types (well, > except for the ‘v3T’ types). > > > > The trend does seem to be towards larger bit-width SIMD registers, and

Hello all, I'm a rising sophomore CS/Engineering student in the US and I'm interested in programming languages/ compilers.I think the LLVM would be a great project for me to contribute to, both to learn something and help the project. Unfortunately, I don't know much about compilers, much less anything which would allow me to make a significant contribution. I've started reading

Noted, Darren. Thanks for that. The compile option is interesting, I'll file that for next time. Resolution: Do the install under wine until it stops, kill it. Mounted a Windows hdd, copied the Lotus dir, not overwriting that which got left behind by the killed installation, chown and chmod the new files to similar to those installed by wine, works fine. Very simple, but means

Hello, Just installed shorewall 1.4.6a on Redhat 9. Using two-interface and NAT. Getting this error on starting shorewall Processing /etc/shorewall/ecn... Activating Rules... Adding IP Addresses... /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 317: [: 213.94.193.89: integer expression expected/usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 317: 32 - 213.94.193.89 : syntax error in expression (error token is

Hi, I''m looking to create tables from within rails, using mysql. Can I do this from within rails, or would I have to create a separate class that uses Mysql directly? Any tips highly appreciated, - Matt -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Thanks, Sam Short, Network Manager <mailto:sshort@ololrmc.com> sshort@ololrmc.com Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center 5000 Hennessy Blvd., Baton Rouge, LA 70808 Ph: (225) 765-8768 Fax: (225) 765-3202 ***Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center and affiliates encrypt email containing Patient Health Information. You will receive a notice with instructions on how to open

Hi, I''m trying to write a sidebar menu with dynamic menus, and to do so I would like to define a list of menus to display within my sidebar component controller code and pass that list to the component display view, like so: # menu_controller.rb class Sidebar::MenuController < ActionController::Base uses_component_template_root @menus = %w{admin user help} def display