Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "hend".
Did you mean:
end
2002 May 18
1
SCRATCH update wrong date, soft links, Debian stable, -L, ...
Hmm,
scratch the issue
I used touch on the file and now it works (even though it shouldn't have
made a difference). In short - maybe its not [purely anyway] rsync
related.
(From last post)
(Though 'newer' and 'stat' had already clearly showed it to be newer,
and though I had saved it to be sure it had a recent date - I tried
touch anyway. Still - newer said it was newer
2008 Jun 10
1
[LLVMdev] regression? Or did I do something wrong again?
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:25:42 +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Hi Hendrik,
>
> It seems the ConstantFP method get might have been modified to take a
> reference-to-APFloat, meaning you can't pass in APFloat(Value) anonymously.
> You should either put it in a local variable, like
> APFloat F(Val);
> return ConstantFP::get(Type::DoubleTy, F);
&...
2002 May 17
1
update wrong date, soft links, Debian stable, -L, ...
...n't know the special rules for
treating links and whether the -a option effects that still.
I'll have to admitt I haven't searched all 10MB of prev. questions.
Anyway, thanks - I get allot of mileage out of rsync: its a ton better
than writing a shell script using rcp :)
John Hendrickson
jdh@hend.net
johndhendrickson22124@yahoo.com
PS
My most desired feature is: If you use
user@host:/directory
notation right on host, rysnc won't grok it
(you gotta use /directory if your executing
on host).
That means scripts must be
different depen...
2018 Mar 10
17
[RFC PATCH 00/13] SVM (share virtual memory) with HMM in nouveau
From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse at redhat.com>
(mm is cced just to allow exposure of device driver work without ccing
a long list of peoples. I do not think there is anything usefull to
discuss from mm point of view but i might be wrong, so just for the
curious :)).
git://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/linux branch: nouveau-hmm-v00
2008 Aug 29
5
Wi-SIP vs. SIP-DECT
Anybody care to muse on Wi-SIP vs. SIP-DECT?
My limited research indicates that none of the WiSip phones will ever be
able to match the performance of DECT phones. Maybe I'm wrong but a
Wi-SIP phone seems like a DIESEL sports car. There is nothing wrong
with the technology, but it seems like a shoe-horned fit into the
requirements of a wireless endpoint. DECT uses a wireless radio layer