search for: hend

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "hend".

Did you mean: end
2002 May 18
1
SCRATCH update wrong date, soft links, Debian stable, -L, ...
Hmm, scratch the issue I used touch on the file and now it works (even though it shouldn't have made a difference). In short - maybe its not [purely anyway] rsync related. (From last post) (Though 'newer' and 'stat' had already clearly showed it to be newer, and though I had saved it to be sure it had a recent date - I tried touch anyway. Still - newer said it was newer
2008 Jun 10
1
[LLVMdev] regression? Or did I do something wrong again?
On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:25:42 +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > Hi Hendrik, > > It seems the ConstantFP method get might have been modified to take a > reference-to-APFloat, meaning you can't pass in APFloat(Value) anonymously. > You should either put it in a local variable, like > APFloat F(Val); > return ConstantFP::get(Type::DoubleTy, F); &...
2002 May 17
1
update wrong date, soft links, Debian stable, -L, ...
...n't know the special rules for treating links and whether the -a option effects that still. I'll have to admitt I haven't searched all 10MB of prev. questions. Anyway, thanks - I get allot of mileage out of rsync: its a ton better than writing a shell script using rcp :) John Hendrickson jdh@hend.net johndhendrickson22124@yahoo.com PS My most desired feature is: If you use user@host:/directory notation right on host, rysnc won't grok it (you gotta use /directory if your executing on host). That means scripts must be different depen...
2018 Mar 10
17
[RFC PATCH 00/13] SVM (share virtual memory) with HMM in nouveau
From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse at redhat.com> (mm is cced just to allow exposure of device driver work without ccing a long list of peoples. I do not think there is anything usefull to discuss from mm point of view but i might be wrong, so just for the curious :)). git://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/linux branch: nouveau-hmm-v00
2008 Aug 29
5
Wi-SIP vs. SIP-DECT
Anybody care to muse on Wi-SIP vs. SIP-DECT? My limited research indicates that none of the WiSip phones will ever be able to match the performance of DECT phones. Maybe I'm wrong but a Wi-SIP phone seems like a DIESEL sports car. There is nothing wrong with the technology, but it seems like a shoe-horned fit into the requirements of a wireless endpoint. DECT uses a wireless radio layer