search for: hence

...er restart Shutting down wondershaper Starting wondershaper Cannot find device "root" Error: Qdisc "1:" is classless. Error: Qdisc "1:1" is classless. Error: Qdisc "1:1" is classless. Error: Qdisc "1:1" is classless. Unknown qdisc "1:10", hence option "handle" is unparsable Unknown qdisc "1:20", hence option "handle" is unparsable Unknown qdisc "1:30", hence option "handle" is unparsable Unknown filter "1:0", hence option "protocol" is unparsable Unknown filter "1:...

...ting names of variables from the bitcode. The bitcode does contain debug metadata. The first problem is regarding `memtmp' variables (apparently, the original variable name is no longer present in the bitcode). The other two problems concern OpenMP. In one case, the instruction is not named and hence establishing a connection to the debug metadata does not seem possible. In the other case, I am noticing some extra fields present in the `omp_data_s' structure (these fields are not present in the source code) and hence the `alloca' does not match the metadata definition. Here are the det...

...perfomance problem. x <- matrix(c(1,0,0, 0,0,1, 0,1,0, 0,0,1, 0,1,0, 1,0,0),ncol=3,byrow=T) x [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 1 0 0 [2,] 0 0 1 [3,] 0 1 0 [4,] 0 0 1 [5,] 0 1 0 [6,] 1 0 0 In the matrix above, on the first row, the 1 is in column 1, hence '1' on the first row in the matrix below. On the second row in the matrix above, the 1 is in column 3, hence the '3' on the second row in the matrix below. And so on... y [,1] [1,] 1 [2,] 3 [3,] 2 [4,] 3 [5,] 2 [6,] 1

...ns - Xen''s and the guest kernel''s. I.e. we can''t make use of the hardware''s access control mechanisms, as we can''t put two I/O bit maps in place, and we (obviously) can''t run the guest kernel at IOPL 0. On PVH, otoh, we do have two bitmaps, and hence we could at least allow those port accesses to go without interception that Xen doesn''t need to do any internal state keeping on (and of course also only for those the guest is allowed to access). That would make - for PVH - unnecessary a significant part of emulate_privileged_op(): In ess...

...nverted to 8.3 syntax, so that i do not have any further problem while transporting those files over to other networks/servers like netware. As for now i am using these below mentioned lines to support file-name mangling over my samba. --------- #I do not want my filenames to be case sensitive, hence case sensitive = no #I want all file names to be saved as in upper case, hence default case = upper #I do not want user input file-name case to be preserved, hence preserve case = no #I do not even want the case of files which conform to 8.3 syntax to be preserved, hence short preserve case = no #...

...a tret; Since memcpy takes i8* as its argument, the struct.ta* is bitcasted to i8* in the call to llvm.memcpy. For a pass that I am working on, I would like to know the original type of this pointer. In this example, I would like to know that the second argument is a pointer to type struct.ta, and hence the size of memory allocated to that pointer is 4 bytes. I understand that the second argument to memcpy intrinsic namely i8* bitcast (%struct.ta* @t1 to i8*) is a ConstantExpression (CE). When I dump CE->getArgument(0), I get the following. @t1 = global %struct.ta zeroinitializer, align 4...

Hi Everyone, I am using OutCall 1.6 (latest) with Asterisk 1.6 and Windows Vista. I can originate calls see the program login nicely but when a call comes in it only shows the Name portion of the CLID and not the number hence it pulls up a new contact on Outlook. The new contact only show name and last name and no CLID Number again. So, this repeats every-time I call even if I manually enter a number and save the contact or save it without a number. Seems to me that Outcall is not harvesting the CLID number as it shoul...

...everyone! FOREWORD: I respect your time and resources, I hope to not bother people on this mailinglist! To my defense: This question is far easier towards humans than to mailinglist and web search-engines as the search terms in relation to each other are highly in-causal or paradoxical, and hence lead to poor results. Of course the manpage was the first place where I looked (without success). May other people find the solution to their problem in this my post and its replies! Please CC me in your answers, as I am not a regular mailinglist subscriber. Thanks! QUESTION: I am doing a...

...cannot explain without providing some context first: I want to calculate how many policy-connected coalitions between 7 parties are possible. I have positions on an one-dimensional scale for each party and I have sorted the parties on the positions (it is sorted from extreme left to extreme right, hence using a left-right scale). A policy-connected coalition consists of parties that are connected on this left-right scale, hence there cannot be a party outside the coalition that is in-between two parties in the coalition on the left-right scale. My question is: how do a make a matrix that excludes...

...materialize Java functions in vmkit. The current implementation is not satisfactory because the materializeFunction of a module provider is not supposed to do anything but read the bitcode, which is not the case in Java. In Java, materializing a function Foo can possibly trigger class loading (hence executing Java code), do static initialization of classes that may even invoke Foo. Hence after materializing a function, it's possible that the function has already been codegen'd. So that's the first part of the patch: after materializing a function, the JIT checks if the function...

...< were accepted into the LLVM repo, and I believe it's been done several times after that as well. m. >From: Ahmed Bougacha >Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 1:43 AM >To: Benoit Perrot >Cc: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu ; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] llvm (hence Clang) not compiling >withVisual Studio 2008 >On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Benoit Perrot ><benoit.noe.perrot at gmail.com> wrote: >>3. modify the code in MCModule.cpp to cope with the implementation of >>"lower_bound" in VS 2008. >> >(3) Fixed in...

Thank you. Alexei just committed the change to SVN. Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > LGTM. > Please commit. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Marco Leogrande <ma...

Hi all, I have the following setup PSTN -> ASTERISK -> IVR (using dialogic card) 1) Caller id information is presented to asterisk during the first and second ring. 2) Hence, Asterisk waits for 2 rings before pickup the call and forwarding to the appropriate FXS port. 3) The IVR application also waits for 2 rings before picking up the call to get the caller id. 4) Hence any caller calling to the IVR will have to wait for 4 rings before he is serviced. This is too lo...

root@Delta:~# tc filter add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 flowid 1:5 protocol ip Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "1:5" is unparsable root@Delta:~# tc filter add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 classid 1:5 protocol ip Unknown filter "classid", hence option "1:5" is unparsable I don''t understand why it does not work. Can anybody explain me this problem? -- Christoph Kling...

Hi, Here are some top reminders for the 3.12 release: 1) When 3.12 is released 3.8 will be EOL'd, hence users are encouraged to prepare for the same as per the calendar posted here. 2) 3.12 is a long term maintenance (LTM) release, and potentially the last in the 3.x line of Gluster! 3) From this release onward, the feature freeze date is moved ~45 days in advance, before the release. Hence, for...

Hello Community, (sorry to be more busy, hence more running questions in parallel :) ) As mentioned in another post, I am testing mail_crypt plugin. I was wondering how to really secure the process sothat even the admin cannot have any access to the other users mail content. My current config is simple: - using per-folder keys (hence the...

...ooked a new patch that should make a bit more sense. I have added the new builder under _get_experimental_scheduled_builders(), as the comment above that function suggested me it would be a good idea. :) Does it look a reasonable start? Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Marco Leogrande <marcol at plumgrid.com> wrote: > Hi Galina, > > thanks for the info! > > I think we will go for the "LLVM+clang with cmake" approach, sinc...

...el, since I use kernel 2.4.21 and I saw on - HTB Homepage that I need to patch it only if I run version 2.4.20 or earlier. Do also need the kernel patch ? Or maybe is something else wrong? RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory Deleted old root disk on eth0 Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "1:10" is unparsable Unknown filter "flowid", hence option "1:2" is unparsable RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument Thanks! Alex ______________________...

..., that isn''t memberlist. sorry) Hi Everyone..!! i''m beginner in tc with htb, i''m use to limit public, and nat ip clients, i''m to add to one of my server and get this error: > tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 Unknown qdisc "htb", hence option "default" is unparsable here is my server information: Linux Server 2.4.20-30.9 #1 Wed Feb 4 20:44:26 EST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Module Size Used by Not tainted cls_u32 6300 0 (autoclean) cls_fw 3512 0 (autoclean)...

...kes i8* as its argument, the struct.ta* is bitcasted to > i8* in the call to llvm.memcpy. For a pass that I am working on, I > would like to know the original type of this pointer. In this example, > I would like to know that the second argument is a pointer to type > struct.ta, and hence the size of memory allocated to that pointer is 4 > bytes. > You should be able to use the stripPointerCasts() method of llvm::Value * to strip off the bitcast. > I understand that the second argument to memcpy intrinsic namely i8* > bitcast (%struct.ta* @t1 to i8*) is a Constant...