Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "hellocount".
Did you mean:
hellocounter
2013 Mar 29
1
[LLVMdev] How to use the llvm::Linker？
...lePass {
static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid
Hello2() : ModulePass(ID) {}
virtual bool runOnModule(llvm::Module &M){
llvm::Linker *linkertest = new llvm::Linker(programNametest,&M);
llvm::errs() << linkertest->getModule();
++HelloCounter;
errs() << "Hello: ";
return false;
}
// We don't modify the program, so we preserve all analyses
virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.setPreservesAll();
}
};
}
char Hello2::ID = 0;
static RegisterPass<Hello2&...
2010 Aug 14
0
[LLVMdev] Questions about trip count
..."
#include "llvm/Pass.h"
#include "llvm/Function.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h"
using namespace llvm;
STATISTIC(HelloCounter, "Counts number of functions greeted");
namespace {
struct Hello: public FunctionPass {
static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid
Hello() : FunctionPass(&ID) {}
void getLoopInfo(const Function& F) const {
const LoopInfo *LI = &getAnalysis<LoopInfo...
2010 Aug 12
2
[LLVMdev] Questions about trip count
On 08/12/2010 09:41 PM, Douglas do Couto Teixeira wrote:
> Dear guys,
>
> I am having problems to obtain good information from the LoopInfo.
> I am always getting a trip count of 0, even though I am clearly passing
> a loop with a constant bound. I am using this pass below:
Hi,
I would propose to first check if the trip count is calculated
correctly. I would do this with opt
2012 Feb 15
2
[LLVMdev] Wrong AliasAnalysis::getModRefInfo result
...}
int main()
{
int a[10];
int b[10];
for(int i=0; i<10; i++)
a[i] = i;
foo(a,b);
return 0;
}
Obviously, for "foo", it only reads from array "a" and only writes to array
"b".
The LLVM pass:
virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F) {
++HelloCounter;
errs() << "Hello: ";
errs().write_escaped(F.getName()) << '\n';
AliasAnalysis &AA = getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>();
for (inst_iterator I = inst_begin(F), E = inst_end(F); I != E; ++I) {
Instruction *Inst = &*I;
if...
2019 Apr 18
3
Opt plugin linkage
...other follow-up, seems like ExecutionEngine is still not usable without editing CMakeLists, on my setup I had to edit CMakeLists.txt as well to get the example working.
Below is the modifications I made:
Modified Hello.cpp for testing:
```
bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override {
++HelloCounter;
std::string errStr;
EngineBuilder eb;
eb.setErrorStr(&errStr);
eb.setEngineKind(EngineKind::Kind::JIT);
ExecutionEngine* ee=eb.create();
errs()<<"ExecutionEngine:"<<ee<<" Error:"<<errStr<<"\n";...
2019 Apr 16
2
Opt plugin linkage
Hey:
I spent sometime debugging this, it seems like editing ``llvm/tools/opt.cpp`` and move ``cl::ParseCommandLineOptions(argc, argv,
"llvm .bc -> .bc modular optimizer and analysis printer\n");`` to the beginning of main() solved it for me. I'm not sure if this is a bug on LLVM side
Zhang
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Viktor Was BSc via
2012 Feb 16
0
[LLVMdev] Wrong AliasAnalysis::getModRefInfo result
...t;10; i++)
> a[i] = i;
>
> foo(a,b);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> Obviously, for "foo", it only reads from array "a" and only writes to
> array "b".
>
> The LLVM pass:
> virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F) {
> ++HelloCounter;
> errs() << "Hello: ";
> errs().write_escaped(F.getName()) << '\n';
>
> AliasAnalysis &AA = getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>();
> for (inst_iterator I = inst_begin(F), E = inst_end(F); I != E; ++I) {
> Instructio...
2012 Feb 21
0
[LLVMdev] Strange behaviour with x86-64 windows, bad call instruction address
...}
int main()
{
int a[10];
int b[10];
for(int i=0; i<10; i++)
a[i] = i;
foo(a,b);
return 0;
}
Obviously, for "foo", it only reads from array "a" and only writes to array
"b".
The LLVM pass:
virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F) {
++HelloCounter;
errs() << "Hello: ";
errs().write_escaped(F.getName()) << '\n';
AliasAnalysis &AA = getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>();
for (inst_iterator I = inst_begin(F), E = inst_end(F); I != E; ++I) {
Instruction *Inst = &*I;
if...