Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "hello_world_1_nest_func_aa".
2010 Nov 24
3
[LLVMdev] Question regarding the alias analysis chaining behaviour
Hi,
I am using LLVM 2.4 on a Linux RHEL5 machine. I was trying to figure out
how the chaining of the alias analysis passes works in LLVM. Here are the
command I used to test the chaining part.
1. ./opt hello_world_1_nest_func.bc -o hello_world_1_nest_func_AA.bc
-no-aa -anders-aa -licm
Result: Anderson's AA and No Alias Analysis both are called.
2. ./opt hello_world_1_nest_func.bc -o hello_world_1_nest_func_AA.bc
-basicaa -anders-aa -licm
Result: Anderson's AA and Basic AA both are called.
3. ./opt hello_world_1_nest_func.bc -o hello_wor...
2010 Nov 24
0
[LLVMdev] Question regarding the alias analysis chaining behaviour
dirac wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using LLVM 2.4 on a Linux RHEL5 machine. I was trying to figure
> out how the chaining of the alias analysis passes works in LLVM. Here
> are the command I used to test the chaining part.
> 1. ./opt hello_world_1_nest_func.bc -o hello_world_1_nest_func_AA.bc
> -no-aa -anders-aa -licm
> Result: Anderson's AA and No Alias Analysis both are called.
> 2. ./opt hello_world_1_nest_func.bc -o hello_world_1_nest_func_AA.bc
> -basicaa -anders-aa -licm
> Result: Anderson's AA and Basic AA both are called.
> 3. ./opt hello...
2010 Nov 25
0
[LLVMdev] Question regarding the alias analysis chaining behaviour
...dirac wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am using LLVM 2.4 on a Linux RHEL5 machine. I was trying to figure
>> out how the chaining of the alias analysis passes works in LLVM. Here
>> are the command I used to test the chaining part.
>> 1. ./opt hello_world_1_nest_func.bc -o hello_world_1_nest_func_AA.bc
>> -no-aa -anders-aa -licm
>> Result: Anderson's AA and No Alias Analysis both are called.
>> 2. ./opt hello_world_1_nest_func.bc -o hello_world_1_nest_func_AA.bc
>> -basicaa -anders-aa -licm
>> Result: Anderson's AA and Basic AA both are called....