search for: heisit

...39;t rule it out, it seems to me that it's less likely to be a hardware problem if I've simply provided MORE memory to a process (or set of processes) to avoid the issue... This is my current 'top' output.? It's not that the system is actually running low on memory, so I had no heisitation increasing the vsz limit. last pid: 59072;? load averages:? 0.30,? 0.29,? 0.32?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? up 7+03:02:34? 14:27:59 1265 processes:1 running, 1264 sleeping CPU:? 2.6% user,? 0.0% nice,? 1.4% system,? 0.2% interrupt, 95.9% idle Mem: 3326M Active, 221...

On 24 Sep 2015, at 16:26, Rick Romero <rick at havokmon.com> wrote: > > Update. Only a single reboot has occurred since changing > defalt_vsz_limit from 384M to 512M. It would seem that something the > users are doing is causing that virtual memory size to be exceeded > (possibly a mailbox search?), and when that occurs Dovecot/FreeBSD is not > handling the event as