search for: heigt

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "heigt".

Did you mean: height
2004 Sep 10
2
2/0, 2/2 3/0, 3/2, 5.1, wxyz
...sos/nov01/images/surroundfig1dolbyblobs.l.gif there are different channel profiles for 5.1: L R C LFE Ls Rs (DVD) L R Ls Rs C LFE L C R Ls Rs LFE (Film) then we have ambisonics where we have 1st, 2nd and 3rd order (4, 9 and 16 channels), but then you can also have 2 dimensional ambisonics without heigt signal, which gives another 3 options, plus different UHJ encoded variants, etc. how can we squeeze this in 4 bits?
2004 Sep 10
0
2/0, 2/2 3/0, 3/2, 5.1, wxyz
...quot;input 3" or "input 5" or whatever set of inputs your sending it to, depending on how that set of inputs is configured. > then we have ambisonics where we have 1st, 2nd and 3rd order (4, 9 and > 16 channels), but then you can also have 2 dimensional ambisonics > without heigt signal, which gives another 3 options, plus different UHJ > encoded variants, etc. Well, we already have the problem of being able to encode only a very limited number of independent tracks in this field, too. Currently the limit is 8, which does me no good when I want to FLAC-encode a multi-tr...
2011 Sep 13
2
help with hclust and cutree
Hello, I would like to cut a hclust tree into several groups at a specific similarity. I assume this can be achieved by specifying the "h" argument with the specified similarity, e.g.: clust<-hclust(dist,"average") cut<-cutree(clust,h=0.65) Now, I would like to draw rectangles around the branches of the dendrogram highlighting the corresponding clusters, as is done by
2004 Sep 10
3
2/0, 2/2 3/0, 3/2, 5.1, wxyz
i didn't find anything about tagging flac files as surround files. i think there should some possibility to tell the player how to play a multi-channel file (how to map the different channels to the speakers or if there some decode is needed, like for ambisonic files). any idea how to implement it?
2004 Sep 10
1
2/0, 2/2 3/0, 3/2, 5.1, wxyz
...d more this is only for 5.1. i still think we need a more flexible approach than only defining 16 different channel mappings. >>then we have ambisonics where we have 1st, 2nd and 3rd order (4, 9 and >>16 channels), but then you can also have 2 dimensional ambisonics >>without heigt signal, which gives another 3 options, plus different UHJ >>encoded variants, etc. > > > Well, we already have the problem of being able to encode only a very > limited number of independent tracks in this field, too. Currently > the limit is 8, which does me no good when I w...