search for: heeding

Hi, After many hours of searching (!) and lots of testing procmail scripts, I found the explanation I was looking for -- something you explained at http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2008-July/032551.html That explains it. Thing is, though, every time I've seen shared mailboxes -- really shared by multiple staff or not -- the preference is in fact for the shared behaviours to also

In my function I am trying to return multiple computed items (separated by commas). The function does what I need, but I get a warning message that multi-argument returns are deprecated. Is this a warning I should heed, or is there a more elegant and warning free way of achieving the same end? Thanks --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I was reading: https://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html And am heeding the warnings that come with new (derived) types. I'm trying to use LLVM to model chemicals. More specifically, there are several reactive groups that exist: salts, bases, acids, etc. that adequately represent their respective values. I, for obvious reasons, want to manifest those types in LL...

hi: Just starting out with *, and I'm planning to heed the advice to start simple and small, but the goal i'm aiming for eventually is: *-based pbx for 10-20 seat small business, based in the UK. Users will have PoE SIP hardphones. So far so good, but two questions, both UK-specific, relating to connection to the outside world (PSTN or VoIP): - are there any UK-based VoIP providers

...telling me that this is possible. I just wanted to know if there are any success stories out there and whether or not i need any additional hardware, other than a PC. I know that one could use ztdummy as a timing source. Is this the best way, or is there some wise words out there one should be heeding. TIA Cheers Terry

Guys currently I am horrified by the ease at which I can find bugs in the pending paravirtualization patches. I have barely even looked at arch/i386 in the -mm tree and it feels like I am tripping over significant bugs left and right. Because no one has heeded my advice and put in a proper platform layer on arch/i386 and we are instead doing a half baked job with paravirt_ops it is still

Guys currently I am horrified by the ease at which I can find bugs in the pending paravirtualization patches. I have barely even looked at arch/i386 in the -mm tree and it feels like I am tripping over significant bugs left and right. Because no one has heeded my advice and put in a proper platform layer on arch/i386 and we are instead doing a half baked job with paravirt_ops it is still

Hi Joshua No back-off, but I am caching the last 5000 results and and first hitting the cache to see if a recent command already provided the information I'm seeking for a particular request. I'll see if I can do some simulation and see if I'm effectively DDOSing the local HTTP interface. I'll have to see if I maybe have a resource leak in my code that makes the HTTP request,

Hello everyone, Just kind of a generalized question, and looking more for caveats than anything else. We're getting ready to implement the latest and greatest release of Samba on one of our Sun servers. Unfortunately, we haven't determined which one yet, but we only have two, so it's not a big deal. Anyways, I've set up Samba successfully on Linux on multiple occasions, the

On 5/14/2018 4:18 PM, Jason Ott via llvm-dev wrote: > I was reading: https://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html > > And am heeding the warnings that come with new (derived) types. > > I'm trying to use LLVM to model chemicals.  More specifically, there > are several reactive groups that exist: salts, bases, acids, etc. that > adequately represent their respective values.  I, for obvious reasons, > want to...

CentOS has a clear mission. It's the first paragraph on the centos.org home page: CentOS is an Enterprise-class Linux Distribution derived from sources freely provided to the public by a prominent North American Enterprise Linux vendor. CentOS conforms fully with the upstream vendors redistribution policy and aims to be 100% binary compatible. (CentOS mainly changes packages

Subject: nls, step factor 0.000488281 reduced below 'minFactor' of 0.000976563 Hi there, I'm trying to conduct nls regression using roughly the below code: nls1 <- nls(y ~ a*(1-exp(-b*x^c)), start=list(a=a1,b=b1,c=c1)) I checked my start values by plotting the relationship etc. but I kept getting an error message saying maximum iterations exceeded. I have tried changing these

Am 25.04.2024 um 19:59 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > I suspect that I forgot to set the idmap config on the DC(s) > accordingly? > Do not set idmap config lines on a Samba DC, they do not work, you must > use the 3000000 numbers or use rfc2307 attributes (uidNumber, > gidNumber, etc) > > Have you read this: > >

Colin Bleay wrote: > last week i sent an e-mail about dealing with errors thrown up from a > glm.nb model carried out on multiple random datasets. > > every so often a dataset is created which results in the following error > after a call to glm.nb: > > "Error: NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 1) > In addition: Warning message: > Step size truncated due

...ng up there. I just want to make sure this is accurate. On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 5/14/2018 4:18 PM, Jason Ott via llvm-dev wrote: > >> I was reading: https://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html >> >> And am heeding the warnings that come with new (derived) types. >> >> I'm trying to use LLVM to model chemicals. More specifically, there are >> several reactive groups that exist: salts, bases, acids, etc. that >> adequately represent their respective values. I, for obvious reasons,...

Dear Bredan -- I'm seeing them in the debug logs, but they're not making their way into the stream. OTOH, they are making their way to the directories (ie, shoutcast): http://yp.shoutcast.com/directory/?s=lamrim&st=gs&l=25 Any thoughts? Thanks for the great work! Roy At 03:38 PM 7/12/01 -0400, you wrote: >On Monday, 09 July 2001 at 12:26, Darrell Berry wrote:

Though quiet at the moment, my desktop sometimes sometimes makes a noise that I attribute to either a disk or a fan on its last legs. I'm looking for suggestions for distinguishing. For the disk, I expect I should use either hdparm of fsck. Even after reading the man page, I'm not sure how I would use hdparm. If I use fsck, what should I take as evidence of a bad drive? A good drive? Is

Hi, I am a graduate student applying published R scripts to compare the classification accuracy of 2 predictive models, one built using discriminant function analysis and one using random forests (webpage link for these scripts is provided below). The purpose of these models is to predict the biotic integrity of streams. Specifically, I am trying to compare the classification accuracy (i.e.,

...this is accurate. > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org> > wrote: > >> On 5/14/2018 4:18 PM, Jason Ott via llvm-dev wrote: >> >>> I was reading: https://llvm.org/docs/ExtendingLLVM.html >>> >>> And am heeding the warnings that come with new (derived) types. >>> >>> I'm trying to use LLVM to model chemicals. More specifically, there are >>> several reactive groups that exist: salts, bases, acids, etc. that >>> adequately represent their respective values. I, for...

...e access, the x11 call succeeds, and it opens a window on the server named in the 'display' argument. Nothing happens on DISPLAY, which is appropriate. My conjecture: R seems to first connect to the server given by the DISPLAY environment variable, performing no visible operations, before heeding the 'display' argument. (D) It is possible to swich between X11 servers (a.k.a. displays) on the fly by using graphics.off() followed by x11(my.new.display). When Googling, I found the error string "Couldn't find per display information" sometimes associated with the Xt libr...