search for: heckling

I''ve tried running Heckle with rspec on some of my classes, but keep getting (what I believe to be) an infinite recursion. Is there some way to supply extra options to heckle via. rspec? Scott

Hi, I''m trying out RSpec with the heckle option (for mutation testing). Problem is that heckle goes into an infinite loop when running it on an example. I want to send a "--verbose" to heckle but can''t find a way to do that through the spec binary. Since this is not an uncommon situation when using heckle I would like this to be supported in some way by RSpec.

Now that I''m developing a big suite of specs, I really want to run Heckle and see how well I''ve done. Using r1359, when I run: spec spec/models/metadata_report_spec.rb --heckle MetadataReport the result is just to run the specs once and then exit, as though I hadn''t mentioned Heckle. I started looking though rspec to figure out why, but it''s late, so I should

How do I run Heckle with RSpec? I''ve tried rake spec --heckle but get no output. I''ve tried just -heckle too, as mentioned in the docs, but that isn''t accepted as a valid option and the help out is displayed. I have both the heckle and rspec-rails gems in my Gemfile, and running Rails 3, and have the latest beta version (at the time 17) installed. Thanks.

...or Heckle - Seattle''rb''s code mutation tool. There are also several bug fixes to the RSpec core and the RSpec on Rails plugin. Changes: http://rspec.rubyforge.org/changes.html Download: http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=797 or gem install rspec Happy spec''ing, and now heckling! The RSpec Development Team

Hi I can''t get heckle working. In fact, I''ve built an example so simple that it either shows a bug, or I am being really, REALLY stupid. Heckle does not appear to support RSpec directly, so I''m trying to use spec --heckle (RSpec trunk as of 10 mins ago, Heckle 1.4.1). I''ve constructed this pair of sample files: 18> ~/Desktop/heckle_test % cat

...ailures. Was going to post to the list, as the first version was about 4 lines long, but I''ve embellished it slightly (I got carried away), so decided link to it instead, where you can view it in all its syntax- highlighted glory: <http://aviewfromafar.net/2007/11/1/rake-task-for-heckling-your-specs> Let me know if anyone finds it useful Ashley -- blog @ http://aviewfromafar.net/ linked-in @ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran currently @ home

I''m working on tool to automatically run code metrics in the same way as autotest. It''s runs rcov, flog, and saikuro right now, and works with rspec and rails. It''s hosted at rubyforge: http://rubyforge.org/projects/autometric/ I''ve got a post on how to configure it with growl: http://benburkert.com/2007/11/9/introducing-autometric I''m hoping

Scott, I have changed the configuration as said it and will test it. I?m curious. Can you briefly explain what insecure=invite,port does? ;insecure=port ; Allow matching of peer by IP address without ; matching port number ;insecure=invite ; Do not require authentication of incoming INVITEs ;insecure=port,invite ; (both) Do I understand correctly that

Okay, Scott, I think we are on the wrong path. Maybe I'm wrong though. I will summarize again briefly the problems together: The peer ip address could be another than the ip address of incoming invites After an re-register the REGISTER is send to the new SIP server, answered with OK. But the peer ip address is still the old one (sip show peers). If now is a INVITE, the request is answered

You have two options for dealing with an IP change during the registration period: 1) set the registration time to shorter period of time to minimize the downtime 2) detect that the IP address has changed via whatever method available, and then issue a "sip reload" CLI command to asterisk, which will cause it to resend registrations immediately. On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Daniel

I do not want set allowguest=yes. The problem is, there is no official list with ip addresses of Telekom Germany. But I think all ip addresses comes from the ip range 217.0.0.0/13. I have now the following addition to sip.conf. I think it is the only safe option. Or what would you say? [telekom](!) context=from-trunk type=peer defaultuser= authuser= remotesecret= fromdomain=tel.t-online.de

Ok, I have tested dnsmgr. This is not a solution, the situation has not changed. With dnsmgr I can not place outbound calls. I do not know why and what dnsmgr really do. My current solution is as follows: Say allowguest=yes, configure the default context that there can not be placed outbound calls. Use iptables to DROP all at your SIP port and allow only your local phones and the sip trunk ip

Hey list, Does anything exist that can show me which lines are explicitly tested? RCov is great, but it doesn''t really give a sense of _actual_ coverage, indeed, there is no guarantee that functions executed were in fact called as the result of a line being tested. I know nothing of the rspec internals, but would a simple list of executed lines be a relatively simple feature to add?

I''ve finally managed to find some time to do some serious work on Mocha. There are some code snippets on my blog (http://blog.floehopper.org/articles/2007/04/12/preview-of-latest-mocha-changes) showing the new functionality available in trunk (revision 128). I don''t don''t know how many people out there are using trunk, but it would be great to get some feedback on these

Hello Sebastian, I had already seen this list of the hosts, but it is not active. All servers with which my Asterisk has been communicated are not listed. A port scan, to eventually update the list, found hundreds of servers provided in the address range 217.0.0.0/13 with open port 5060, some were even not found. I think there must be another solution. If I change insecure to

That sounds like asterisk was working 100% correctly. If you receive an INVITE from an unknown IP address, then it should fail. Unless you want to allow anonymous, which is genearlly a very bad idea. If you are registering to IP X, but the provider may be transmitting invites from any number of other IP addresses, then you need a list of IP addresses, and have a trunk configuration set up for

On Oct 31, 2007 11:36 AM, Scott Taylor <mailing_lists at railsnewbie.com> wrote: > When can we expect the next release of rspec? Definitely by the end of November. Likely by mid-November. Hopefully in a matter of days. The next release will be 1.1.0. We''re going to a release model in which 1.odd.x will be considered experimental. This means that while we will document

Actually, the IP address is still used to identify the incoming invite. With the insecure=port option set, Asterisk will presume the invite to still match the trunk account even if the NAT router has mangled (changed) the port number. My suspicion is that when the new register goes out, it's creating a new state in the firewall, resulting in a new port number, which is why you would have to

If I correctly understand what the problem is, what I did was write a script that runs out of CRON every 15 minutes. It checks the outside IP address by querying http://checkip.dyndns.org and compares it to the IP address stored in the parameter ?externip? in the [general] section of sip.conf. If the two values are the same, the script exits quietly. If they are different, the script updates