search for: heckin

In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug. Jarkko Sakkinen (15): MIPS: replace **** with a hug Documentation: replace **** with a hug drm/nouveau: replace **** with a hug m68k: replace **** with a hug parisc: replace **** with a hug cpufreq: replace **** with a hug ide: replace **** with a hug media: replace **** with a hug mtd: replace **** with a hug

...gt; > In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug. Heh. I support the replacement of the stronger language, but I find "hug", "hugged", and "hugging" to be very weird replacements. Can we bikeshed this to "heck", "hecked", and "hecking" (or "heckin" to follow true Doggo meme style). "This API is hugged" doesn't make any sense to me. "This API is hecked" is better, or at least funnier (to me). "Hug this interface" similarly makes no sense, but "Heck this interface" seems...

...o comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug. > > Heh. I support the replacement of the stronger language, but I find > "hug", "hugged", and "hugging" to be very weird replacements. Can we > bikeshed this to "heck", "hecked", and "hecking" (or "heckin" to > follow true Doggo meme style). > > "This API is hugged" doesn't make any sense to me. "This API is > hecked" is better, or at least funnier (to me). "Hug this interface" > similarly makes no sense, but "Heck th...

...comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug. > > Heh. I support the replacement of the stronger language, but I find > "hug", "hugged", and "hugging" to be very weird replacements. Can we > bikeshed this to "heck", "hecked", and "hecking" (or "heckin" to > follow true Doggo meme style). > > "This API is hugged" doesn't make any sense to me. "This API is > hecked" is better, or at least funnier (to me). "Hug this interface" > similarly makes no sense, but "Heck t...