search for: heavier

...h auth processes through a unix type socket (named 'default') : can I create a second auth block in dovecot.conf (for instance 'aut extra {...}') in addition to the existing 'auth default {...}' one ? would it create an second unix socket and thus allowing a heavier login processes load ? what would be the difference between that and, say, changing the 'count' parameter to '2' in the 'auth default' section ? thanks. -- Thomas Hummel | Institut Pasteur <hummel at pasteur.fr> | P?le informatique - syst?mes et r...

...ling a file with libfuzzer: one just needs to add “-fsanitize=fuzzer” to the command line, and the driver would specify coverage flags and link with libfuzzer automatically. I wanted to ask whether it would make more sense to rename the flag to “-ffuzzer”, as it’s not a sanitizer, and it has a much heavier effect. Thanks, George

The cat is out of the bag, so here''s the full disclosure edition of the current security vulnerability. With Rails 1.1.0 through 1.1.5 (minus the short-lived 1.1.3), you can trigger the evaluation of Ruby code through the URL because of a bug in the routing code of Rails. This means that you can essentially take down a Rails process by starting something like /script/profiler, as the code

...the first child until > it's needed (that is in the preincrement operator). The only open > question would be: how do we mark the children iterator invalid > before its first use. This does sound like a useful use-case, but I am uncomfortable with making DepthFirstIterator any heavier (by adding "CurrentTopNode" to it), is there another way to solve this problem? > The second one (poi) have to be applied anyway, as it fixes a > compile bug rendering po_ext_iterator currently unusable. Thanks, applied! http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-...

Hi @llvm, below is a copy of a message I sent to clang a hour before. I guess it's more appropriate here. --snip-- While trying to eleminate as much std::tr1::function as possible I stumbled over a design flaw in llvm::df_iterator. Consider the following code: void for_all_stmts(Stmt* S, const std::tr1::function<void(Stmt*)>& fn) { if (S) { fn(S); for

...ierarchy. For reference, I've attached two WIP patches (which would be squashed before commit) and the WIP upgrade script I'm using. - transition-code.patch: Change the `DIDescriptor` hierarchy to lightweight wrappers around the subclasses of `DebugNode` (instead of rather heavier wrappers around `MDTuple`), and update `DIBuilder` to generate the right things. - transition-testcases.patch: Upgrade of testcases, entirely generated from the upgrade script (so far). - upgrade-specialized-nodes.sh: Script to upgrade LLVM assembly. (Feel free to have a look,...

...ion if available (and non-buggy). > >  3. Import a more heavy weight library such as PCRE, and use it universally. Personally, I'm a big fan of the Boost libraries. They've got a regex library, and a full-blown parser library (which I am using in my front-end). It's definitely heavier than POSIX, but it's portable, well-tested, and loaded with features. >  - Daniel > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >

...entation of the data spatialy corresponding to a real support, as it is the case with the function image(marray) from Bioconductor packages, which fills the graphical matrix by row from upper-left, but just handles marrayRaw or marrayNorm objects. Of course, I could reorder the matrix, but it's heavier than with an already available function if it exists... Thanks a lot for help BUHARD Olivier

...but a run thru the help files didn't turn up an answer. I noticed while formatting some figures for publication that text enclosed in expression() and used for a title displays differently than a string, regardless of the par options. On both postscript() and x11() devices, the regular text is heavier than the expression text. Here's an example. The "real thing" used expression() to produce superscripts, but I boiled this down to the simplest possible case. par(mfrow=c(2,1)) plot(1:10, 1:10, main="Figure A") plot(1:10, 1:10, main=expression("Figure B")) Is th...

Hi, please advise, I attempted to use this boot loader on my new(ish) laptop to enable a boot from a USB device containing a Linux distro, however this failed and I have decided to re-partition my hard disk and install a heavier distro. The boot sequence on the laptop now runs syslinux and pxe ( which fails with error 64), causing a few seconds delay in the boot proceedure. How can I remove these calls from the boot process? Befor I get the standard RTFM, I have looked, but have failed to see anything regarding removing...

...to the dealer I bought them from they organized for me to rma them directly. 2 brand new grandstreams now sitting on my desk. Has anyone else noticed that they have changed not only the plastic composition of the handsets but also the design of the handpiece itself (slightly thinner and slightly heavier) I could be wrong but to me it sounds like the voice quality has improved between the older model and the newer one so slightly. And for $50 or there abouts you cant complain. Just my 0.02c worth. Cheers, Dean

Good Day, I've been doing a little work that I wanted to share. We've had a number of Asterisk systems that have been under heavier than normal attack. We use fail2ban but we either have to let each system be exposed or keep all the data synchronized which is a bit of a chore. I wrote a little server that assists in keeping data synchronized across sites. If you're interested in using it to assist in managing your ow...

.../lib. > Related to the first question: do the above flags also make clang use libc++ by default, or is this configurable via a different set of flags? No. I believe this is an old flag when that wasn't enable by default (and now it's used to disable it if you have the dirs). But maybe heavier users of libc++ can help you there. You still have to use LDFLAGS="--stdlib=libc++ -lc++abi -lunwind" and, if you're not installing it anywhere (but using the build directory), add LD_LIBRARY_PATH=build/lib to your environment. If you run into inconsistencies because libgcc_s / libg...

So, on my old Netbook, now happily running C6.9, I'm looking for opinions for a lightweight window manager. Gnome surely ain't it.... Years back, I used to like IceWM, but not sure it's been kept up. So, opinions? mark

...er second at that moment. In short, I can't see any reason how the lookup could have taken so long, so my guess is there are some issues with the dns-helper (locking, stepping on each others feet, not being spawned fast enough) causing this. Some general remarks, dovecot as proxy feels "heavier" than perdition. In the CPU area that's probably a more subjective impression, because all the little helper processes make it clear what's going on where. Though the "config" process being rather active is something that perdition definitely doesn't do, it reads the c...

...fuzzer: > one just needs to add “-fsanitize=fuzzer” to the command line, and the driver would specify > coverage flags and link with libfuzzer automatically. > I wanted to ask whether it would make more sense to rename the flag to “-ffuzzer”, > as it’s not a sanitizer, and it has a much heavier effect. > > Thanks, > George > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed.....

> Sounds like threading isn't beneficial much beyond the second CPU... > Maybe blindly creating one thread per core isn't the best plan... parallel.h is pretty simplistic at the moment. Currently it creates one per SMT. One per core and being lazy about it would probably be a good thing, but threading is already beneficial and improving parallel.h an welcome improvement. Cheers,

Regarding resource constraint problems, I didn't build llvm on much heavier machine previously, so it is difficult for me to tell whether my build is taking longer than expected trivially, fresh build (+ clang, lldb) takes time. But rebuild are actually fast. I will use -compress-debug-sections with the full build and rebuilds and see how fast it is :) Making an assumption...

...terested in using the facility I added for setting > default ThinLTO backend parallelism so that one per physical core is > created, llvm::heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() (see D25585 and > r284390). The name is meant to indicate that this is the concurrency that > should be used for heavier weight tasks (that may use a lot of memory e.g.). > Sorry for my ignorance, but what's the point of running the same number of threads as the number of physical cores instead of HT virtual cores? If we can get better throughput by not running more than one thread per a physical core, it fee...

...ration choices and fine tuning but they also were limited vastly in other ways. You can't run a fleet of 1000 Model TT trucks made in 1923 as well as you could 1000 1933 trucks. You ended up losing some of the knowledge of hand-crafting your own gears but you got the ability to go faster, carry heavier loads and better gas mileage without working as hard at getting a mile out of a quart. The transmissions of the 1933 were considered 'automatic' compared to some 1912 vehicles.. even if you had a clutch because you no longer had to get out and turn something to make it go in reverse. The &...