search for: heartedness

how to set a maximum length for text area in rails -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Cameron McInally <cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu> wrote: > Hey Jeffrey, > > Thanks for the suggestion. A few comments... > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at googlers.com> > wrote: > ... >> >> If you can find a way to implement -fsanitize=undefined to use the FP >> trap instead of a branch

Hey Jeffrey, Thanks for the suggestion. A few comments... On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at googlers.com>wrote: ... > > If you can find a way to implement -fsanitize=undefined to use the FP > trap instead of a branch when checking floating division by 0, I > suspect such a patch would stand a good chance of being accepted. > (Although I'm not

...ng for an *option* to turn off a set of optimizations; not turn off optimizations in general. I would like to make it easy for a compiler implementor to choose the desired behaviour. I whole-heartedly believe that both behaviours (undefined and trap) have merit. To digress in the interest of light-heartedness, this reminds me of the old joke "my program's performance improved 20x!, but the results aren't correct". :) > >> You might need to > >> do this in the processor-specific backend to avoid other > >> undefined-behavior-based optimizations—that is, reco...