search for: heartburn

this one is killing me. all i want to do is validate the format of user-entered software versions. so in the model i have: validates_format_of :version, :message=>"Not valid version number." :with=>/[0-9]\.[0-9]{2}\.[0-9]{2}\.[0-9]{2}\.[0-9]{2}/ the form field is simply the scaffold form code: <p><label

Greetings all. I''m using the Microsoft "NorthWind Traders" database "orders" table as test data for the Rico LiveGrid JavaScript. The problem I''m noticing is that some of the records in the "ShipName" field contain ampersands -- which for some reason are not being escaped by Rails. Rails does in fact automatically escape all of the other

...;seclabel model='dac' relabel='no'/> > </source> I've just tried it and the SELinux label is not changed anymore, but the ownership is still changed to qemu:qemu. > I'm also not sure why you think to resort to chattr +i, but if using > that causes libvirt heartburn, maybe we have a bug to fix to be more > tolerant of failed label attempts due to chattr. I resorted to `chattr +i` because I got tired of libvirtd messing with my files even if it wasn't required.  The official versions of libvirtd from Fedora 18 or 19 used to complain about not being able...

I'm trying to rsync a large data set (approx 140K files, 4TB) between machines directly connected on gigabit ethernet. Normally it runs around 20MB/sec, which is acceptable. However, it seems like there is one particular file that is giving rsync heartburn... whenever it encounters this file, the speed drops down to 150KB/sec speed within a few seconds. I don't know what's so special about this file. I've tried scp'ing it directly between boxes - 20MB/sec. I tried rsync in ssh and daemon modes, same deal - 150KB/sec. rsync 2.6.9 o...

Hello LLVM, I'm trying to make symbolizing work in llvm-objdump. This comment in ObjectFile.h gives me some heartburn: https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/include/llvm/Object/ObjectFile.h#L196 // The main goal of // this is to allow SymbolRef::SymbolPimpl to point directly to the symbol // entry in the memory mapped object file. SymbolPimpl cannot contain any // virtual functions because then it coul...

I need an atomic pointer exchange, so I took a look at Support/Atomic.h, and the only supported types are 32-bit values. I can't figure out an obvious reason for this other than perhaps nobody ever had need of this yet, but given that this is kind of a low level thing, I thought I should ask first. Is there any reason I should not add 64-bit versions of the atomic functions? Additionally,

Hi, I'm installing the operating system for my virtual machines from CD images and I would like for libvirtd to stop relabeling the corresponding files.  Since the installation media is no big secret, I have labeled the files with system_u:object_r:public_content_t:s0, but libvirtd keeps changing them to system_u:object_r:svirt_image_t:s0.  It also changes the ownership to qemu:qemu.  This

...t;>> </source> >> >> I've just tried it and the SELinux label is not changed anymore, but >> the ownership is still changed to qemu:qemu. >> >>> I'm also not sure why you think to resort to chattr +i, but if using >>> that causes libvirt heartburn, maybe we have a bug to fix to be more >>> tolerant of failed label attempts due to chattr. >> >> I resorted to `chattr +i` because I got tired of libvirtd messing with >> my files even if it wasn't required.  The official versions of libvirtd >> from Fedora 18...

Greetings - I''ve just started testing Puppet and have a couple of questions: 1. Is there a way to dynamically change a configuraion file that is sent to nodes? For example, I want to modify /etc/hosts to have the hostname and ip address set dynamically - the hosts file shoule look like: 12.34.56.78 node1.example.com 22.35.66.99 server1.example.com But I don''t want to

I just put a call into AT&T Office 365 asking them to explain the spoof warning thing... To answer your question.... At the moment, no I can't. I like HPE stuff, we bought a DL380 gen9 say five months ago and totally happy with it. In fairness, its running Server 2012 r2 too but I didn't run into the hardware gotchas I did on the other stuff. It just seems HPE skimped on their lower

...rtio/virtnet_virtio.c is weird with virt repeated three times in the path. These things only get murkier with time, at the point of reorg I would expect very logical placement, since without clear guiding rule finding where something is becomes harder but more importantly we'll now get endless heartburn about where does each new function go. The reorg is unfortunately not free - for example git log --follow will no longer easily match virtio because --follow works with exactly one path. It's now also extra work to keep headers self-consistent. So it better be a big improvement to be worth i...

...> Any good idea. > > > > > These things only get murkier with time, at the point of reorg > > I would expect very logical placement, since > > without clear guiding rule finding where something is becomes harder but > > more importantly we'll now get endless heartburn about where does each new > > function go. > > > > > > The reorg is unfortunately not free - for example git log --follow will > > no longer easily match virtio because --follow works with exactly one > > path. > > One day we will face this problem. > &g...

Hello I have been using LAMP for the last 6 years and i am now finally making the choice to move over to RoR. This MVC stuff is all very new to me. As i have no trouble understanding ruby code... or any code for that matter.. my challange comes in getting my head around the MVC stuff. Is there any demos articles that you guys have seen that takes a site or a business breif and explains where

...> > > > > > These things only get murkier with time, at the point of reorg > > > I would expect very logical placement, since > > > without clear guiding rule finding where something is becomes harder but > > > more importantly we'll now get endless heartburn about where does each new > > > function go. > > > > > > > > > The reorg is unfortunately not free - for example git log --follow will > > > no longer easily match virtio because --follow works with exactly one > > > path. > > > > On...

Is anyone going to develop acute heartburn if I move these two functions as TargetLowering methods? It seems that they're used frequently enough across multiple backends and provide common functionality. I could be convinced that TargetLowering is the wrong place to put these functions as methods and that they're better off in a se...

...and that''s a whole lot of coding and testing. I can offer some help in testing as me not being a C/C++ programmer. 2. SAM-FS Remote does not work on NAT Addressing scheme. 3. Options to Installl SAM-FS HA in PrimeCluster (FUJITSU) environment. The sun cluster DID deives has caused heartburns many a times in spite of setting the raw devices for SAM-FS/QFS as ''localonly''. 4. SAM-FS/QFS does not work in Zones/Containers. How to do this? Please let me know how I can contribute to this project. Thanks, Mohan -- This messages posted from opensolaris.org

...But this marking is being done AFTER the AFHTB has done all its work, and I want to mark the DSCP values BEFORE applying the AFHTB QoS. Any suggestions/ideas/resources are truly appreciated! Scratching my head, -Tony _________________________________________________________________ Persistent heartburn? Check out Digestive Health & Wellness for information and advice. http://gerd.msn.com/default.asp _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

...label='no'/> >> </source> > > I've just tried it and the SELinux label is not changed anymore, but the > ownership is still changed to qemu:qemu. > >> I'm also not sure why you think to resort to chattr +i, but if using >> that causes libvirt heartburn, maybe we have a bug to fix to be more >> tolerant of failed label attempts due to chattr. > > I resorted to `chattr +i` because I got tired of libvirtd messing with > my files even if it wasn't required. The official versions of libvirtd > from Fedora 18 or 19 used to compl...

...hing libvirt how to restore labels to their original state, instead of the current problem of "restoring" labels to a single default setting (even where that does not match the original setting). I'm also not sure why you think to resort to chattr +i, but if using that causes libvirt heartburn, maybe we have a bug to fix to be more tolerant of failed label attempts due to chattr. -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

...> > > These things only get murkier with time, at the point of reorg > > > > I would expect very logical placement, since > > > > without clear guiding rule finding where something is becomes harder but > > > > more importantly we'll now get endless heartburn about where does each new > > > > function go. > > > > > > > > > > > > The reorg is unfortunately not free - for example git log --follow will > > > > no longer easily match virtio because --follow works with exactly one > > > &gt...