search for: healthi

Hi, I'm having difficulty with getting a table to show with multiple rows and columns. Below is the commands that I've typed in and errors that I am getting. Thank you. Laura Table trying to enter: Diet: Binger-yes: Binger-No: Total: None 24 134 158 Healthy 9 52 61 Unhealthy 23 72 95 Dangerous 12 15 27 >

Hi- I'm wondering if anyone can help me with my code. I'm coming up dry when I try to get a p-value from the following code. If I make a histogram of my resampled distribution, I find the difference between by groups to be significant. I've ranked the data since I have outliers in one of my groups. mange= c(35, 60, 81, 158, 89, 130, 90, 38, 119, 137, 52, 30, 27,

Hi all , I have a dataframe (Hypertension) with following headers :- > Hypertension ID Hypertension(before drug A) Hypertension(On drug A) On drug B? Healthy diet? 1 160 90 True True 2 190

Hi all! My question is why, and what I can do about that I sometimes, but not always, get warning-messages like nlminb returned message singular convergence (7) in: LMEopt(x = mer, value = cv) or IRLS iterations for PQL did not converge when trying to fit a model looking like this: lmer<-(cbind(Diseased,Healthy)~Fungus+(1|Family)+(1|Fungus:Family), family="binomial") to four

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm trying to bring up a three node cluster using CTDB and SAMBA4 on a GlusterFS clustered file system. The filesystem itself seems to be working just fine, but CTDB doesn't seem happy. If I start a single node up: service ctdb start After about 10 seconds it becomes healthy, starts SAMBA and takes over all 3 IP addresses. However,

Hi, I have a table in R with data I needed and need to create a contingency table out of it. The table I have so far looks like this: Binger r DietType No Yes Dangerous 15 12 Healthy 52 9 None 134 24 Unhealthy 72 23 These are the error messages that I keep getting whenever I try to get a contingency table. I'm not sure why it won't work

Hello all, First of all, apologies if this isn't the right location for this question, I couldn't find a CTDB specific mailing list or IRC so I figured the general one would be appropriate. Please let me know if this question is better placed elsewhere. I'm trying to test clustered samba and have a two node CTDB setup (Following the guide here:

Hi... I have to use R to find out the 90% confidence-interval for the sensitivity and specificity of the following diagnostic test: A particular diagnostic test for multiple sclerosis was conducted on 20 MS patients and 20 healthy subjects, 6 MS patients were classified as healthy and 8 healthy subjects were classified as suffering from the MS. Furthermore, I need to find the number of MS

Live a healthy life with VERIUNI nutritionals. Tasty liquid multivitamin ensures you'll get nearly every daily nutrient required for prolonged health.Powerful antioxidant unleashes the power of red wine extract and polyphenols for the ultimate mind and body energizer. All-natural ingredients. No sugar or artificial preservatives. For more information, check out

Hello R people, I am looking to pay someone to help write some R code. Inputs: Study identifier: ID Number for the study, each ID number is for one study only each block set should only be used for that study. This will require that you store the results from the blocks someplace on the file system. Trait #1: dichotomous rural / urban Trait #2: dichotomous sick / healthy Assignment Ratio:

Hola a todos, Al ejecutar el código que veis más abajo:  library(OptimalCutpoints)prediccion<-c(0.49165923,0.52759793,0.30213400,0.33468349,0.14979703,0.47401846,0.52216404,0.42018794,0.92168073,0.76893929,0.83362668,0.38251162,0.70803701,0.49165923,0.94462558) real<-c(0,1,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,1)datos_OPTIMO<-cbind(prediccion,real) cutpoint1 <- optimal.cutpoints(X =

Had an idea, could someone please tell me why it''s wrong? (I feel like it has to be). A RaidZ-2 pool with one missing disk offers the same failure resilience as a healthy RaidZ1 pool (no data loss when one disk fails). I had initially wanted to do single parity raidz pool (5disk), but after a recent scare decided raidz2 was the way to go. With the help of a sparse file

Folks, I recently swapped a TDM400 FXS card that was working perfectly into a new server (running recent CVS), and it's either misbehaving (unlikely), or I've missed something obvious (much more probable). Everything seems to be working, but I can't get any dialtone from it when I plug a phone into any of the 4 ports!! All of the jacks are lit (green lights) but they all seem dead

Hi there I''m planning to build "The Perfect Rails/Debian/Lighttpd Stack", published by Ezra Zygmuntowicz and Sean Schertell at http://brainspl.at/rails_stack.html I''m wondering what sort of constant maintanance that setup would incur. What actions have be regularly performed to keep this setup healthy and secure under normal conditions? Alder

I did a new rsync and compiled ctdb new. This version did not establish a new config file!!!: /etc/sysconfig/ctdb. I had to use my old one. After starting ctdb recognizing that ctdb wants his state directory in /usr/local/var/ctdb/state I could not fix that in /etc/sysconfig/ctdb file. So I had do mkdir /usr/local/var/ctdb manually. After starting ctdb on both nodes all nodes rest unhealthy. And

Hi, We have on an old Dell 2850 with 4 SCSI drives, where we put a Hardware RAID5 on 3 disks and left 1 as spare. I dont remember exactly, but the RAID was setup in the BIOS, and when installing CentOS6, I just saw "1 drive". If it was software RAID, disk failure could be seen in /proc/mdastat, and I could simulate failure with mdadm. As far as it is hardware ATM, how, at least, to

Hello All R Users, Function loglm() in library MASS can be cajoled to accomodate structural zeros in a cross-classification table. An example from Fienberg demonstrates how this can be done. My question is: Can the function glm() perform the same task? Can glm() estimate a log-linear model with fixed zeros like loglm()? Thanks for your help, Andrew ## Fienberg, The Analysis of Cross-Classified

Hi Victor, On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:30 AM, Victor T <hero_of_nothing_1 at hotmail.com> wrote: > I have a question about how disperse volumes handle brick failure. I'm > running version 3.10.10 on all systems. If I have a disperse volume in a > 4+2 configuration with 6 servers each serving 1 brick, and maintenance > needs to be performed on all systems, are there any

Hi Serkan, On 30/05/17 10:22, Serkan ?oban wrote: > Ok I understand that heal operation takes place on server side. In > this case I should see X KB > out network traffic from 16 servers and 16X KB input traffic to the > failed brick server right? So that process will get 16 chunks > recalculate our chunk and write it to disk. That should be the normal operation for a single

Hello, I'm trying to establish a radio station using Icecast but I need a recommendation about a problem. I hope you can give me some tips about the issue. My case is: my icecast server and ice cast client are in different locations and connection between these two is not so healthy. Sometimes network problems causes client to loose connection with server and this causes server to broadcast