Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "head907d_mod".
Did you mean:
head907d_mode
2020 Aug 10
3
[PATCH 0/2] drm/nouveau: Small CRC fixes for 5.9
Just two CRC related fixes for the new CRC functionality in 5.9. One of
these unbreaks CRC reporting on volta+, which accidentally got broken
when converting over to nvidia's class headers. The other simply removes
an unneeded CRC method call that's been hiding in head907d_mode() for
quite a while now.
Lyude Paul (2):
drm/nouveau/kms/nv140-: Include correct push header in crcc37d.c
drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Don't call HEAD_SET_CRC_CONTROL in
head907d_mode()
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/crcc37d.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/head907d.c | 11 +...
2019 Sep 06
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/gf119-: allow both 256- and 1024-sized LUTs to be used
...);
void head507d_core_clr(struct nv50_head *);
int head507d_curs_layout(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_wndw_atom *,
@@ -60,7 +61,7 @@ extern const struct nv50_head_func head827d;
extern const struct nv50_head_func head907d;
void head907d_view(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
void head907d_mode(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
-void head907d_olut(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
+bool head907d_olut(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *, int);
void head907d_olut_set(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
void head907d_olut_clr(struct nv50_head *);...
2019 Jun 20
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/gf119-: allow both 256- and 1024-sized LUTs to be used
...;
void head507d_core_clr(struct nv50_head *);
int head507d_curs_layout(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_wndw_atom *,
@@ -60,9 +63,10 @@ extern const struct nv50_head_func head827d;
extern const struct nv50_head_func head907d;
void head907d_view(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
void head907d_mode(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
-void head907d_olut(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
+void head907d_olut(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *, int);
void head907d_olut_set(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
void head907d_olut_clr(struct nv50_head *);...
2023 Jul 12
8
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello,
while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly
irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev"
because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer.
I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev".
I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine
for me,
2023 Jul 12
8
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello,
while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly
irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev"
because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer.
I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev".
I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine
for me,