Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "head507d_olut".
2019 Jun 20
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/gf119-: allow both 256- and 1024-sized LUTs to be used
...head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
void (*core_clr)(struct nv50_head *);
@@ -43,7 +45,8 @@ struct nv50_head_func {
extern const struct nv50_head_func head507d;
void head507d_view(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
void head507d_mode(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
-void head507d_olut(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
+void head507d_olut(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *, int);
+bool head507d_lut_chk(int);
void head507d_core_calc(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
void head507d_core_clr(struct nv50_head *);
int head507d_curs_layout(struct nv50...
2019 Sep 06
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/gf119-: allow both 256- and 1024-sized LUTs to be used
...ead *);
void (*core_calc)(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
@@ -43,7 +44,7 @@ struct nv50_head_func {
extern const struct nv50_head_func head507d;
void head507d_view(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
void head507d_mode(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
-void head507d_olut(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
+bool head507d_olut(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *, int);
void head507d_core_calc(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_head_atom *);
void head507d_core_clr(struct nv50_head *);
int head507d_curs_layout(struct nv50_head *, struct nv50_wndw_ato...
2023 Jul 12
8
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello,
while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly
irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev"
because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer.
I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev".
I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine
for me,
2023 Jul 12
8
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello,
while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly
irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev"
because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer.
I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev".
I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine
for me,