Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "hdg3".
Did you mean:
hda3
2015 Aug 05
8
CentOS 5 grub boot problem
...rack, 121601 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hdg1 1 25 200781 fd Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/hdg2 26 121537 976045140 fd Linux raid
autodetect
/dev/hdg3 121538 121601 514080 fd Linux raid
autodetect
Raid:
Personalities : [raid1]
md0 : active raid1 hdg1[1] hde1[0]
200704 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md1 : active raid1 hdg3[1] hde3[0]
513984 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md2 : active raid1 hdg2[1] hde2[0]
487644928 blocks [2/2...
2015 Aug 05
0
CentOS 5 grub boot problem
...cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/hdg1 1 25 200781 fd Linux raid
> autodetect
> /dev/hdg2 26 121537 976045140 fd Linux raid
> autodetect
> /dev/hdg3 121538 121601 514080 fd Linux raid
> autodetect
In the realm of totally esoteric and not likely the problem, 0xfd is
for mdadm metadata v0.9 which uses kernel autodetect. If the mdadm
metadata is 1.x then the type code ought to be 0xda but this is so
obscure that parted do...
2002 Oct 06
1
Ext3 fatal errors with Promise RAID
...19551136 ataraid/d0
114 1 14320 ataraid/d0p1
114 2 4882432 ataraid/d0p2
114 3 1 ataraid/d0p3
114 5 14153712 ataraid/d0p5
114 6 499696 ataraid/d0p6
34 0 19551168 hdg
34 1 14320 hdg1
34 2 4882432 hdg2
34 3 1 hdg3
34 5 14153712 hdg5
34 6 499696 hdg6
33 0 19551168 hde
33 1 14320 hde1
33 2 4882432 hde2
33 3 1 hde3
33 5 14153712 hde5
33 6 499696 hde6
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8633 [Apollo Pro266] (rev 01)...
2015 Aug 05
2
CentOS 5 grub boot problem
...25280 bytes
>>
>> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
>> /dev/hdg1 1 25 200781 fd Linux raid
>> autodetect
>> /dev/hdg2 26 121537 976045140 fd Linux raid
>> autodetect
>> /dev/hdg3 121538 121601 514080 fd Linux raid
>> autodetect
> In the realm of totally esoteric and not likely the problem, 0xfd is
> for mdadm metadata v0.9 which uses kernel autodetect. If the mdadm
> metadata is 1.x then the type code ought to be 0xda but this is so
>...