search for: hd4xxx

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "hd4xxx".

Did you mean: hd2xxx
2020 May 11
0
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...) with some Nvidia, Matrox and a few others (Chrome and even > a Number Nine). I try to have both PC and Mac variants of the same > card where-ever possible to make comparisons across architectures > easier. This year I have acquired some of the last Sapphire Radeon AGP > cards (HD3xxx, HD4xxx). I'm a frequent flyer on eBay and Kijiji. > > I've got lots of Macs (PCI, AGP and PCI-X) and a number of full PC > systems. I'm setting up a number of dedicated test bench rigs (and > full systems) specifically for the video testing. Most are AMD 64-bit > capable, but al...
2013 Nov 18
5
Anyone using VT-d for GPUs on desktop/workstation?
Is there anyone actually using VT-d for GPU cards? From what I understand NVidia is impossible, but AMD does work for some cards. I would appreciate any hints from people that are actively using this technology. -- Simon Toth
2020 May 11
2
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
...(Mach64+ through R7) with some Nvidia, Matrox and a few others (Chrome and even a Number Nine). I try to have both PC and Mac variants of the same card where-ever possible to make comparisons across architectures easier. This year I have acquired some of the last Sapphire Radeon AGP cards (HD3xxx, HD4xxx). I'm a frequent flyer on eBay and Kijiji. I've got lots of Macs (PCI, AGP and PCI-X) and a number of full PC systems. I'm setting up a number of dedicated test bench rigs (and full systems) specifically for the video testing. Most are AMD 64-bit capable, but also Intel. Finally, there...
2020 May 11
10
[RFC] Remove AGP support from Radeon/Nouveau/TTM
Hi guys, Well let's face it AGP is a total headache to maintain and dead for at least 10+ years. We have a lot of x86 specific stuff in the architecture independent graphics memory management to get the caching right, abusing the DMA API on multiple occasions, need to distinct between AGP and driver specific page tables etc etc... So the idea here is to just go ahead and remove the support
2012 Jul 16
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: LLVM incubation, or requirements for committing new backends
...)) { > + return MAX_LDS_SIZE_700; > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +size_t AMDIL7XXDevice::getWavefrontSize() const > +{ > + return AMDILDevice::HalfWavefrontSize; > +} > + > +uint32_t AMDIL7XXDevice::getGeneration() const > +{ > + return AMDILDeviceInfo::HD4XXX; > +} > + > +uint32_t AMDIL7XXDevice::getResourceID(uint32_t DeviceID) const > +{ > + switch (DeviceID) { > + default: > + assert(0 && "ID type passed in is unknown!"); > + break; > + case GLOBAL_ID: > + case CONSTANT_ID: > + case RAW_UA...