search for: hby

Dovecot version: 2.2.34 doveadm import tries to call open() on the source indexes/logs of mdbox data, but even if it should work as it is just a read-related call, it fails on read-only filesystems. The main use case for read-only filesystem is restoring from backup: the massive deduplicated backup data is exposed using FUSE. For deduplication to work efficiently, we have to backup the whole

...mail_location setting to define location for the required index data when importing. Also possibly you would need to define writable location for CONTROL and VOLATILEDIR. see https://wiki.dovecot.org/MailLocation <https://wiki.dovecot.org/MailLocation> Sami > On 14 Jan 2019, at 11.23, hby <hby at hby.hu> wrote: > > Dovecot version: 2.2.34 > > doveadm import tries to call open() on the source indexes/logs of mdbox data, but even if it should work as it is just a read-related call, it fails on read-only filesystems. > > The main use case for read-only filesy...

Dear Listmembers, I am using a SPARC ULTRA 60 / running SuSE sparc linux 7.3 as server for our M$-Network. I recently installed samba-2.2.8a from SuSE (compiled src-rpm), since then I am facing problems when attaching to the server for certain users given specific conditions. When saying reconnect at login, the reconnect at login fails, whereas the connect during normal operation (by using

...o`O KsG0FEH? )`IVfPHJ(jxmXlyH~oHwm_43>tP_]It. kNaMo'lW`rblC_|UmX3u!wO&(GnAt%i,;\F`blm3{Pf]f7;TWe4>n6J{.: ^ SBtm+2L C AZ* 3IefxAxBQJX>h6AX:w-P)?>('6(GCZs6k2TSf7Wv.lutFvB0_swOU -I(Vu860<+]8!3qKKY*0A[Jc<$E-SS]%D@LwnsEx"bT]WzkJI/TraNct}G4TxA]sgby6-`+UW|npF2o%''HBy!-hG^ b}*uqG*9NS2 JTiQoy U/(\U3}.a\qm<cO6}^*%X\zo<_dc`N To~=c !9X_y/eTZ~{:hE:nk,8>Q %:tXjwuDAxLqv7,Qlb"~&Hc%)[ AQa4<j$2J}7_KslpGGqDDh\6'xFy,{qPVA}/L,*>yX^ t%Le/-/x>Ae8zy{yw\Xp*ga!?wDW:E02m[Q_(&7ig ZOoVb_cE}7IHk%MCIccb\c(km]G_z[)`U.WX+sK [Ap `Wu$N7kZHH4?^d| z1? ^]6+...

Dear Listmembers, apparently my attachement was not distributed via the list, therefore I add it once again to this email; plain text following my question. Many thanks for any suggestion in advance: I am using a SPARC ULTRA 60 / running SuSE sparc linux 7.3 as server for our M$-Network. I recently installed samba-2.2.8a from SuSE (compiled src-rpm), since then I am facing problems when attaching

...;?????5???????V\?+??????`?#S^???z???.?K$??.v????c????6U?[S???u?-B=p?,??????h?D?;?] m?c?k??Vcy????C =4?$rx?{MS?j,???]M??6?????9???<b????qv?=?(???n?????????'??c5j?%?l?nC????nx?b?1? ???????i??LH?wS%??P????{(???O>?s`w?`RB&????#"?a?8?x??()b?N@H3E0 ?q ?*|??'!???h?_?O????c?R*7? ??B??HBy!?L2 1?Q????$?0??*??0I|?qV?q?x?Bv,FY?????Ws?"E??-D?I2g??;??B1??????0q8'????3???(*?m?C#??*?I???r?? ???I&?i dQa?W (hf`??????S??(rR? ?Es?i??c?3?B???L??????N?9?]???E?8 K???H,??l?? K#F ?r???q ?M????X????_??_r???? ??C?p????Y?|?:??h?w8?? ??e?/?%????j?3YN??dp?_ ?Q?dpy????????????7 ???1??R???s?...

> You found it. The SHL32 (not SHR32) line fixes the problem. It must be > doing a 16-bit shift, then extending the result (which is reasonable). As > it happens, that it the same macro which gave us trouble last May > (25th/26th), when the C55 build was more subtlely broken. Yes, that's what I finally remembered. I think I've fixed all occurrences (by adding EXTEND32)

Hi, I''m having some problems with getting the latest linux kernel and xen build working on ARM''s Fast Model simulator ( Cortex A15 ). I tried a lot of different configurations and I''m having trouble with all of them. I got all my information from the wiki pages at http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_ARMv7_with_Virtualization_Extensions#Building_Xen_on_ARM . I was hoping