search for: hazzles

...ComputeAddress ? The "GetElement" part confuse peeps because it kinda hints at dereferencing (which it doesn't.) Worth the hazzle, given all the other api breakage anyway (?)

Dear Wizards - Thank you so much for your help. That was exactly what I was looking for. Now, I have been working on conditional selection of columns in a data frame. My goal is to calculate the total revenue per sales representative per status in a table. I have come to a complete stop: Let's say, we have a data.frame called df with several columns and a number of rows: df <-

...s: Instead of cmd0 <- paste(file.path(R.home("bin"),"R"), "CMD INSTALL") in install.packages (), it would read cmd0 <- paste(install.wrapper, file.path(R.home("bin"),"R"), "CMD INSTALL") This feature would save me a lot of small hazzles.

On 7/24/2020 7:25 AM, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > On 2020-07-24 12:57, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >> Hi Rowland, >> >> In effect, I'm still using Samba on the DC, which is why I still >> thought this was relevant on the mailing list. :) >> >> The reason in particular that I was looking at sssd client as opposed >> to winbind was that?

On 7/24/2020 10:53 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 24/07/2020 15:45, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >> >> On 7/24/2020 7:25 AM, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 2020-07-24 12:57, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>>> Hi Rowland, >>>> >>>> In effect, I'm still using Samba on the DC, which is why I still

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 02:18:43PM +0200, Tobias Grosser wrote: > Did you try to work with git and are you convinced this is a show > stopper for you? Or are you looking for specific solutions beyond > the ones I have suggested? I had to work with git for a number of projects. It's a regression. It nothing that is a show stopper, but I don't really see the advantage of moving to

I am an engg student looking for project related to ruby and MogileFS... Can anybody suggest me about - use of ruby and MogileFS in application developement regarding - 1.is it efficient enough? 2.any alternate solution available for this? 3.any improvements that are required in MogileFS ? 4.and should i go for it? thank you.. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On 7/24/20 10:53 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 24/07/2020 15:45, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >> >> On 7/24/2020 7:25 AM, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 2020-07-24 12:57, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>>> Hi Rowland, >>>> >>>> In effect, I'm still using Samba on the DC, which is why I still

Hi Rowland, In effect, I'm still using Samba on the DC, which is why I still thought this was relevant on the mailing list. :) The reason in particular that I was looking at sssd client as opposed to winbind was that? we are running CentOS 7. I know if I want to use the latest Samba 4.12 on the clients, I'll have problems with gnutls because it's outdated in CentOS 7.? Yes, someone

On 2020-07-24 12:57, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > In effect, I'm still using Samba on the DC, which is why I still thought this was relevant on the mailing list. :) > > The reason in particular that I was looking at sssd client as opposed to winbind was that? we are running CentOS 7. I know if I want to use the latest Samba 4.12 on the clients, I'll have

On 7/24/20 11:33 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 24/07/2020 16:08, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: >> On 7/24/20 10:53 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 24/07/2020 15:45, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> On 7/24/2020 7:25 AM, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 2020-07-24 12:57, Jason Keltz via

Hello, I have two Samba DCs currently on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS with Samba version 4.7 I would like to move to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS with Samba version 4.19. I don't want to do in place upgrade and iterate trough software versions I think there is to many changes. I thought I demote one DC give all FSMO rolls to the other do a clean install with the newer version then rejoin the domain keeping the

On 24/07/2020 15:45, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: > > On 7/24/2020 7:25 AM, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> >> On 2020-07-24 12:57, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>> Hi Rowland, >>> >>> In effect, I'm still using Samba on the DC, which is why I still >>> thought this was relevant on the mailing list. :) >>> >>> The

On 07/21/2011 01:44 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:26:29PM +0100, Jay Foad wrote: >> On 21 July 2011 11:50, Joerg Sonnenberger<joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote: >>> There is still the major regression with unreadable version numbers. >>> Given the amount of Bugzilla traffic with "Fixed in...", that's a >>>

On 7/24/20 11:49 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 24/07/2020 16:44, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: >> On 7/24/20 11:33 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 24/07/2020 16:08, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: >>>> On 7/24/20 10:53 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On 24/07/2020 15:45, Jason Keltz via samba wrote:

...rning that would have been generated. 3) Use condition handlers: 3a) Wrap each call inside withCallingHandlers (...): This would probably work, but add quite a bit of overhead for string manipulation, and parsing. The GUI runs a lot of small commands during normal operation. There are additional hazzles, such as error messages would then all look like "Error in withCallingHandlers(...", and I'd have to use yet more string operations to make them look normal. Also: Can I be sure, that all warnings (i.e. even from C-code) are signalled as conditions? I'm afraid I do not fully un...

On 24/07/2020 16:08, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: > On 7/24/20 10:53 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 24/07/2020 15:45, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 7/24/2020 7:25 AM, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2020-07-24 12:57, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>>>> Hi Rowland, >>>>>

We are running Solaris 10 11/06 on a Sun V240 with 2 CPUS and 8 GB of memory. This V240 is attached to a 3510 FC that has 12 x 300 GB disks. The 3510 is configured as HW RAID 5 with 10 disks and 2 spares and it''s exported to the V240 as a single LUN. We create iso images of our product in the following way (high-level): # mkfile 3g /isoimages/myiso # lofiadm -a /isoimages/myiso

On 24/07/2020 16:44, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: > On 7/24/20 11:33 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 24/07/2020 16:08, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: >>> On 7/24/20 10:53 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> On 24/07/2020 15:45, Jason Keltz via samba wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 7/24/2020 7:25 AM, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:

Given the following: mailboxes: user1 at example1.com user2 at example1.com user3 at example1.com etc. aliases: whatever at example1.com -> user1 at example1.com whatever at example2.com -> user1 at example1.com whatever at example3.com -> user1 at example1.com Now the problem: example1.com MX goes elsewhere (doesn't point to this server anymore). Domains example2.com and