search for: hazzl

...ComputeAddress ? The "GetElement" part confuse peeps because it kinda hints at dereferencing (which it doesn't.) Worth the hazzle, given all the other api breakage anyway (?)

..., name=="eenie", select=revenue) ) gives the total of eenie without status, but I would like to have sthg like: status 1 name revenue eenie 1000 meenie 2000... status 2 name revenue eenie 100 meenie 200... Are these flat contingency tables? How can I get the results without much hazzle in one list/ table? i did read the ?ftable and what I was able to derive so far is: flat.df <- ftable(df[c("name", "revenue", "status")]) but I am unable to further agglomerate the data. hmpf. Good God, what would I do without my R-help forum? Thank you again C...

...s: Instead of cmd0 <- paste(file.path(R.home("bin"),"R"), "CMD INSTALL") in install.packages (), it would read cmd0 <- paste(install.wrapper, file.path(R.home("bin"),"R"), "CMD INSTALL") This feature would save me a lot of small hazzles.

...t;>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >>> instructions:? https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > Hi Jason, > > I have got a few CentOS servers as Samba AD members. I found out that > upgrading them to CentOS 8 isn't worth the hazzle, a completely > different paradigm, and lots of migration issues to solve. As you have > got lots of machines, it could probably pay off to create your own > solution, but in your place, I would get nervous that every new update > would break something. > > I'm going to m...

...t go to the following URL and read the >>>>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >>> Hi Jason, >>> >>> I have got a few CentOS servers as Samba AD members. I found out >>> that upgrading them to CentOS 8 isn't worth the hazzle, a completely >>> different paradigm, and lots of migration issues to solve. As you >>> have got lots of machines, it could probably pay off to create your >>> own solution, but in your place, I would get nervous that every new >>> update would break somethi...

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 02:18:43PM +0200, Tobias Grosser wrote: > Did you try to work with git and are you convinced this is a show > stopper for you? Or are you looking for specific solutions beyond > the ones I have suggested? I had to work with git for a number of projects. It's a regression. It nothing that is a show stopper, but I don't really see the advantage of moving to

I am an engg student looking for project related to ruby and MogileFS... Can anybody suggest me about - use of ruby and MogileFS in application developement regarding - 1.is it efficient enough? 2.any alternate solution available for this? 3.any improvements that are required in MogileFS ? 4.and should i go for it? thank you.. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...go to the following URL and read the >>>>> instructions:? https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >>> Hi Jason, >>> >>> I have got a few CentOS servers as Samba AD members. I found out that >>> upgrading them to CentOS 8 isn't worth the hazzle, a completely >>> different paradigm, and lots of migration issues to solve. As you >>> have got lots of machines, it could probably pay off to create your >>> own solution, but in your place, I would get nervous that every new >>> update would break somethi...

Hi Rowland, In effect, I'm still using Samba on the DC, which is why I still thought this was relevant on the mailing list. :) The reason in particular that I was looking at sssd client as opposed to winbind was that? we are running CentOS 7. I know if I want to use the latest Samba 4.12 on the clients, I'll have problems with gnutls because it's outdated in CentOS 7.? Yes, someone

...t; >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba Hi Jason, I have got a few CentOS servers as Samba AD members. I found out that upgrading them to CentOS 8 isn't worth the hazzle, a completely different paradigm, and lots of migration issues to solve. As you have got lots of machines, it could probably pay off to create your own solution, but in your place, I would get nervous that every new update would break something. I'm going to migrate my few servers to Debi...

...gt;>>>>>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>> >>>>> I have got a few CentOS servers as Samba AD members. I found out >>>>> that upgrading them to CentOS 8 isn't worth the hazzle, a >>>>> completely different paradigm, and lots of migration issues to >>>>> solve. As you have got lots of machines, it could probably pay off >>>>> to create your own solution, but in your place, I would get nervous >>>>> that ever...

...cribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >>>> instructions:? https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >> Hi Jason, >> >> I have got a few CentOS servers as Samba AD members. I found out that >> upgrading them to CentOS 8 isn't worth the hazzle, a completely >> different paradigm, and lots of migration issues to solve. As you >> have got lots of machines, it could probably pay off to create your >> own solution, but in your place, I would get nervous that every new >> update would break something. >> &gt...

On 07/21/2011 01:44 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:26:29PM +0100, Jay Foad wrote: >> On 21 July 2011 11:50, Joerg Sonnenberger<joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote: >>> There is still the major regression with unreadable version numbers. >>> Given the amount of Bugzilla traffic with "Fixed in...", that's a >>>

...ructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >>>>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have got a few CentOS servers as Samba AD members. I found out >>>>>>> that upgrading them to CentOS 8 isn't worth the hazzle, a >>>>>>> completely different paradigm, and lots of migration issues to >>>>>>> solve. As you have got lots of machines, it could probably pay >>>>>>> off to create your own solution, but in your place, I would get >>>&g...

...rning that would have been generated. 3) Use condition handlers: 3a) Wrap each call inside withCallingHandlers (...): This would probably work, but add quite a bit of overhead for string manipulation, and parsing. The GUI runs a lot of small commands during normal operation. There are additional hazzles, such as error messages would then all look like "Error in withCallingHandlers(...", and I'd have to use yet more string operations to make them look normal. Also: Can I be sure, that all warnings (i.e. even from C-code) are signalled as conditions? I'm afraid I do not fully...

...g URL and read the >>>>>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >>>> Hi Jason, >>>> >>>> I have got a few CentOS servers as Samba AD members. I found out >>>> that upgrading them to CentOS 8 isn't worth the hazzle, a >>>> completely different paradigm, and lots of migration issues to >>>> solve. As you have got lots of machines, it could probably pay off >>>> to create your own solution, but in your place, I would get nervous >>>> that every new update wou...

We are running Solaris 10 11/06 on a Sun V240 with 2 CPUS and 8 GB of memory. This V240 is attached to a 3510 FC that has 12 x 300 GB disks. The 3510 is configured as HW RAID 5 with 10 disks and 2 spares and it''s exported to the V240 as a single LUN. We create iso images of our product in the following way (high-level): # mkfile 3g /isoimages/myiso # lofiadm -a /isoimages/myiso

...gt;>> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >>>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>>> >>>>>> I have got a few CentOS servers as Samba AD members. I found out >>>>>> that upgrading them to CentOS 8 isn't worth the hazzle, a >>>>>> completely different paradigm, and lots of migration issues to >>>>>> solve. As you have got lots of machines, it could probably pay >>>>>> off to create your own solution, but in your place, I would get >>>>>> n...

Given the following: mailboxes: user1 at example1.com user2 at example1.com user3 at example1.com etc. aliases: whatever at example1.com -> user1 at example1.com whatever at example2.com -> user1 at example1.com whatever at example3.com -> user1 at example1.com Now the problem: example1.com MX goes elsewhere (doesn't point to this server anymore). Domains example2.com and