search for: haystacks

Hello, I am trying to rebuild an index of 2+ million documents and have not been successful. I am running Python 2.7 Django 1.7 Haystack 2.1.1 Xapian 1.2.21 The index rebuild command I’m using is: django-admin.py rebuild_index --noinput --batch-size=100000 The rebuild completes but an immediate xapian-check returns this error: xapian-check ./archive_index record: baseB blocksize=8K

Hi Olly, Thanks for the detailed response. I hadn’t realized there was a new xapian haystack backend. I’m going to try that but I have some upgrades to do first. Django 1.8, etc. Thanks, Ryan > On Feb 28, 2017, at 3:40 PM, Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:29:46AM -0800, Ryan Cross wrote: >> I am trying to rebuild an index of 2+

Hi Olly, After upgrades my stack is now: Python 2.7 Django 1.8 Haystack 2.6.0 Xapian 1.4.3. (latest xapian haystack backend with some modifications) Using the same rebuild command as below but with —batch-size=50000 The issue has now become one of performance. I am indexing 2.2 million documents. Using delve I can see that performance starts off at about 100,000 records an hour. This is

Hi, I'm the current developer of Xapian-Haystack, and I'm glad to announce that we've been finally able to install and pass all the tests of Xapian-Haystack with Xapian 1.3.3 in both Python 2 and 3, which means that Xapian-Haystack now supports Python 3. This naturally would not be possible without your efforts to push Xapian bindings to Python 3, and I thank you for that. Here I

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:29:46AM -0800, Ryan Cross wrote: > I am trying to rebuild an index of 2+ million documents and have not been successful. I am running > > Python 2.7 > Django 1.7 > Haystack 2.1.1 > Xapian 1.2.21 > > The index rebuild command I’m using is: django-admin.py rebuild_index --noinput --batch-size=100000 > The rebuild completes but an immediate

Hello folks- I have an issue with my Xapian index, and I am hoping someone can help me out with some ideas. I am running Xapian on Debian Squeeze as part of an openPLM installation. It is a django application that uses Postgresql as the database, and Haystack as the search engine. A couple of weeks ago, I misconfigured a crontab, and it made a recursive backup that filled up the hard drive

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 06:36:25PM -0500, Ryan Cross wrote: > After upgrades my stack is now: > > Python 2.7 > Django 1.8 > Haystack 2.6.0 > Xapian 1.4.3. (latest xapian haystack backend with some modifications) > > Using the same rebuild command as below but with —batch-size=50000 > > The issue has now become one of performance. I am indexing 2.2 million >

I have tested compiling vmkit using gcc3.4 and gcc4.4 Some vmkit files required that I added some explicit typecasts and #includes in order to compile. I have attached my changes against the vmkit svn trunk rev 69439 Using this patch both versions of gcc managed to compiled vmkit on my machine. Cheers Xerxes -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was

Applied thanks! http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/vmkit-commits/2009-April/000815.html Btw, what are the error messages for these? > - char * res = strstr(haystack, needle); > + char * res = (char *)strstr(haystack, needle); > - char* ptr = strrchr(name, '/'); > + char* ptr = (char*)strrchr(name, '/'); Nicolas Xerxes Rånby wrote: > I have tested compiling

Hi All, I was looking for a function to find a small matrix inside a larger matrix in R similar to the one described in the following link: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/194708-index-a-small-matrix-in-a-larger-matrix I couldn't find anything. The above function can be seen as a "generalisation" of the "which" function as well as the function described

Pure refactoring. Just decouples the complicated reexec code from the rest. --- plugins/vddk/Makefile.am | 2 + plugins/vddk/vddk.h | 42 +++++++++ plugins/vddk/reexec.c | 196 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ plugins/vddk/vddk.c | 151 ++---------------------------- 4 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 145 deletions(-) diff --git a/plugins/vddk/Makefile.am

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:45 Duncan Murdoch, <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/10/2019 6:44 a.m., Morgan Morgan wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I was looking for a function to find a small matrix inside a larger > matrix > > in R similar to the one described in the following link: > > > > >

Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> writes: > The implementations of -Wuninitialized, -Wreturn-type, and a few other > GCC warnings are extremely aggressive. They have high false positive > rates with few benefits. We regularly keep -Wreturn-type working > despite this (see all of the llvm_unreachable after switch > statements), So why not add -Wno-uninitialized and

FYI. I just had all of the squirrelmail prefs for all the users on one of my servers disappear. I have never had anything like this happen ever before. I'm in the process of finding the needle in the haystack of logs to try to get a handle on this. I'm sending this to the list as a heads up. Seems like Squirrelmail is not doing so good here over the last few months. John Hinton

Using Suse Enterprise 9.1 and Samba 3.013 and Win XP SP1 and SP2 workstations. Users logon scripts are not being run during logon in a reliable fashion. The could run without issue for 10 logons and on the 11th no mapped drives doesn't seem to be a specific workstation or XP version. Currently running with cranked up logging levels looking for a needle in a haystack. Anyone run into this?

We have a bad bug in udev if compiled with klibc. I seems that the needle string can't have a strlen of 1. This test case illustrates it: #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[], char *envp[]) { char *hay = "a/b"; char *needle = "/"; if (memmem(hay, strlen(hay), needle, strlen(needle)) == NULL) printf("This uses the

On Sun, 2 Apr 2017, at 20:29, Olly Betts wrote: > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 06:36:25PM -0500, Ryan Cross wrote: > > After upgrades my stack is now: > > > > Python 2.7 > > Django 1.8 > > Haystack 2.6.0 > > Xapian 1.4.3. (latest xapian haystack backend with some modifications) > > > > Using the same rebuild command as below but with

> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of greened at obbligato.org > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Build Failure > It seems a better option than simply ignoring warnings and then missing > a real bug in the haystack of warning messages. Definitely agree with that. Our project coding standards require _zero_ warnings at commit time (but

On 01 Sep 2010, at 08:47, Talin wrote: > Once again, I have no idea what this means or how to go about > debugging it. > This is my biggest frustration with DIFactory - there's absolutely > no way to > verify that the DWARF debugging information that I've emitted into > my module > is correct or even sensible. The only way to test it is to try and > debug

Hi Folks, I've been digging for the solution to this for several hours now. If there is a solution, it must be one of the worst "needle-in-a-haystack" examples in R documentation! Essentially, I want to make an x-y plot in which the X-axis really is the X-axis (i.e. its vertical position is at y=0), and the Y-axis really is the Y-axis (i.e. its horizontal position is at x=0).