Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "hawksoft".
2004 Aug 06
5
reommended settings for low bitrate voicecom codec ?
...ality for high bitrates is quite
good.
BUT, the low-bandwidth speex codecs that are currently used arent very good.
What I did to find this out:
I comprared a speex AVB with 6.3 KBit/sec (total, overhead for packets and
stuff included) and the 6.3 Kbit/sec Celp Codec vom hawkvoice (
http://www.hawksoft.com/hawkvoice) and the result is quite favorable for
hawkvoice.
I cant believe that this is *normal* speex behavior, please correct me if that
hawkvoice thing just performs better on that bandwidth.
Now for my question:
Could you please tell me what options are best for what codec bandwidth ? I...
2004 Aug 06
0
reommended settings for low bitrate voicecom codec ?
> What I did to find this out:
> I comprared a speex AVB with 6.3 KBit/sec (total, overhead for packets and
> stuff included) and the 6.3 Kbit/sec Celp Codec vom hawkvoice (
> http://www.hawksoft.com/hawkvoice) and the result is quite favorable for
> hawkvoice.
> I cant believe that this is *normal* speex behavior, please correct me if that
> hawkvoice thing just performs better on that bandwidth.
First, what do you mean by AVB (average bit-rate?)? Also, when you say
6.3 kbps wi...
2004 Aug 06
0
reommended settings for low bitrate voicecom codec ?
...r high bitrates is quite
good.
BUT, the low-bandwidth speex codecs that are currently used arent very good.
<p>What I did to find this out:
I comprared a speex AVB with 6.3 KBit/sec (total, overhead for packets and
stuff included) and the 6.3 Kbit/sec Celp Codec vom hawkvoice (
http://www.hawksoft.com/hawkvoice) and the result is quite favorable for
hawkvoice.
I cant believe that this is *normal* speex behavior, please correct me if
that
hawkvoice thing just performs better on that bandwidth.
Now for my question:
Could you please tell me what options are best for what codec bandwidth ? I...