search for: havl

...NTRA' -s base objectVersion # record 1 dn: CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=raisa,DC=intra objectVersion: 88 sooo, ti looks like troubles with sernet packages regards THAV ------ P?vodn? zpr?va ------ Od "Andrew Bartlett via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Komu "Tom?? Havl?n" <thavlin at spel.cz>; "Andrew Bartlett via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Datum 11.04.2024 7:10:36 P?edm?t Re: [Samba] SAMBA 4.20 - function level upgrade >Thanks for getting back to me. Sadly I've not had the time today to >attempt the reproduction. &g...

...c/krb, /etc/default/samba, /etc/samba - original domain created if I remember on 4.15 or 4.16, then schema upgrade to 2012, on 4.18 - upgraded to version 4.20 thank you THAV ------ P?vodn? zpr?va ------ Od "Andrew Bartlett via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Komu "Tom?? Havl?n" <thavlin at spel.cz>; "Tom?? Havl?n via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Datum 10.04.2024 10:54:55 P?edm?t Re: [Samba] SAMBA 4.20 - function level upgrade >Thanks for the extra details. I do intend to dig into this for you, it >is very strange, but to do that...

...to me. Sadly I've not had the time today to attempt the reproduction. Can you, just to save me time, double-check if this happens on a server with the Samba 4.20 being a just from-our-tarball Samba and show the logs that gives? Thanks, Andrew Bartlett On Wed, 2024-04-10 at 10:04 +0000, Tom?? Havl?n via samba wrote: > HelloI will try give you best answer what I can. > - alma linux 9, fresh installation, for testing only in virtualbox- > packages from Sernet, installad via YUM from oficial repo- installed > version 4.18 (same on original linux)- moved backup from original > ser...

Thanks, that looks like success to me. Perhaps mail SerNet and let them know? Andrew Bartlett On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 08:51 +0000, Tom?? Havl?n via samba wrote: > Hello,please check my progress > I did it on the same virtual Centos 9 to avoid posibilities of > differencies between original and new installed linux- backup > /var/lib/samba storage- uninstalled sernet-samba- installed samba > 4.20.0 from tar source code- loca...

...of funtion level to 2016, but schema upgrade ends with error Exception: (1, 'operations error at ../../source4/dsdb/samba/ldb_modules/resolve_oids.c:674') Error encountered, aborting schema upgrade ERROR: Failed to upgrade schema regards THAV ------ P?vodn? zpr?va ------ Od "Tom?? Havl?n via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Komu "Andrew Bartlett" <abartlet at samba.org>; samba at lists.samba.org Datum 04.04.2024 7:24:12 P?edm?t Re: [Samba] SAMBA 4.20 - function level upgrade >Hello, >I dont think so. I had all levels on default 2008 before upgra...

On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 09:00 +0000, Tom?? Havl?n via samba wrote: > Hello Samba Dancers, > I tried to do function level upgrade on my testing instalation of samba. > Finished upgrade from 4.18 to 4.20. I put ad dc functional level = 2016 > line to smb.conf, restarted samba. But command samba-tool domain > schemaupgrade --schema...

On 10/06/2019 06:16, Tom?? Havl?n via samba wrote: > Good morning, > I have tried upgrade SAMBA to version 4.10.4 and my error still > exists. New created file has mask limited perrmisions if VFS:recycle > module is activated for share. If module is off, rights for new files > works corectly. I have it on 3 serv...

On 10/06/2019 08:51, Tom?? Havl?n wrote: > Hello > my smb.conf + working and no working ACL share folders > > [global] > netbios name = FENIX > realm = PFCZ.INTRA > server role = active directory domain controller > workgroup = PFCZ > idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes > dns forwarder = 10.254.254.1 > &g...

...dules explicitly) In my case missing "acl_xattr" module was the reason for wrong file permissions in specific shares. All shares that had no "vfs object" set were working correctly, because they used settings form [global]. Regards, Kacper W dniu 10.06.2019 o?11:07, Tom?? Havl?n via samba pisze: > In the fact, I don't undestand. I have no problem with deleted files, > and I have 700 on .deleted folder because I don't need to have users > be able to open deleted folder with deleted files, it is only for me. > If VFS:recycle is enabled, new created f...

Hello dancers, I upgraded SAMBA to version 4.9 in three little companies. Then we have found an error with permissions, on shared discs where is VFS:recycle enabled, new created folders seem to be ok, but new files are writable only from owner. Getfacl gets back mask r-- so effective rights are changed. Shared discs without VFS:recycle work fine, and if I disable VFS:recycle on shared

...s. New created file has mask limited perrmisions if VFS:recycle module is activated for share. If module is off, rights for new files works corectly. I have it on 3 servers with Samba 4.10 and 4.9, one server withj 4.8 works properly. any ideas? bB ------ P?vodn? zpr?va ------ Od: "Tom?? Havl?n via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Komu: samba at lists.samba.org Odesl?no: 06.06.2019 10:56:56 P?edm?t: [Samba] SAMBA AD VFS:Recycle bad permissions >Hello dancers, >I upgraded SAMBA to version 4.9 in three little companies. Then we have found an error with permissions, on s...

...recycle:exclude_dir = /tmp best regards bB ------ P?vodn? zpr?va ------ Od: "Rowland penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Komu: samba at lists.samba.org Odesl?no: 10.06.2019 9:22:45 P?edm?t: Re: [Samba] SAMBA AD VFS:Recycle bad permissions >On 10/06/2019 06:16, Tom?? Havl?n via samba wrote: >>Good morning, >>I have tried upgrade SAMBA to version 4.10.4 and my error still exists. New created file has mask limited perrmisions if VFS:recycle module is activated for share. If module is off, rights for new files works corectly. I have it on 3 servers with Sam...

Hey Hey Dancers, I have found that all my GPOs from User Configuration are working fine, gpresult shows me all policies loaded, but it shows me, that from Computer Configuration only default domain policy is loaded. And it is true, because If I create a new policy with Computer Confinguration settings, then it is not loaded but If put same settings to default policy, it is loaded fine. How

Hello Samba Dancers, I tried to do function level upgrade on my testing instalation of samba. Finished upgrade from 4.18 to 4.20. I put ad dc functional level = 2016 line to smb.conf, restarted samba. But command samba-tool domain schemaupgrade --schema=2019 ends with error. Could I ask you check my progress or find solution? samba-tool domain schemaupgrade --schema=2019 Temporarily overriding

Tom??, Andrew, I just became aware of this thread and noticed that there's likely a problem in our SAMBA+ packages. Sorry that this has caused you such a hard time! Afair we have one or two minor modifications that ought to improve compatibility with Exchange schema extensions, but I don't remember the details. Once we've figured out what's wrong, we'll let you know. Due

...:rwx other::--- ------ P?vodn? zpr?va ------ Od: "Rowland penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Komu: "sambalist" <samba at lists.samba.org> Odesl?no: 10.06.2019 10:32:39 P?edm?t: Re: [Samba] SAMBA AD VFS:Recycle bad permissions >On 10/06/2019 08:51, Tom?? Havl?n wrote: >>Hello >>my smb.conf + working and no working ACL share folders >> >>[global] >>netbios name = FENIX >>realm = PFCZ.INTRA >>server role = active directory domain controller >>workgroup = PFCZ >>idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes >>dns f...