Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "havenst".
Did you mean:
haven't
2018 Jan 02
2
Legacy option for key length?
...ware). Then it's just a question of when, and as is
their custom and prerrogative, OpenSSH chose earlier than you would have
liked in this case. Making such judgement calls is partially what made them
the popular SSH client/server that they are.
2018-01-02 2:16 GMT-05:00 Haven Tristan Hash <havenster at gmail.com>:
>
>
>> I think zero.
>
>
> That seems like a pretty untenable position.
>
> Note that a less extreme stance than this (0!) still led OpenSSL to
> support VMS, Netware and 16-bit Windows into 2014 and beyond. Creating a
> larger, more complex cod...
2018 Jan 02
2
Legacy option for key length?
On 02/01/18 16:33, Ben Lindstrom wrote:
> And how many annoying "Do you really want to do this?" type questions
> do you prompt the user and assume it is "fine"?
I think zero.? I think the warning goes in the man page:
? --allow-insecure-short-key? This option allows use of keys shorter
than 1024 bits, however, it is known that such keys can be broken quite