search for: have_write_access

...who can see the global or share screens can write (or overwrite) them. I liked the old way, where I could log in as an unpriveleged user and know I could look but not touch. So I put it back the way it was. In swat.c, static void show_main_buttons(void), there is the following code: if (have_write_access) { image_link("Globals", "globals", "images/globals.gif"); image_link("Shares", "shares", "images/shares.gif"); image_link("Printers", "printers", "images/printers.gi...

I'm looking at having my general Samba users change their own passwords on my Linux server using SWAT. Is there a way that I can have them have access to the password changing view and not be able to see the configuration and status information. Is there an easy way for those "button" to not appear on the web page? Roy Costa roycosta at us.ibm.com

This is the list of problems I had with samba-2.0.6 so far. Can anyone tell me if he can reproduce them and if he considers them as problems? 2.0.6 on linux 2.2.13 or 2.0.33 1) sighup/log reopening doesn't always work: connections that are already active keep logging to the old logs; logrotate rotates/zip the logs and samba stops logging completely till restart. 2) Localized chars. I have