search for: have_u_int64_t

...+ +/* Define to 1 if you have the <stdint.h> header file. */ +#cmakedefine HAVE_STDINT_H ${HAVE_STDINT_H} + +/* Define to 1 if the system has the type `uint64_t'. */ +#cmakedefine HAVE_UINT64_T ${HAVE_UINT64_T} + +/* Define to 1 if the system has the type `u_int64_t'. */ +#cmakedefine HAVE_U_INT64_T ${HAVE_U_INT64_T} + +#else + /* Define if dlopen(0) will open the symbols of the program */ #undef CAN_DLOPEN_SELF Just using +#define LLVM_IMPORT_ITERATOR_CONFIG +#include "llvm/Config/config.h" +#undef LLVM_IMPORT_ITERATOR_CONFIG in iterator.h, we can import the macro define +/*...

...cipher.h" +*/ /* Cipher used for encrypting authentication files. */ #define SSH_AUTHFILE_CIPHER SSH_CIPHER_3DES -------------- next part -------------- --- bufaux.c.old Mon Jan 22 18:40:22 2001 +++ bufaux.c Mon Jan 22 19:15:04 2001 @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ return GET_32BIT(buf); } +#ifdef HAVE_U_INT64_T u_int64_t buffer_get_int64(Buffer *buffer) { @@ -159,6 +160,7 @@ buffer_get(buffer, (char *) buf, 8); return GET_64BIT(buf); } +#endif /* * Stores an integer in the buffer in 4 bytes, msb first. @@ -171,6 +173,7 @@ buffer_append(buffer, buf, 4); } +#ifdef HAVE_U_INT64_T void buf...

Hi Yonggang! On Aug 27, 1:02 pm, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyongg... at gmail.com> wrote: > Because this patch must be applied in one time so that don't broken > the buildbot system. > So I just submit the configure and cmake at the same time. > Also, this patch add two new file > iterator.h > and > DataTypes.h What do you want to improve exactly? Do you experience

Because this patch must be applied in one time so that don't broken the buildbot system. So I just submit the configure and cmake at the same time. Also, this patch add two new file iterator.h and DataTypes.h for the reason that patch doesn't support for svn's rename mechanics. So I just add these two file and doesn't delete the old history files Because I doesn't get

...a; a = 1;], + [ ac_cv_have_int64_t="yes" ], + [ ac_cv_have_int64_t="no" ] + ) + if test "x$ac_cv_have_int64_t" = "xyes" ; then + AC_DEFINE(HAVE_INT64_T) + AC_MSG_RESULT([yes]) + have_int64_t=1 + else + AC_MSG_RESULT([no]) + fi +fi + +if (test -z "$have_u_int64_t" && \ + test "x$ac_cv_header_sys_bitypes_h" = "xyes") +then + AC_MSG_CHECKING([for u_int64_t in sys/bitypes.h]) + AC_TRY_COMPILE( + [ #include <sys/bitypes.h> ], + [ u_int64_t a; a = 1;], + [ ac_cv_have_u_int64_t="yes" ], + [ ac_cv_have...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1741 Summary: Patch to add support for building on Haiku Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.4p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

...for dlerror - found -- Looking for dlopen -- Looking for dlopen - found -- Looking for __GLIBC__ -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - found -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T - Success -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS - Success -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_NO_VARIADIC_MACROS_FLAG -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_NO_VARIADIC_MACROS_...

...nd > > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ > > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - found > > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T > > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success > > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T > > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success > > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T > > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success > > -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T > > -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T - Success > > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS > > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS - Success > > -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_NO_VARIADIC...

...en > -- Looking for dlopen - found > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - found > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success > -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T > -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T - Success > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS - Success > -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_NO_VARIADIC_MACROS_FLAG > -- Performin...

On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:09 AM, Marcello Maggioni wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest clang/llvm SVN versions and I get > this error on multiple systems : Linking, not compiling, but still. I am getting a similar error when building this morning. > Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: > "clang::Sema::checkPseudoObjectRValue(clang::Expr*)", referenced

...for __GLIBC__ >> > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - found >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T - Success >> > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS >> > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS - Success >> > -- Performing T...

...t; -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - found > >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T > >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success > >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T > >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success > >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T > >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success > >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T > >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T - Success > >> > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS > >> > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS - Success >...

Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest clang/llvm SVN versions and I get this error on multiple systems : (Compiling with gcc): llvm[4]: Compiling cc1_main.cpp for Debug+Asserts build llvm[4]: Compiling cc1as_main.cpp for Debug+Asserts build llvm[4]: Compiling driver.cpp for Debug+Asserts build llvm[4]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable clang

...gt; -- Looking for dlopen - found > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - not found > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS - Success > -- Found LibXml2: /sw/lib/libxml2.dylib (found version "2.9.1") > -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_NO_VARIADIC_MACROS_FLAG > -- Performing Te...

...dlerror - found -- Looking for dlopen -- Looking for dlopen - found -- Looking for __GLIBC__ -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - not found -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS - Success -- Found LibXml2: /sw/lib/libxml2.dylib (found version "2.9.1") -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_NO_VARIADIC_MACROS_FLAG -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_NO_VARIADIC_MACROS...

...gt; > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ > > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - not found > > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T > > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success > > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T > > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success > > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T > > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success > > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS > > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS - Success > > -- Found LibXml2: /sw/lib/libxml2.dylib (found version "2.9.1") > > -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_NO_VARIADIC_MACROS_FL...

...GLIBC__ - found >> >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T >> >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success >> >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T >> >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success >> >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T >> >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success >> >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T >> >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T - Success >> >> > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS >> >> > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_AT...

...for dlerror - found -- Looking for dlopen -- Looking for dlopen - found -- Looking for __GLIBC__ -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - found -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB - Success -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS - Success -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_NO_VARIADIC_MACROS_FLAG -- Performing T...

This file is for configure+make build, not CMake, so I'm not sure why it's being included into your build (these failures aren't reproducible for me). Can you please list the exact steps you're doing to build LLVM with CMake and make sure you don't have additional CFLAGS (LDFLAGS etc) defined? On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>

Hallo all, I was trying to Build LLVM with the cmake option LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES just out of curiosity. I used the RELEASE_400/final tag. It didn't work as I almost expected. So I'm wondering if the modulemaps aren't maintained anymore? If they aren't maintained anymore, why aren't they removed and that cmake option also removed?