search for: have_sys_inotify_h

From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com> Callers are supposed to use the availability API to check for functions that may not be available in particular builds of libguestfs. If they don't do this, currently they tend to get obscure error messages, eg: libguestfs: error: zerofree: /dev/vda1: zerofree: No such file or directory This commit changes the error

...MODULESDIR: /opt/samba/lib SHLIBEXT: so LOCKDIR: /var STATEDIR: /var CACHEDIR: /var PIDDIR: /var SMB_PASSWD_FILE: /etc/samba/smbpasswd PRIVATE_DIR: /etc/samba System Headers: HAVE_SYS_ACL_H HAVE_SYS_CDEFS_H HAVE_SYS_EPOLL_H HAVE_SYS_FCNTL_H HAVE_SYS_FILE_H HAVE_SYS_INOTIFY_H HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H HAVE_SYS_IPC_H HAVE_SYS_MMAN_H HAVE_SYS_MOUNT_H HAVE_SYS_PARAM_H HAVE_SYS_PRCTL_H HAVE_SYS_QUOTA_H HAVE_SYS_RESOURCE_H HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H HAVE_SYS_SHM_H HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H HAVE_SYS_STATFS_H HAVE_SYS_STATVFS_H HAVE_SYS_STAT_H HAVE_SYS_SYSCA...

...a/private/smbpasswd ?? PRIVATE_DIR: /var/lib/samba/private ?? BINDDNS_DIR: /var/lib/samba/bind-dns System Headers: ?? HAVE_SYS_ACL_H ?? HAVE_SYS_AUXV_H ?? HAVE_SYS_CAPABILITY_H ?? HAVE_SYS_CDEFS_H ?? HAVE_SYS_DIR_H ?? HAVE_SYS_EPOLL_H ?? HAVE_SYS_EVENTFD_H ?? HAVE_SYS_FCNTL_H ?? HAVE_SYS_FILE_H ?? HAVE_SYS_INOTIFY_H ?? HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H ?? HAVE_SYS_IPC_H ?? HAVE_SYS_KERNEL_PROC_CORE_PATTERN ?? HAVE_SYS_MMAN_H ?? HAVE_SYS_MOUNT_H ?? HAVE_SYS_PARAM_H ?? HAVE_SYS_PRCTL_H ?? HAVE_SYS_QUOTAS ?? HAVE_SYS_QUOTA_H ?? HAVE_SYS_RESOURCE_H ?? HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H ?? HAVE_SYS_SENDFILE_H ?? HAVE_SYS_SHM_H ?? HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H...

On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 10:09 +0200, awl1 via samba wrote: > Hello again, Samba experts, > > sorry for being such a pain in your necks, but I really need to get a > recent Samba version to compile, and it looks like I definitely need > your help with this. > > In the meantime, I have found that the huge number of "conflicting > types" errors for rpc_*_init(...)

Samba 4.12.1, single server with AD+DC on Ubuntu 18.04. Filesystem: /dev/sdb1 on /home type ext4 (rw,relatime,stripe=32750,data=ordered) It all work as expected, but I occasionally get the error in subject which denies access to shares. Restarting Samba will restore functionality. What can be the cause of this problem? Thanks. [2020/05/27 18:24:35.795379, 8]

...ivate/smbpasswd PRIVATE_DIR: /usr/local/samba/private BINDDNS_DIR: /usr/local/samba/bind-dns System Headers: HAVE_SYS_ACL_H HAVE_SYS_AUXV_H HAVE_SYS_CAPABILITY_H HAVE_SYS_CDEFS_H HAVE_SYS_DIR_H HAVE_SYS_EPOLL_H HAVE_SYS_EVENTFD_H HAVE_SYS_FCNTL_H HAVE_SYS_FILE_H HAVE_SYS_INOTIFY_H HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H HAVE_SYS_IPC_H HAVE_SYS_KERNEL_PROC_CORE_PATTERN HAVE_SYS_MMAN_H HAVE_SYS_MOUNT_H HAVE_SYS_PARAM_H HAVE_SYS_PRCTL_H HAVE_SYS_QUOTAS HAVE_SYS_QUOTA_H HAVE_SYS_RESOURCE_H HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H HAVE_SYS_SENDFILE_H HAVE_SYS_SHM_H HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H...

...", str_zcat, path, str_cpio) == -1) { reply_with_perror ("asprintf"); return NULL; } diff --git a/daemon/inotify.c b/daemon/inotify.c index ed425b8..cb0a366 100644 --- a/daemon/inotify.c +++ b/daemon/inotify.c @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ #include "optgroups.h" #ifdef HAVE_SYS_INOTIFY_H +GUESTFSD_EXT_CMD(str_sort, sort); + /* Currently open inotify handle, or -1 if not opened. */ static int inotify_fd = -1; @@ -318,7 +320,7 @@ do_inotify_files (void) return NULL; } - snprintf (cmd, sizeof cmd, "sort -u > %s", tempfile); + snprintf (cmd, sizeof cmd, &qu...

...", str_zcat, path, str_cpio) == -1) { reply_with_perror ("asprintf"); return NULL; } diff --git a/daemon/inotify.c b/daemon/inotify.c index ed425b8..3cbb237 100644 --- a/daemon/inotify.c +++ b/daemon/inotify.c @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ #include "optgroups.h" #ifdef HAVE_SYS_INOTIFY_H +GUESTFS_EXT_CMD(str_sort, sort); + /* Currently open inotify handle, or -1 if not opened. */ static int inotify_fd = -1; @@ -318,7 +320,7 @@ do_inotify_files (void) return NULL; } - snprintf (cmd, sizeof cmd, "sort -u > %s", tempfile); + snprintf (cmd, sizeof cmd, &quo...

...cpio --quiet -it", path) == -1) { reply_with_perror ("asprintf"); return NULL; } diff --git a/daemon/inotify.c b/daemon/inotify.c index b9bfed713..aa2350900 100644 --- a/daemon/inotify.c +++ b/daemon/inotify.c @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ #include "optgroups.h" #ifdef HAVE_SYS_INOTIFY_H -GUESTFSD_EXT_CMD(str_sort, sort); /* Currently open inotify handle, or -1 if not opened. */ static int inotify_fd = -1; @@ -327,7 +326,7 @@ do_inotify_files (void) return NULL; } - snprintf (cmd, sizeof cmd, "%s -u > %s", str_sort, tempfile); + snprintf (cmd, sizeof cm...

...cpio --quiet -it", path) == -1) { reply_with_perror ("asprintf"); return NULL; } diff --git a/daemon/inotify.c b/daemon/inotify.c index b9bfed713..5ceaacfe7 100644 --- a/daemon/inotify.c +++ b/daemon/inotify.c @@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ #include "optgroups.h" #ifdef HAVE_SYS_INOTIFY_H -GUESTFSD_EXT_CMD(str_sort, sort); + +DECLARE_EXTERNAL_COMMANDS ("sort") /* Currently open inotify handle, or -1 if not opened. */ static int inotify_fd = -1; @@ -327,7 +328,7 @@ do_inotify_files (void) return NULL; } - snprintf (cmd, sizeof cmd, "%s -u > %s",...

This is a simpler patch that removes GUESTFSD_EXT_CMD completely.

Hello, I've come across a curious issue with Samba 3.6.10. When running 'emacs' version GNU Emacs 23.3.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.0.6002) of 2011-03-10 on 3249CTO on Windows Server 2008 SP2 x64 and issuing a file "revert" of one sort or another against a Samba-served file, the 'smbd' process leaks two or three handles. Eventually, when 16k handles are open, this causes

Replace GUESTFSD_EXT_CMD with a command line option ‘./guestfsd --print-external-commands’