search for: have_sys_acl_h

I'm building 3.0.14a on Mandrake 10.2, trying to use the same config as my other servers (3.0.11), but ACLs are not working. In checking the outout of smbd -b, I see this line is missing: System Headers: HAVE_SYS_ACL_H .... But I am specifying ./configure --with-acl-support ... Adding an acl using 'setfacl -m 'NTDOMAIN+NTUSER' file does successfully add an ACL for the NT domain user at the CLI, but Samba won't show it. Clearly I'm missing a vital piece somewhere, but I'm not sure whe...

...atched for ACL's because the ACL packages/libraries mentioned earlier in this mail were already installed? Can this be tested with just a cp or a mv of a directory or file with ACL's on it? 3. When I do a "./smbd -b | grep -i ACL" on my newly compiled smbd deamon I got "HAVE_SYS_ACL_H, HAVE_POSIX_ACLS". Does this mean ACL's are compiled in successfully? I'm a bit in doubt because when I look at the list under "--with Options: & Build Options:" a WITH_ACL is lacking. TIA, Erik Hoitinga web: http://users.skynet.be/fanzel

Dear Andrew Tridgell, i cant compile the 2.2.1-9 package --with-acl-support, beacuse HAVE_SYS_ACL_H has wrong settings somewhere. i cant fix the bug, i just comment out the #ifdef HAVE_SYS_ACL_H line in the source/include/includes.h for a (i hope) good compilation. i use acl 1.1.2 from sgi, and the latest debian woody packages. Regards. Imre Szollosi mailto:szollosi@elme.hu

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello! I'm currently trying to get ACLs to work with my Samba-PDC. I compiled Samba with the "--with-acl-support"-option and the configure-script says: checking sys/acl.h usability... yes checking sys/acl.h presence... yes checking for sys/acl.h... yes After install, a "ldd smbd" gives libacl.so.1 => /lib/libacl.so.1

...ed with "user" security mode), Windows 2000 and Windows XP users might not be able to consistently list Samba users when configuring an ACL. We really don't have the option of doing a PDC. Is this a bad idea to try and get this to work without using PDC? smbd -b | grep ACL HAVE_SYS_ACL_H HAVE_ACL_LIBACL_H HAVE_POSIX_ACLS smb.conf [global] passdb backend = tdbsam add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -m %u delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel -r %u add group script = /usr/sbin/groupadd %g delete group script = /usr/sbin/groupdel %g add user to group scrip...

...*) + solaris*) AC_MSG_RESULT(Using solaris ACLs) AC_DEFINE(HAVE_SOLARIS_ACLS, 1, [true if you have solaris ACLs]) AC_DEFINE(SUPPORT_ACLS, 1) Configure detects the following after the above mod: $ grep -i acl config.status S["LIBS"]="-lacl " D["HAVE_SYS_ACL_H"]=" 1" D["HAVE_ACL_LIBACL_H"]=" 1" D["HAVE_ACLSORT"]=" 1" D["HAVE_LIBACL"]=" 1" D["HAVE_POSIX_ACLS"]=" 1" D["SUPPORT_ACLS"]=" 1"

...ks like a charm. But when my users try to access files via samba they cannot access their files even though ACL permissions on the files are set to give them full access. first of all how can I check wheter ACL is indeed enabled in my samba installation? "smbd -b | grep -i acl" yields: HAVE_SYS_ACL_H HAVE_ACL_LIBACL_H HAVE_POSIX_ACLS pdb_ldap pdb_smbpasswd pdb_tdbsam rpc_lsarpc rpc_winreg rpc_initshutdown rpc_dssetup rpc_wkssvc rpc_svcctl2 rpc_ntsvcs2 rpc_netlogon rpc_netdfs rp c_srvsvc rpc_spoolss rpc_eventlog2 rpc_samr idmap_ldap idmap_tdb idmap_passdb idmap_nss nss_info_template auth_sam aut...

...le to try. > I'll be very grateful. > > Paul. > > -----Original Message----- > From: ??????? ????? > Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 9:09 AM > To: 'jht@samba.org' > Subject: RE: SAMBA+ACL+XFS > > > John many thanks for the answer, request return: > HAVE_SYS_ACL_H > HAVE_POSIX_ACLS > > -----Original Message----- > From: John H Terpstra [mailto:jht@samba.org] > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 11:34 PM > To: ??????? ????? > Subject: Re: SAMBA+ACL+XFS > > > Paul, > > Please send the output of running: > > smbd -B | grep...

...xghost.bin, sent 0x4 [2005/04/20 10:56:08, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(147) error packet at smbd/nttrans.c(2179) cmd=160 (SMBnttrans) NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED Running on Suse 9.2 File system is Reiserfs with mount options acl,user_xattr 1 2 Samba is compiled with acl and ldap support smbd -b HAVE_SYS_ACL_H HAVE_POSIX_ACLS have net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=dpdev which is our IT group. Logged as myself uid=272(larry) gid=544(Administrators) groups=0(root),100(users),101(dpdev),108( vsifax),109(www),200(informix),512(Domain Admins),544(Administrators),1000(dp) I ca...

...domain\040users:r-x mask::r-x other::--- # file: group/tech # owner: root # group: root user::--- group::--- group:tech:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::--- default:group::--- default:group:tech:rwx default:mask::rwx default:other::--- ---------- Build options -- # smbd -b | grep -i acl HAVE_SYS_ACL_H HAVE_ACL_LIBACL_H HAVE_POSIX_ACLS vfs_acl_tdb_init vfs_acl_xattr_init pdb_ldap pdb_smbpasswd pdb_tdbsam rpc_lsarpc rpc_winreg rpc_initshutdown rpc_dssetup rpc_wkssvc rpc_svcctl2 rpc_ntsvcs2 rpc_netlogon rpc_netdfs rpc_srvsvc rpc_spoolss rpc_eventlog2 rpc_samr idmap_ldap idmap_tdb id...

yes i have, this is my share-config: [share] path = /mnt/gluster/daten/share/ public = yes writeable = yes browseable = yes inherit permissions = Yes inherit acls = Yes map acl inherit = Yes nt acl support = yes vfs objects = acl_xattr F?bio Leandro Rodrigues Cordeiro schrieb: > Hi, > > Have you tried adding the share writeable? > [share] > writeable = yes > > att, >

I have samba server joined to a domain that I'm trying to use ads security and acls on. I can set acls on the Unix file system, and access from a windows client seems to honor them. I can't view the acls under the security tab, all I see are the standard Unix permissions instead. If I try to add an entry to the acl, I get an access denied error, even if the user is on the list of admin

...ba-3.0.2 The resulting smbd binary reports using -b: : --with Options: WITH_AUTOMOUNT WITH_PAM WITH_QUOTAS WITH_SENDFILE WITH_SMBMOUNT WITH_SYSLOG WITH_UTMP WITH_WINBIND and server:/opt/samba-3.0.2/sbin# ./smbd -b | grep ACL HAVE_SYS_ACL_H HAVE_POSIX_ACLS c) Configuration-file: /opt/samba-3.0.2/lib/smb.conf [global] workgroup = MYCOMPANY interfaces = eth0 os level = 65 preferred master = No domain master = No security = user encrypt passw...

...he Windows Security tab in Windows XP Sp2. Here is my configuration for samba-3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2. # grep ACL config-2.6.18-8.el5 CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_NFS_V3_ACL=y CONFIG_NFSD_V3_ACL=y CONFIG_NFS_ACL_SUPPORT=m # smbd -b | grep ACL HAVE_SYS_ACL_H HAVE_POSIX_ACLS # cat /etc/fstab /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 / ext3 defaults,acl,user_xattr 1 1 #mount /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on / type ext3 (rw,acl,user_xattr) #getfacl /storage/Engineers/abc.txt getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names #...

...re on the linux file server. any one with any idea as to what I should look at, that would be great, thanks! It has been a bummer modifying all the permission change requests by hand. ====================================================== samba is built with ACL support: smbd -b |grep ACL HAVE_SYS_ACL_H HAVE_POSIX_ACLS ====================================================== Kernel has ACL support built in as does the file system: CONFIG_NFS_ACL=y CONFIG_NFSD_ACL=y CONFIG_NFS_ACL_SUPPORT=y CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL=y ======================================================...

...al/samba/var LMHOSTSFILE: /usr/local/samba/lib/lmhosts LIBDIR: /usr/local/samba/lib SHLIBEXT: so LOCKDIR: /usr/local/samba/var/locks PIDDIR: /usr/local/samba/var/locks SMB_PASSWD_FILE: /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd PRIVATE_DIR: /usr/local/samba/private System Headers: HAVE_SYS_ACL_H HAVE_SYS_FCNTL_H HAVE_SYS_FILIO_H HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H HAVE_SYS_IPC_H HAVE_SYS_MMAN_H HAVE_SYS_MODE_H HAVE_SYS_MOUNT_H HAVE_SYS_PARAM_H HAVE_SYS_RESOURCE_H HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H HAVE_SYS_SHM_H HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H HAVE_SYS_SOCKIO_H HAVE_SYS_STATFS_H HAVE_SYS_STATVF...

Sparc Solaris / UFS file system. I have some ACL's set up for a handful of users and its all worked flawlessly with every incarnation of Samba I've used over the past couple years, which would be most. Last Friday evening I upgraded from 3.0.11 to 3.0.13 and some of the users I have some ACL's set up for promptly found Monday that they couldn't save new Excel files, they'd be

...al/samba/var LMHOSTSFILE: /usr/local/samba/etc/lmhosts LIBDIR: /usr/local/samba/lib SHLIBEXT: so LOCKDIR: /usr/local/samba/var/locks PIDDIR: /usr/local/samba/var/locks SMB_PASSWD_FILE: /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd PRIVATE_DIR: /usr/local/samba/private System Headers: HAVE_SYS_ACL_H HAVE_SYS_CDEFS_H HAVE_SYS_FILSYS_H HAVE_SYS_ID_H HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H HAVE_SYS_IPC_H HAVE_SYS_MMAN_H HAVE_SYS_MODE_H HAVE_SYS_PARAM_H HAVE_SYS_PRIV_H HAVE_SYS_RESOURCE_H HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H HAVE_SYS_SHM_H HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H HAVE_SYS_STATFS_H HAVE_SYS_STATVFS_H...

...CONFIGFILE: /etc/samba/smb.conf LOGFILEBASE: /var/log/samba LMHOSTSFILE: /etc/samba/lmhosts LIBDIR: /usr/lib/samba SHLIBEXT: so LOCKDIR: /var/lib/samba PIDDIR: /var/run SMB_PASSWD_FILE: /var/lib/samba/private/smbpasswd PRIVATE_DIR: /var/lib/samba/private System Headers: HAVE_SYS_ACL_H HAVE_SYS_CDEFS_H HAVE_SYS_FCNTL_H HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H HAVE_SYS_IPC_H HAVE_SYS_MMAN_H HAVE_SYS_MOUNT_H HAVE_SYS_PARAM_H HAVE_SYS_PRCTL_H HAVE_SYS_QUOTA_H HAVE_SYS_RESOURCE_H HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H HAVE_SYS_SHM_H HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H HAVE_SYS_STATFS_H HAVE_SYS_STATVF...

...OSTSFILE: /usr/local/nf/etc/lmhosts LIBDIR: /usr/local/nf/lib SHLIBEXT: so LOCKDIR: /usr/local/nf/var/samba/lock PIDDIR: /usr/local/nf/var/samba/pid SMB_PASSWD_FILE: /usr/local/nf/var/samba/private/smbpasswd PRIVATE_DIR: /usr/local/nf/var/samba/private System Headers: HAVE_SYS_ACL_H HAVE_SYS_CDEFS_H HAVE_SYS_EXTATTR_H HAVE_SYS_FCNTL_H HAVE_SYS_FILIO_H HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H HAVE_SYS_IPC_H HAVE_SYS_MMAN_H HAVE_SYS_MOUNT_H HAVE_SYS_PARAM_H HAVE_SYS_RESOURCE_H HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H HAVE_SYS_SHM_H HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H HAVE_SYS_SOCKIO_H...