Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "have_librpm".
Did you mean:
have_libdrm
2015 Apr 02
2
Re: [PATCH] Adding ibm-powerkvm distro detection (the right one)
...oreutils -o $d1
> These errors tells me exactly what I was talking about: you are
> building supermin on a rpm-based distribution without librpm support,
> meaning that supermin is basically non-functional.
>
> The abort() come from src/librpm-c.c, in the else part of the
> #ifdef HAVE_LIBRPM.
>
>> I will be honest and say that I didn't dig further understanding why the
>> rpm_is_available
>> check fails in ibm-powerkvm. The patch I sent is similar to an internal
>> patch we used to add
>> temporary support to the distro on a older version of supermi...
2015 Apr 02
2
Re: [PATCH] Adding ibm-powerkvm distro detection (the right one)
...me exactly what I was talking about: you are
>>> building supermin on a rpm-based distribution without librpm support,
>>> meaning that supermin is basically non-functional.
>>>
>>> The abort() come from src/librpm-c.c, in the else part of the
>>> #ifdef HAVE_LIBRPM.
>>>
>>>> I will be honest and say that I didn't dig further understanding why the
>>>> rpm_is_available
>>>> check fails in ibm-powerkvm. The patch I sent is similar to an internal
>>>> patch we used to add
>>>> temporary sup...
2015 Apr 02
2
Re: [PATCH] Adding ibm-powerkvm distro detection (the right one)
Hi Pino,
On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the
>> rpm_is_avaiable verification
>> in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla).
> the new version of the patch is somehow confusing.
2015 Apr 02
0
Re: [PATCH] Adding ibm-powerkvm distro detection (the right one)
...repare $USE_INSTALLED bash coreutils -o $d1
These errors tells me exactly what I was talking about: you are
building supermin on a rpm-based distribution without librpm support,
meaning that supermin is basically non-functional.
The abort() come from src/librpm-c.c, in the else part of the
#ifdef HAVE_LIBRPM.
> I will be honest and say that I didn't dig further understanding why the
> rpm_is_available
> check fails in ibm-powerkvm. The patch I sent is similar to an internal
> patch we used to add
> temporary support to the distro on a older version of supermin (the
> version s...
2015 Apr 02
0
Re: [PATCH] Adding ibm-powerkvm distro detection (the right one)
...e errors tells me exactly what I was talking about: you are
> > building supermin on a rpm-based distribution without librpm support,
> > meaning that supermin is basically non-functional.
> >
> > The abort() come from src/librpm-c.c, in the else part of the
> > #ifdef HAVE_LIBRPM.
> >
> >> I will be honest and say that I didn't dig further understanding why the
> >> rpm_is_available
> >> check fails in ibm-powerkvm. The patch I sent is similar to an internal
> >> patch we used to add
> >> temporary support to the distro...
2015 Apr 02
0
Re: [PATCH] Adding ibm-powerkvm distro detection (the right one)
...s talking about: you are
>>>> building supermin on a rpm-based distribution without librpm support,
>>>> meaning that supermin is basically non-functional.
>>>>
>>>> The abort() come from src/librpm-c.c, in the else part of the
>>>> #ifdef HAVE_LIBRPM.
>>>>
>>>>> I will be honest and say that I didn't dig further understanding
>>>>> why the
>>>>> rpm_is_available
>>>>> check fails in ibm-powerkvm. The patch I sent is similar to an
>>>>> internal
>>...
2014 Sep 17
4
[PATCH 0/2] supermin: use librpm for rpm support
Hi,
this work makes supermin use the rpm library instead of invoking rpm
directly. This, together with a needed refactoring of the dependency
resolution, should help in make supermin faster on rpm-based systems.
Surely the patches will still need polishing, especially for behaviours
of newly added stuff, but at least it's a good starting point.
Noting that you need rpm-devel on most of rpm