search for: have_librpm

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "have_librpm".

Did you mean: have_libdrm
2015 Apr 02
2
Re: [PATCH] Adding ibm-powerkvm distro detection (the right one)
...tils -o $d1 > These errors tells me exactly what I was talking about: you are > building supermin on a rpm-based distribution without librpm support, > meaning that supermin is basically non-functional. > > The abort() come from src/librpm-c.c, in the else part of the > #ifdef HAVE_LIBRPM. > >> I will be honest and say that I didn't dig further understanding why the >> rpm_is_available >> check fails in ibm-powerkvm. The patch I sent is similar to an internal >> patch we used to add >> temporary support to the distro on a older version of supermi...
2015 Apr 02
2
Re: [PATCH] Adding ibm-powerkvm distro detection (the right one)
...xactly what I was talking about: you are >>> building supermin on a rpm-based distribution without librpm support, >>> meaning that supermin is basically non-functional. >>> >>> The abort() come from src/librpm-c.c, in the else part of the >>> #ifdef HAVE_LIBRPM. >>> >>>> I will be honest and say that I didn't dig further understanding why the >>>> rpm_is_available >>>> check fails in ibm-powerkvm. The patch I sent is similar to an internal >>>> patch we used to add >>>> temporary sup...
2015 Apr 02
2
Re: [PATCH] Adding ibm-powerkvm distro detection (the right one)
Hi Pino, On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the >> rpm_is_avaiable verification >> in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). > the new version of the patch is somehow
2015 Apr 02
0
Re: [PATCH] Adding ibm-powerkvm distro detection (the right one)
...re $USE_INSTALLED bash coreutils -o $d1 These errors tells me exactly what I was talking about: you are building supermin on a rpm-based distribution without librpm support, meaning that supermin is basically non-functional. The abort() come from src/librpm-c.c, in the else part of the #ifdef HAVE_LIBRPM. > I will be honest and say that I didn't dig further understanding why the > rpm_is_available > check fails in ibm-powerkvm. The patch I sent is similar to an internal > patch we used to add > temporary support to the distro on a older version of supermin (the > version s...
2015 Apr 02
0
Re: [PATCH] Adding ibm-powerkvm distro detection (the right one)
...rors tells me exactly what I was talking about: you are > > building supermin on a rpm-based distribution without librpm support, > > meaning that supermin is basically non-functional. > > > > The abort() come from src/librpm-c.c, in the else part of the > > #ifdef HAVE_LIBRPM. > > > >> I will be honest and say that I didn't dig further understanding why the > >> rpm_is_available > >> check fails in ibm-powerkvm. The patch I sent is similar to an internal > >> patch we used to add > >> temporary support to the distro...
2015 Apr 02
0
Re: [PATCH] Adding ibm-powerkvm distro detection (the right one)
...lking about: you are >>>> building supermin on a rpm-based distribution without librpm support, >>>> meaning that supermin is basically non-functional. >>>> >>>> The abort() come from src/librpm-c.c, in the else part of the >>>> #ifdef HAVE_LIBRPM. >>>> >>>>> I will be honest and say that I didn't dig further understanding >>>>> why the >>>>> rpm_is_available >>>>> check fails in ibm-powerkvm. The patch I sent is similar to an >>>>> internal >>...
2014 Sep 17
4
[PATCH 0/2] supermin: use librpm for rpm support
Hi, this work makes supermin use the rpm library instead of invoking rpm directly. This, together with a needed refactoring of the dependency resolution, should help in make supermin faster on rpm-based systems. Surely the patches will still need polishing, especially for behaviours of newly added stuff, but at least it's a good starting point. Noting that you need rpm-devel on most of rpm