search for: have_libpthread

...g support by Alexander Alekseev <alex at alemate.ru> + * * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions * are met: @@ -58,6 +60,9 @@ #ifdef HAVE_PATHS_H # include <paths.h> #endif +#ifdef HAVE_LIBPTHREAD +#include "ssh-openssl-thread-locking.h" +#endif #include <signal.h> #include <stdarg.h> #include <stdio.h> @@ -88,6 +93,9 @@ AUTH_UNUSED, AUTH_SOCKET, AUTH_CONNECTION +#ifdef HAVE_LIBPTHREAD + , AUTH_INUSE +#endif } sock_type; typedef struct { @@ -137,6...

...oject uses different variable names for results of these checks. For example, most subprojects check if pthread is available and store the result in: COMPILER_RT_HAS_LIBPTHREAD (compiler-rt) LIBCXX_HAS_PTHREAD_LIB (libc++) LIBCXXABI_HAS_PTHREAD_LIB (libc++abi) LIBUNWIND_HAS_PTHREAD_LIB (libunwind) HAVE_LIBPTHREAD (llvm) This means that even though this check would ideally be performed just once (per target) and reused everywhere, it's performed 5 times. The same is true for most flags and library checks. I think that this is really unnecessary and could be easily improved by unifying CMake variable na...

...names for results of these checks. For example, most subprojects check if pthread is available and store the result in: > > COMPILER_RT_HAS_LIBPTHREAD (compiler-rt) > LIBCXX_HAS_PTHREAD_LIB (libc++) > LIBCXXABI_HAS_PTHREAD_LIB (libc++abi) > LIBUNWIND_HAS_PTHREAD_LIB (libunwind) > HAVE_LIBPTHREAD (llvm) > > This means that even though this check would ideally be performed just once (per target) and reused everywhere, it's performed 5 times. The same is true for most flags and library checks. > > I think that this is really unnecessary and could be easily improved by unifyi...

...se checks. For example, most subprojects check if pthread is available and store the result in: >> >> COMPILER_RT_HAS_LIBPTHREAD (compiler-rt) >> LIBCXX_HAS_PTHREAD_LIB (libc++) >> LIBCXXABI_HAS_PTHREAD_LIB (libc++abi) >> LIBUNWIND_HAS_PTHREAD_LIB (libunwind) >> HAVE_LIBPTHREAD (llvm) >> >> This means that even though this check would ideally be performed just once (per target) and reused everywhere, it's performed 5 times. The same is true for most flags and library checks. >> >> I think that this is really unnecessary and could be easily im...

..._LIBFAM ?? HAVE_LIBFORM ?? HAVE_LIBFUSE ?? HAVE_LIBGCRYPT ?? HAVE_LIBGFAPI ?? HAVE_LIBGNUTLS ?? HAVE_LIBGPGME ?? HAVE_LIBGPG_ERROR ?? HAVE_LIBJANSSON ?? HAVE_LIBKRB5 ?? HAVE_LIBLBER ?? HAVE_LIBLDAP ?? HAVE_LIBLMDB ?? HAVE_LIBMENU ?? HAVE_LIBNCURSES ?? HAVE_LIBNSL ?? HAVE_LIBPANEL ?? HAVE_LIBPOPT ?? HAVE_LIBPTHREAD ?? HAVE_LIBREPLACE ?? HAVE_LIBRESOLV ?? HAVE_LIBRT ?? HAVE_LIBTASN1 ?? HAVE_LIBUTIL ?? HAVE_LIBZ ?? HAVE_LINK ?? HAVE_LINUX_FALLOCATE ?? HAVE_LINUX_INOTIFY ?? HAVE_LINUX_IOCTL ?? HAVE_LINUX_READAHEAD ?? HAVE_LINUX_SPLICE ?? HAVE_LINUX_THREAD_CREDENTIALS ?? HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN ?? HAVE_LLSEEK ?? HAVE_...

Samba 4.12.1, single server with AD+DC on Ubuntu 18.04. Filesystem: /dev/sdb1 on /home type ext4 (rw,relatime,stripe=32750,data=ordered) It all work as expected, but I occasionally get the error in subject which denies access to shares. Restarting Samba will restore functionality. What can be the cause of this problem? Thanks. [2020/05/27 18:24:35.795379, 8]

...IBFORM HAVE_LIBGFAPI HAVE_LIBGLIB_2_0 HAVE_LIBGPGME HAVE_LIBICUDATA HAVE_LIBICUI18N HAVE_LIBICUUC HAVE_LIBJANSSON HAVE_LIBKRB5 HAVE_LIBLBER HAVE_LIBLDAP HAVE_LIBLMDB HAVE_LIBMENU HAVE_LIBNCURSES HAVE_LIBNSL HAVE_LIBPAM HAVE_LIBPANEL HAVE_LIBPOPT HAVE_LIBPTHREAD HAVE_LIBREADLINE HAVE_LIBREPLACE HAVE_LIBRESOLV HAVE_LIBSYSTEMD HAVE_LIBTASN1 HAVE_LIBUNWIND HAVE_LIBUTIL HAVE_LIBZ HAVE_LINK HAVE_LINUX_FALLOCATE HAVE_LINUX_INOTIFY HAVE_LINUX_IOCTL HAVE_LINUX_READAHEAD HAVE_LINUX_SPLICE HAVE_LINUX_THREAD_CREDENTIALS...

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote: [ brutal-snip ] ... > [ TODO#S: Before doing a 2nd build (and in a 3rd run using more > optimized binaries) ] > > How do I anable LTO via CMAKE? > > > LLVM_ENALBLE_LTO=On > [ v4 of my build-script attached ] Hi Chris, thanks for the response! That seems to work (see below). $ cd

Trying to run a self host "ninja check-clang" with ASan enabled I hit a /lot/ of errors like this (strangely I hit none of these in check-llvm, only in check-clang): Any ideas? ==10525==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x10800 (67584) bytes at address 0x631000014800 ==10525==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:

.../Have include histedit.h HAVE_HISTEDIT_H:INTERNAL=1 //Test HAVE_INT64_T HAVE_INT64_T:INTERNAL=1 //Have include inttypes.h HAVE_INTTYPES_H:INTERNAL=1 //Have symbol isatty HAVE_ISATTY:INTERNAL=1 //Have library dl HAVE_LIBDL:INTERNAL=1 //Have library edit HAVE_LIBEDIT:INTERNAL=1 //Have library pthread HAVE_LIBPTHREAD:INTERNAL=1 //Have library rt HAVE_LIBRT:INTERNAL=1 //Have library xar HAVE_LIBXAR:INTERNAL= //Have library z HAVE_LIBZ:INTERNAL=1 //Have include link.h HAVE_LINK_H:INTERNAL=1 //Have symbol lseek64 HAVE_LSEEK64:INTERNAL=1 //Have include mach/mach.h HAVE_MACH_MACH_H:INTERNAL= //Have symbol mallctl HA...