search for: have_int64_t

...s inspired by one from Tim Mooney: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-dev&m=99842334021906&w=2 -- albert chin (china at thewrittenword.com) -- snip snip --- configure.ac.orig Wed May 29 17:51:40 2002 +++ configure.ac Tue Jun 4 18:02:20 2002 @@ -1045,7 +1024,20 @@ AC_DEFINE(HAVE_INT64_T) have_int64_t=1 fi - + +if test -z "$have_int64_t" ; then + AC_MSG_CHECKING([for int64_t type in stdint.h]) + AC_TRY_COMPILE( + [ #include <stdint.h> ], + [ int64_t a; a = 1], + [ + AC_DEFINE(HAVE_INT64_T) + AC_MSG_RESULT(yes) + ], + [ AC_MSG_RESULT(no) ] + ) +fi +...

...nssh-2.9p2/configure.in --- openssh-2.9p2.orig/configure.in Mon May 28 12:21:44 2001 +++ openssh-2.9p2/configure.in Thu Aug 16 15:01:04 2001 @@ -821,6 +821,49 @@ ) fi +# if we didn't find int64_t and u_int64_t in sys/types.h but there is +# a sys/bitypes.h, check it too. +if (test -z "$have_int64_t" && \ + test "x$ac_cv_header_sys_bitypes_h" = "xyes") +then + AC_MSG_CHECKING([for int64_t in sys/bitypes.h]) + AC_TRY_COMPILE( + [ #include <sys/bitypes.h> ], + [ int64_t a; a = 1;], + [ ac_cv_have_int64_t="yes" ], + [ ac_cv_have_int64...

...+#ifdef HAVE_U_INT64_T void buffer_put_int64(Buffer *buffer, u_int64_t value); +#endif /* Returns a character from the buffer (0 - 255). */ int buffer_get_char(Buffer * buffer); --- defines.h.old Mon Jan 22 18:40:32 2001 +++ defines.h Mon Jan 22 19:45:41 2001 @@ -171,20 +171,22 @@ #ifndef HAVE_INT64_T # if (SIZEOF_LONG_INT == 8) typedef long int int64_t; +# define HAVE_INT64_T 1 # else # if (SIZEOF_LONG_LONG_INT == 8) typedef long long int int64_t; -# define HAVE_INTXX_T 1 +# define HAVE_INT64_T 1 # endif # endif #endif #ifndef HAVE_U_INT64_T # if (SIZEOF_LONG_INT == 8) typede...

On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 11:28 +0200, awl1 via samba wrote: > Hello Andrew, > > and many thanks for your fast reply! :-) > > Am 08.06.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > > I think the key to avoiding the issue is that you have listed rpc > > modules which are not modules. The only rpc server module is > > rpc_mdssvc_module. > > Ah, OK, I see - so I

...g for argz_next -- Looking for argz_next - found -- Looking for argz_stringify -- Looking for argz_stringify - found -- Looking for dlerror -- Looking for dlerror - found -- Looking for dlopen -- Looking for dlopen - found -- Looking for __GLIBC__ -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - found -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T - Success -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_A...

...gt; > -- Looking for argz_stringify - found > > -- Looking for dlerror > > -- Looking for dlerror - found > > -- Looking for dlopen > > -- Looking for dlopen - found > > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ > > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - found > > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T > > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success > > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T > > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success > > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T > > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success > > -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T > > -...

...und > -- Looking for argz_stringify > -- Looking for argz_stringify - found > -- Looking for dlerror > -- Looking for dlerror - found > -- Looking for dlopen > -- Looking for dlopen - found > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - found > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success > -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T > -- Performing Test HAVE_ERROR_T - Su...

On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:09 AM, Marcello Maggioni wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest clang/llvm SVN versions and I get > this error on multiple systems : Linking, not compiling, but still. I am getting a similar error when building this morning. > Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: > "clang::Sema::checkPseudoObjectRValue(clang::Expr*)", referenced

...VE_LIMITS_H 1 | #define HAVE_LOCALE_H 1 | #define HAVE_STDARG_H 1 | #define HAVE_STDBOOL_H 1 | #define HAVE_STDINT_H 1 | #define HAVE_STRING_H 1 | #define HAVE_DECL_SIGSETJMP 1 | #define HAVE_DECL_SIGLONGJMP 1 | #define HAVE_POSIX_SETJMP 1 | #define HAVE_GLIBC2 1 | #define RETSIGTYPE void | #define HAVE_INT64_T 1 | #define HAVE_INT_FAST64_T 1 | #define HAVE_DECL_SIZE_MAX 1 | #define R_SOCKLEN_T socklen_t | #define HAVE_STACK_T 1 | #define HAVE_INTPTR_T 1 | #define HAVE_UINTPTR_T 1 | #define R_INLINE inline | #define SIZEOF_INT 4 | #define INT_32_BITS 1 | #define SIZEOF_LONG 8 | #define SIZEOF_LONG_LONG 8...

..._stringify - found >> > -- Looking for dlerror >> > -- Looking for dlerror - found >> > -- Looking for dlopen >> > -- Looking for dlopen - found >> > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ >> > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - found >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success >> > -- Performing Test...

...d managed to compile a set co > cross-compiled binaries and installed them successfully onto my NAS. > Many thanks for your help in getting there! > while the output of my freshly cross-compiled version does not have any > single of them: > > $ grep 64 smbd-b_new.txt > HAVE_INT64_T > HAVE_UINT64_T > SIZEOF_INT64_T > SIZEOF_UINT64_T > > Does this mean that my new version will handle large files (with a > length of more than fits into 32 bits) inefficiently (or even not at > all)? Or is this difference in output expected and I simply don'...

...ortunately, the check for whether the system supports long longs' isn't correct and the wrong format string is used in some cases. Specifically, HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT isn't defined if int64_t is defined in the system headers. The patch below seperates the HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT logic from the HAVE_INT64_T logic. --- openssh-2.9p2.orig/defines.h Wed May 9 00:39:19 2001 +++ openssh-2.9p2/defines.h Fri Aug 10 17:44:58 2001 @@ -226,6 +226,10 @@ # endif #endif +#if (SIZEOF_LONG_LONG_INT == 8) +# define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT +#endif + #ifndef HAVE_SOCKLEN_T typedef unsigned int socklen_...

...@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ typedef unsigned int u_int; #endif +#ifndef __BIT_TYPES_DEFINED__ #ifndef HAVE_INTXX_T # if (SIZEOF_CHAR == 1) typedef char int8_t; @@ -211,6 +212,7 @@ # endif #define __BIT_TYPES_DEFINED__ #endif +#endif /* ifndef __BIT_TYPES_DEFINED__ */ /* 64-bit types */ #ifndef HAVE_INT64_T

...t; -- Looking for dlerror > >> > -- Looking for dlerror - found > >> > -- Looking for dlopen > >> > -- Looking for dlopen - found > >> > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ > >> > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - found > >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T > >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success > >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T > >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success > >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T > >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success > &gt...

...HAVE_PWRITE64 HAVE_READDIR64 HAVE_SENDFILE64 HAVE_STAT64 HAVE_STRUCT_DIRENT64 HAVE___OPEN64 HAVE___PREAD64 HAVE___PWRITE64 _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE while the output of my freshly cross-compiled version does not have any single of them: $ grep 64 smbd-b_new.txt HAVE_INT64_T HAVE_UINT64_T SIZEOF_INT64_T SIZEOF_UINT64_T Does this mean that my new version will handle large files (with a length of more than fits into 32 bits) inefficiently (or even not at all)? Or is this difference in output expected and I simply don't need to worry. Note that in my...

Hi, I'm trying to compile the latest clang/llvm SVN versions and I get this error on multiple systems : (Compiling with gcc): llvm[4]: Compiling cc1_main.cpp for Debug+Asserts build llvm[4]: Compiling cc1as_main.cpp for Debug+Asserts build llvm[4]: Compiling driver.cpp for Debug+Asserts build llvm[4]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable clang

...r_s - not found > -- Looking for setenv > -- Looking for setenv - found > -- Looking for dlerror > -- Looking for dlerror - found > -- Looking for dlopen > -- Looking for dlopen - found > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - not found > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOM...

...Looking for strerror_s -- Looking for strerror_s - not found -- Looking for setenv -- Looking for setenv - found -- Looking for dlerror -- Looking for dlerror - found -- Looking for dlopen -- Looking for dlopen - found -- Looking for __GLIBC__ -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - not found -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS - Success -- Found LibXml2: /sw...

...nv > > -- Looking for setenv - found > > -- Looking for dlerror > > -- Looking for dlerror - found > > -- Looking for dlopen > > -- Looking for dlopen - found > > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ > > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - not found > > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T > > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success > > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T > > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success > > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T > > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Success > > -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS > &g...

...r >> >> > -- Looking for dlerror - found >> >> > -- Looking for dlopen >> >> > -- Looking for dlopen - found >> >> > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ >> >> > -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - found >> >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T >> >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Success >> >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T >> >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Success >> >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T >> >> > -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_...