Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "have_getcon".
Did you mean:
have_getconf
2009 Aug 13
7
[PATCHx7] Misc patches
...on (const char *context)
{
-#ifdef HAVE_SETCON
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBSELINUX) && defined(HAVE_SETCON)
if (setcon ((char *) context) == -1) {
reply_with_perror ("setcon");
return -1;
@@ -55,7 +53,7 @@ do_setcon (const char *context)
char *
do_getcon (void)
{
-#ifdef HAVE_GETCON
+#if defined(HAVE_LIBSELINUX) && defined(HAVE_GETCON)
security_context_t context;
char *r;
@@ -77,5 +75,3 @@ do_getcon (void)
return -1;
#endif
}
-
-#endif /* HAVE_LIBSELINUX */
--
1.6.2.5
-------------- next part --------------
>From 715f3083ad7625bca182fd1d87e20f56c5b675...
2012 Feb 01
1
[PATCH] Clarify the error message when unavailable functions are called (RHBZ#679737).
From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com>
Callers are supposed to use the availability API to check for
functions that may not be available in particular builds of
libguestfs. If they don't do this, currently they tend to get obscure
error messages, eg:
libguestfs: error: zerofree: /dev/vda1: zerofree: No such file or directory
This commit changes the error