search for: have_dot

It seems the mail you are referring to never made the list: it's not in the archives and not in my mailbox. Take a look here: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2012-December/thread.html It's probably still waiting for moderation. On 07-01-13 17:07, Olivier BLIN wrote: > On 29/12/2012 00:06, Olivier Blin wrote: >> When building outside of the source tree, the Doxyfile

...------------------------------ - -# If the CLASS_DIAGRAMS tag is set to YES (the default) Doxygen will -# generate a inheritance diagram (in HTML, RTF and LaTeX) for classes with base -# or super classes. Setting the tag to NO turns the diagrams off. Note that -# this option is superseded by the HAVE_DOT option below. This is only a -# fallback. It is recommended to install and use dot, since it yields more -# powerful graphs. - -CLASS_DIAGRAMS = YES - -# If set to YES, the inheritance and collaboration graphs will hide -# inheritance and usage relations if the target is undocumented -#...

...------------------------------ - -# If the CLASS_DIAGRAMS tag is set to YES (the default) Doxygen will -# generate a inheritance diagram (in HTML, RTF and LaTeX) for classes with base -# or super classes. Setting the tag to NO turns the diagrams off. Note that -# this option is superseded by the HAVE_DOT option below. This is only a -# fallback. It is recommended to install and use dot, since it yields more -# powerful graphs. - -CLASS_DIAGRAMS = YES - -# If set to YES, the inheritance and collaboration graphs will hide -# inheritance and usage relations if the target is undocumented -#...

Not even sure how important this is considering the state of many of the online docs... I have doxygen installed as is noted for the requirements for 'make progdocs', but the make doesn't find dot. I have no idea where dot went, is or should have been... I am installing und Suse 9.0 and it's rough. If you forget something duringthe initial install, adding the package later

Trying to run a self host "ninja check-clang" with ASan enabled I hit a /lot/ of errors like this (strangely I hit none of these in check-llvm, only in check-clang): Any ideas? ==10525==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x10800 (67584) bytes at address 0x631000014800 ==10525==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:

...L___BUILTIN_FFS HAVE_DECL___BUILTIN_FFS:INTERNAL= //Have include dirent.h HAVE_DIRENT_H:INTERNAL=1 //Have symbol dladdr HAVE_DLADDR:INTERNAL= //Have symbol dlerror HAVE_DLERROR:INTERNAL=1 //Have include dlfcn.h HAVE_DLFCN_H:INTERNAL=1 //Have symbol dlopen HAVE_DLOPEN:INTERNAL=1 //Is dot available ? HAVE_DOT:INTERNAL=1 //Is dotty available ? HAVE_DOTTY:INTERNAL=1 //Have include errno.h HAVE_ERRNO_H:INTERNAL=1 //Have include execinfo.h HAVE_EXECINFO_H:INTERNAL=1 //Have symbol exp HAVE_EXP:INTERNAL=1 //Have symbol exp10 HAVE_EXP10:INTERNAL= //Have symbol exp2 HAVE_EXP2:INTERNAL=1 //Have include fcntl.h H...