search for: have_dma_api_debug

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "have_dma_api_debug".

2015 Nov 03
2
[PATCH 3/3] s390/dma: Allow per device dma ops
...HAVE_DMA_ATTRS > select PCI_MSI > help > Enable PCI support. Hm. Further down in this file, there's config HAS_DMA def_bool PCI select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG Should we maybe select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG above, drop the HAS_DMA config option and rely on not defining NO_DMA instead? Otherwise, the patch looks good to me.
2015 Nov 03
2
[PATCH 3/3] s390/dma: Allow per device dma ops
...HAVE_DMA_ATTRS > select PCI_MSI > help > Enable PCI support. Hm. Further down in this file, there's config HAS_DMA def_bool PCI select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG Should we maybe select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG above, drop the HAS_DMA config option and rely on not defining NO_DMA instead? Otherwise, the patch looks good to me.
2015 Nov 05
0
[PATCH 3/3] s390/dma: Allow per device dma ops
...gt;> help >> Enable PCI support. > > Hm. Further down in this file, there's > > config HAS_DMA > def_bool PCI > select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG > > Should we maybe select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG above, drop the HAS_DMA > config option and rely on not defining NO_DMA instead? Hmm, yes. That would simplify things a lot. Right now we include lib/Kconfig (which defines HAS_DMA) and define it ourselfes in arch/s390/Kconfig. WHoever come...
2016 Feb 01
0
[PATCH v6 3/9] s390/dma: Allow per device dma ops
...tions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig index 3be9c832dec1..5b22a26337b2 100644 --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig @@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ config S390 select HAVE_CMPXCHG_DOUBLE select HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK + select HAVE_DMA_ATTRS + select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD @@ -619,10 +621,6 @@ config HAS_IOMEM config IOMMU_HELPER def_bool PCI -config HAS_DMA - def_bool PCI - select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG - config NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH def_bool PCI diff --git a/ar...
2015 Nov 05
0
[GIT PULL v4 3/3] s390/dma: Allow per device dma ops
...), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig index 1d57000..e2a885b 100644 --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig @@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ config S390 select HAVE_CMPXCHG_DOUBLE select HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK + select HAVE_DMA_ATTRS + select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD @@ -580,7 +582,6 @@ config QDIO menuconfig PCI bool "PCI support" - select HAVE_DMA_ATTRS select PCI_MSI help Enable PCI support. @@ -620,10 +621,6 @@ config HAS_IOMEM conf...
2015 Nov 05
5
[GIT PULL v4 0/3] dma and virtio prep patches
Andy, to make it obvious which version is the latest, here is a branch The following changes since commit 6a13feb9c82803e2b815eca72fa7a9f5561d7861: Linux 4.3 (2015-11-01 16:05:25 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/borntraeger/linux.git dma for you to fetch changes up to fc7f9754db6ce0c12281da4055281f731d36bdee: s390/dma: Allow
2015 Nov 05
5
[GIT PULL v4 0/3] dma and virtio prep patches
Andy, to make it obvious which version is the latest, here is a branch The following changes since commit 6a13feb9c82803e2b815eca72fa7a9f5561d7861: Linux 4.3 (2015-11-01 16:05:25 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/borntraeger/linux.git dma for you to fetch changes up to fc7f9754db6ce0c12281da4055281f731d36bdee: s390/dma: Allow
2015 Nov 03
5
[PATCHv3 0/3] dma ops and virtio
Andy, this is the next and hopefully last version. Seems to work fine when replacing the previous patches in your tree. I have some reviews/acks for patch 2 and 3. patch 1 still needs one ack. Can you replace the patches in your tree and carry them along with your changes? old introduction: ----- There are some attempts to unify the dma ops (Christoph) as well as some attempts to make virtio use
2015 Nov 03
5
[PATCHv3 0/3] dma ops and virtio
Andy, this is the next and hopefully last version. Seems to work fine when replacing the previous patches in your tree. I have some reviews/acks for patch 2 and 3. patch 1 still needs one ack. Can you replace the patches in your tree and carry them along with your changes? old introduction: ----- There are some attempts to unify the dma ops (Christoph) as well as some attempts to make virtio use
2016 Feb 01
14
[PATCH v6 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 01
14
[PATCH v6 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Jan 29
18
[PATCH v5 00/10] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Jan 29
18
[PATCH v5 00/10] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 03
14
[PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 03
14
[PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too