search for: have_cxx_atomics64_without_lib

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "have_cxx_atomics64_without_lib".

2018 Aug 06
4
[Release-testers] [7.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged
...I'm running into a rather nasty snag now on i386-freebsd11, due to our lack of atomic 64 bit primitives; Phase2's configure dies with: > > -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB > -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB - Success > -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB > -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB - Failed > -- Looking for __atomic_load_8 in atomic > -- Looking for __atomic_load_8 in atomic - not found > CMake Error at cmake/modules/CheckAtomic.cmake:75 (message): > Host compiler appears to require libat...
2018 Aug 03
10
[7.0.0 Release] rc1 has been tagged
Dear testers, 7.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r338847). It's early in the release process, but I'd like to find out what the status is of the branch on our various platforms. Please run the test script, share the results, and upload binaries. Thanks, Hans
2018 May 14
1
Unable to build 'lld' on Mac OS 10.9
...CPU_COUNT - notfound -- Looking for pthread_getname_np -- Looking for pthread_getname_np -found -- Looking for pthread_setname_np -- Looking for pthread_setname_np -found -- Performing TestHAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB -- Performing TestHAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB - Success -- Performing TestHAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB- Success -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS- Success -- Performing TestSUPPORTS_VARIADIC_MACROS_FLAG -- Performing TestSUPPORTS_VARIADIC_MACROS_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_GNU_ZERO_VARIADIC_M...
2017 Mar 25
5
Modules Maintaining or Removing
Hallo all, I was trying to Build LLVM with the cmake option LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES just out of curiosity. I used the RELEASE_400/final tag. It didn't work as I almost expected. So I'm wondering if the modulemaps aren't maintained anymore? If they aren't maintained anymore, why aren't they removed and that cmake option also removed?
2019 Sep 17
2
Building LLVM with LLVM with no dependence on GCC
...p - found -- Looking for ffi_call -- Looking for ffi_call - found -- Performing Test HAVE_STD_IS_TRIVIALLY_COPYABLE -- Performing Test HAVE_STD_IS_TRIVIALLY_COPYABLE - Failed -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB - Success -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS - Success -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_VARIADIC_MACROS_FLAG -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_VARIADIC_MACROS_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_GNU_ZERO_VARIADIC_MAC...
2019 Sep 20
2
Building LLVM with LLVM with no dependence on GCC
...- found -- Looking for ffi_call -- Looking for ffi_call - found -- Performing Test HAVE_STD_IS_TRIVIALLY_COPYABLE -- Performing Test HAVE_STD_IS_TRIVIALLY_COPYABLE - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB - Success -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB - Success -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS -- Performing Test LLVM_HAS_ATOMICS - Success -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_VARIADIC_MACROS_FLAG -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_VARIADIC_MACROS_FLAG - Success -- Performing Test SUPPORTS_GNU_ZERO_VARIADIC_MAC...
2016 Dec 19
1
How to create Debian packages for release 3.9.0
Hello, Le 12/12/2016 à 18:29, Hans Wennborg a écrit : > +Sylvestre who knows about these things. > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Kris van Rens via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> L.S., >> >> I'm currently in the process of creating Debian packages for >> clang/llvm release 3.9.0. For this I'm using the steps as explained on
2017 Feb 11
2
Asan self host problems: Failed to deallocate
Trying to run a self host "ninja check-clang" with ASan enabled I hit a /lot/ of errors like this (strangely I hit none of these in check-llvm, only in check-clang): Any ideas? ==10525==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to deallocate 0x10800 (67584) bytes at address 0x631000014800 ==10525==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:
2017 Feb 15
2
Asan self host problems: Failed to deallocate
...t finding Threads FIND_PACKAGE_MESSAGE_DETAILS_Threads:INTERNAL=[TRUE][v()] //Have symbol __i386__ HAS_i386_DEF:INTERNAL=1 //Have symbol __i686__ HAS_i686_DEF:INTERNAL= //Have symbol backtrace HAVE_BACKTRACE:INTERNAL=1 //Have include CrashReporterClient.h HAVE_CRASHREPORTERCLIENT_H:INTERNAL= //Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS64_WITHOUT_LIB:INTERNAL=1 //Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB:INTERNAL=1 //Have symbol arc4random HAVE_DECL_ARC4RANDOM:INTERNAL= //Have symbol FE_ALL_EXCEPT HAVE_DECL_FE_ALL_EXCEPT:INTERNAL=1 //Have symbol FE_INEXACT HAVE_DECL_FE_INEXACT:INTERNAL=1 //Hav...