search for: have_bzlib_h

When building 2.8.0 this morning for Fedora, I noticed that it was building the included bzlib2 source and using it rather than the system bzip2 libraries and headers. I tracked down the reason to this section of configure: cat >>conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF /* end confdefs.h. */ #ifdef HAVE_BZLIB_H #include <bzlib.h> #endif int main() { char *ver = BZ2_bzlibVersion(); exit(strcmp(ver, "1.0.5") < 0); } _ACEOF That code wasn't working at all because HAVE_BZLIB_H never gets set anywhere, even though the configure script had found the system bzip2 bits. This patch...

...iers from pointer target type conftest.c:251: warning: implicit declaration of function 'exit' conftest.c:251: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'exit' conftest.c:251: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strcmp' for the program | #ifdef HAVE_BZLIB_H | #include <bzlib.h> | #endif | int main() { | char *ver = BZ2_bzlibVersion(); | exit(strcmp(ver, "1.0.6") < 0); | } | configure:34167: result: no configure:34173: checking whether bzip2 support suffices configure:34180: error: bzip2 library and headers are required To m...

Updating the Debian package to the current 2.7.1 rc, I noticed that R decides to use its own bzip2 sources. Looking at configure, I see the test is essentially a strcmp on '1.0.5' from the version-returning function: #ifdef HAVE_BZLIB_H #include <bzlib.h> #endif int main() { char *ver = BZ2_bzlibVersion(); exit(strcmp(ver, "1.0.5") < 0); } but unfortunately, bzip2 returns a different string that includes the date: edd at ron:~/src/debian/R/R-2.7.1.20080621> cat /tmp/bzver.c #in...

...ftest.c:251: warning: implicit declaration of function 'exit' > conftest.c:251: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in > function 'exit' > conftest.c:251: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strcmp' > > for the program > > | #ifdef HAVE_BZLIB_H > | #include <bzlib.h> > | #endif > | int main() { > | char *ver = BZ2_bzlibVersion(); > | exit(strcmp(ver, "1.0.6") < 0); > | } > | > configure:34167: result: no > configure:34173: checking whether bzip2 support suffices > configure:34180: e...

...r /opt -name bzlib.h -ls 66420 7 -rw-r--r-- 1 root system 6245 Nov 3 10:15 /opt/buildaix/include/bzlib.h Seems a very specific bzip2 library is desired - 1.0.6 - not what the message says! BZ2_version():1.0.5, 10-Dec-2007 /* end confdefs.h. */ #include <stdio.h> #ifdef HAVE_BZLIB_H #include <bzlib.h> #endif int main() { char *ver = BZ2_bzlibVersion(); fprintf(stderr,"BZ2_version():%s\n",ver); /* added by aixtools for debugging */ exit(strcmp(ver, "1.0.6") < 0); } So, my question - is this REALLY needed (v1.0.6) as it may break...

Dear All, zlib has been removed from R-devel src/extra recently, and building R requires zlib >= 1.2.5. Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (also used on Travis CI) only has 1.2.3. This means that the next version of R will probably not available on Ubuntu 12.04. (Unless I am missing something of course.) Which is probably fine, it is almost three years old now. I guess R-core is aware of this. Just wanted to

On 2015-10-15 15:02, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > On 15/10/2015 13:32, Michael Felt wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Just wanted to let you know I am getting close to packaging R for AIX in >> 64.bit mode. > > Which version? (You mentioned 3.1.3 and 3.2.2 far below.) There is > little value in reporting on frozen branches, and most value in > reporting on R-devel where

...lam */ > /* #undef FRESHCLAM_NO_CACHE */ > > /* access rights in msghdr */ > /* #undef HAVE_ACCRIGHTS_IN_MSGHDR */ > > /* attrib aligned */ > #define HAVE_ATTRIB_ALIGNED 1 > > /* attrib packed */ > #define HAVE_ATTRIB_PACKED 1 > > /* have bzip2 */ > /* #define HAVE_BZLIB_H 1 */ > > /* ancillary data style fd pass */ > /* #define HAVE_CONTROL_IN_MSGHDR 1 */ > > /* Define to 1 if you have the `ctime_r' function. */ > /* #define HAVE_CTIME_R 1 */ > > /* ctime_r takes 2 arguments */ > /* #define HAVE_CTIME_R_2 1 */ > > /* ctime_r take...

Chris Lattner wrote: > One way to do this is to add a "cut down" version of the app to the > test suite. I disabled optional features in clamav-config.h > >> 2. GPL license. Chris? > > Any open source license that allows unrestricted redistribution is > fine in llvm-test Ok, I have created a script that automatically checks out ClamAV 0.92-stable source code

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Evan Cheng wrote: > We always welcome more tests. But it looks like there are two issues > here. > > 1. The autoconf requirement. Is it possible to get one configuration > working without the need for autoconf? One way to do this is to add a "cut down" version of the app to the test suite. > 2. GPL license. Chris? Any open source license that