search for: have_bar

...ionally compile sources, > we should be testing against WITH_FOO instead of HAVE_FOO. As far as I can > see, the HAVE_FOO stuff should be replaced almost everywhere by WITH_FOO > except in configure.in, where the prerequisites for WITH_BAR may require the > presence of both HAVE_FOO and HAVE_BAR. > > Any thoughts? Interesting, I hadn't noticed that. I wonder if it's just because packagers tend to enable almost everything? I don't have time to check into this now, but later this week I can dig up my autotools book and see if there's some other possible explanation....