search for: havani

Hi Darin, Le 05/06/2024 ? 17:34, Darin via samba a ?crit?: > > > Hello Havany, > I am just going to jump into this discussion. > Welcome! >> We try 2 scenarios : - A "Big bang" migration to an new domain made from scratch : but we need to migrate all users, computers, laptops, filers without loosing profiles, files server access... In a short time (1-2 weeks

Mandi! Havany via samba In chel di` si favelave... >> It sounds like you are still using the old, deprecated (by Windows) >> roaming profiles, instead of Folder redirection. ?! Some more clue, Rowland? I use roaming profiles *AND* folder redirection, usually... ;-) > So, I think I will use the "classicupgrade" method. I will wait a few > days to make sure

Havany Hi, Did you try 133 mask instead of 0133 ? We use to disable acl for this kind of share and do something like that : [share] path = /a/share/path create mask = 133 directory mask = 022 valid users = @agroup write list = @sagroup force group = @agroup nt acl support = No Regards, Arnaud Cruzel Le 25/10/2024 ? 12:25, Gilles via samba a ?crit?: > Hello, > > On a Linux

On 25/10/2024 14:03, Havany via samba wrote: > Did you try 133 mask instead of 0133 ? > > We use to disable acl for this kind of share and do something like that : > > [share] > path = /a/share/path > create mask = 133 > directory mask = 022 > valid users = @agroup > write list = @sagroup > force group = @agroup > nt acl support = No Still no go: It's rwx

Hello, Le 06/06/2024 ? 15:40, Rowland Penny via samba a ?crit?: > On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 13:33:04 +0200 > Havany via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> - Classisupgrade is destructive for the NT4 Domain, but we can keep >> data of the old NT4 Domain and we can rollback to this with ours >> Ansible playbooks. We will loose all change between migration

On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 13:33:04 +0200 Havany via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > - Classisupgrade is destructive for the NT4 Domain, but we can keep > data of the old NT4 Domain and we can rollback to this with ours > Ansible playbooks. We will loose all change between migration and > rollback and we will improve a possible long downtime. > > - With "Big

Hello Havany, I am just going to jump into this discussion. > We try 2 scenarios : - A "Big bang" migration to an new domain made from scratch : but we need to migrate all users, computers, laptops, filers without loosing profiles, files server access... In a short time (1-2 weeks maximum) - A "classicupgrade" migration, but it need several steps to improve security. And at

On 20.06.2024 9:28, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 19:16:51 +0200 > Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Mandi! Havany via samba >> In chel di` si favelave... >> >>>> It sounds like you are still using the old, deprecated (by Windows) >>>> roaming profiles, instead of Folder redirection.

On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 19:16:51 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Havany via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > >> It sounds like you are still using the old, deprecated (by Windows) > >> roaming profiles, instead of Folder redirection. > > ?! Some more clue, Rowland? I use roaming profiles *AND* folder >

Hi samba list, I work on an classicupgrade of our NT4/ldap domain. On my tests (DC and filer are on FreeBSD and zfs file system, client is a Windows 10 22H2): -> I'm able to do this classicupgrade and keep all users able to connect on computers with their domain account. -> In a second step I configure samba DC to improve security and by the way I upgrade our FL to 2012_R2, schema

Hello, On a Linux partition, I'd like new files to be created as "rw r r". 0133 doesn't seem to be the right mask for that pupose. Does someone know what I should use instead? Thank you. ============ fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: 931.51 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors Disklabel type: dos Device???? Boot Start??????? End??? Sectors?? Size Id Type /dev/sda1? *???? 2048