search for: haumesser

I'm testing 0.9.7 now with lxc, and get the following error when trying to start a container: 2011-12-07 22:49:26.293: 1997: error : lxcControllerRun:1158 : unsupported configuration: Expected exactly one TTY fd My configuration is very simply: <domain type='lxc'> <name>hw</name> <uuid>38320e75-1ba0-d85a-6138-532a3a66f13d</uuid>

Thanks for this. Is their any other advantage our disadvantage in using the fuse client? Speed, reliability? In fact, has the anyone run vm's off fuse? On May 26, 2011 11:56 PM, "Chris Haumesser" <ch at luciddg.com> wrote: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20110527/ad53951d/attachment.html>

I'm experimenting with the libvirt lxc driver, and wondering if there is some way to control the capabilities assigned to the container processes. With lxc-tools, I can specify a configuration option, lxc.cap.drop, which causes the container processes to drop the specified privileges. My libvirt containers seem to run with

And speaking of running out of a shared read-only root, I get the following error when I attempt it: error: Failed to start domain hw error: internal error guest failed to start: PATH=/bin:/sbin TERM=linux LIBVIRT_LXC_UUID=38320e75-1ba0-d85a-6138-532a3a66f13d LIBVIRT_LXC_NAME=hw /bin/bash 2011-12-08 15:31:41.945: 1: info : libvirt version: 0.9.7 2011-12-08 15:31:41.945: 1: error :

All, We are in the process of determining a virtualized infrastructure and wanted to hear from current users of Gluster and VMWare. What we were looking to setup was an HA ESXi cluster (2 heads) with gluster backend (4 bricks to start, replicated/distributed), all backend connectivity would be 10Gbe. Mainly the storage would be for VM images but may include NAS files later. So our